Showing posts with label Voucher Schools. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Voucher Schools. Show all posts

Sunday, January 19, 2014

#148 January 19, 2014- A Society of Bullies?



Bullying, Fear and Anger. . .
Bullying is a word that has become widely used and misused in our discussions about the direction our society is moving in.  We hear the word used in a variety of settings and situations.  It is used to describe actions and to either promote or attack groups beliefs.  In fact, the word is so commonly tossed around that it is in danger of losing its power and meaning.  Just like racism, harassment and discrimination have become a tool and a target, so too bullying is in danger of becoming a caricature of itself in our discussions about important issues.

The use of these words in our society have followed a similar path.  First, groups of people who are suffering some type of difficulty, discrimination or other injustice begin to stand up for themselves and call attention to the issues at hand.  The issues may be large or small, but they are of importance in our society's effort to move forward towards achieving the goals that our founding documents lay out for us.  The groups involved fight for their rights and often achieve successes that lay the groundwork for future progress.  They face difficult odds and entrenched beliefs, but their message and energy helps break through some of these barriers.  Our historical landscape is filled with evidence of these struggles as our nation grapples with huge issues of race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and even just the simple goal of being able to go to work or school and to feel safe there.


These successes are usually achieved through legislative or legal means as groups try to cement their successes in our society and prevent the destruction of their achievements.  We pass laws that protect the rights of specific groups in order to codify the protections and rights that have been won in the struggle. The affected groups enjoy their successes and our entire society benefits from the progress that has been made.

Then there is pushback from those who, for whatever reason, fight against the efforts to promote equality and opportunity for others (or sometimes even for themselves).  This pushback is grounded in some form of fear and hate and seeks to return our society to the previous status quo.  Sometimes the resistance to progress is overt and instantaneous, and sometimes it is subtle and grows slowly over time.  All of this builds towards another cycle of struggle as the affected groups find the need to reassert their hard earned rights in our society.

One of the side effects of the struggle is that certain words and phrases become a part of our national lexicon.  At the outset these words have specific and direct meanings, but over time the words become so commonly used that they lose their impact, or change meanings.  People choose to use and define the terms in different ways, some that build their power, and some that diminish it.  Different groups struggle to control the use and definitions of these terms and our society grapples with the consequences of the struggles.  Those on all sides of an issue use the language of freedom and justice to promote their ideas and try to paint their opposition in a negative light. 


Another way that terms are defined is by associating them with some extreme, unusual or at times ridiculous position or action.  Opponents of a movement will choose the most outlandish examples in order to discredit those who have different opinions.  Too often we focus on the extreme, the ridiculous and the unusual and forget that most of our experiences exist in a more narrow range of "normal".  Thus we see important issues and concerns relegated to sideshow status and those with legitimate problems suffer the consequences.  People also tend to apply their own experiences, or allow other to define what "common sense" would dictate to be a proper definition of any given term.  This means that  we see claims in the media that school children can be bullied, but NFL players can not. 


What exactly constitutes bullying, discrimination, harassment and other similar terms is defined in different ways by the law, by individuals and by groups in society.  Yet, all of the words and ideas that are associated with the fight for equality, opportunity and justice share a common thread in that they involve groups with limited access to power and their fight to increase their influence politically, socially or economically.  It may be true that bullying can be done by anyone, even someone without power, but the reality is that most of the conflicts we engage in as a society are based on inequities in power.

The impact of an individual's or group's actions is directly related to the amount of power that they wield.  This is why we need to be careful when we use terms like bullying to describe the actions of groups fighting for their rights.  Public sector employees who belong to unions have been called bullies and thugs in an effort to dishonor their efforts to engage in collective bargaining and to maintain their rights and benefits in the workplace.  At the same time we see unionized public workers being vilified we see politicians like Scott Walker and Chris Christie lauded as heroes for standing up to the bullies.  This language has led some members of the public to question the rights of employees in general to unionize, yet the power of the individual worker pales in comparison to the power that management wields. 



We are living in a climate governed by fear, and as Yoda said, "Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering."  It isn't only in fiction that we see this connection between fear and a regression in societal values.  FDR in his Inaugural Address on March 4, 1933 stated, "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself--nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance."  By giving in to fear we twist words to make it seem like the oppressed are the ones causing the problems and the oppressors are a combination of victim and societal champion.

Fear is used to manipulate public opinion and divide people in order to allow a small number of people to maintain their elite status in our society.  Of course it isn't only public employees who are engaged in the struggles.  We have a host of groups and issues that are currently seeing their causes under significant attack.     

Fear and greed make many want to support economic policies that dole out crumbs to the many.  The increased tax revenue could be used to support our schools or otherwise improve our society, but instead will be given out to individuals in tiny increments for political gain. 


The rights and opportunities of all workers in America are being attacked in an effort to promote the interests of large business and the wealthy.  




Our fear and anger allows us to believe that executions will somehow deter crime and provide justice to victims. 
 

Women across the nation face significant challenges in their efforts to achieve equality in many aspects of life.   


The poorest Americans have always been seen as problems, and not as equal citizens.  


Issues around race have been a constant source of discontent since the founding of our nation.  






Politics and the press are venues where we have to be aware of those who would manipulate the system for their own gain.  



What makes these challenges all the more difficult is that they arise out of our own actions, interactions and inaction.  All of us act to preserve our own self interests and to advance our own objectives and those of the people who are closest to us.  To some degree we all engage in behavior that at times is bullying and can infringe on the rights and opportunities of others.  Issues like White Privilege are difficult to comprehend and accept for many of us, so we turn to a more comfortable way of looking at the world.  We are quick to blame, but slow to find compromise and goodness in others.  Our society is moving in a disturbing direction where "doing and being right" is less important than appearing to win on any given issue.  As a society we condone bullying and applaud those who aggressively attack others, as long as we are not their targets.   


Yet, we are all responsible for the society we live in.  This is true no matter our race, religion, gender, or any other demographic division.  If we are truly to live in a nation that can claim to provide justice and opportunity for all, then we need to be ready to look at our own beliefs and actions as well as those of others.  We need to recognize the impact that hate and anger have on the world we live in see how it divides, isolates and segregates us into self-interested, small-minded groups.  At times it may seem like we will never succeed in our struggles, but to continue the fight is to work to achieve a vision that has been shared by great individuals throughout history. 

On Monday we will celebrate the life and legacy of Reverend Martin Luther King Jr., and it is worthwhile to remember him not as an historical figure, but rather as a icon who we should be working to emulate.  His message of non-violence combined with a relentless drive to broadcast the values that America was founded on give us hope for the future.  We can all work towards achieving a society where opportunity is open to all, and we truly look at everyone as fellow citizens, not as separate pieces of a puzzle.  A puzzle that is created and framed for us by others, and one where our role is defined by our demographics.  Instead we must break the barriers that bind us and change the very essence of what we define ourselves to be.  As Dr. King said:   


"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that."

In this way we can counter the effects of fear and hatred and truly work towards a better Wisconsin, a better America and a better world. 

The Good, The Bad and
The Ugly. . .
The Good- People around the state continue to "speak their truth" and speak against bills like AB549 that will harm our students and our public schools.  


The bad side of this is that we will need to continue to fight negative education legislation as long as the current crop of legislators is in office.  



The Bad- Those of us wishing for a primary to select the Democrat's candidate for governor saw their hopes fade this week.



The Ugly- The public sees the debate about expanding the voucher system in Wisconsin through a lens that distorts and simplifies the facts to make it seem like a battle between freedom and government control.  The reality is that our public school system has flaws, but also a level of accountability and responsibility to our children that a privatized school system will likely never come close to achieving.


Sunday, March 24, 2013

Issue #106 March 24, 2013- April Elections, Resisting School Reform



April 2nd Elections Looming…
We are only about a week away from the April 2nd elections.  There are a number of important races that will be decided and everyone's participation is needed.  We know that spring elections are usually low turnout, so every vote will be even more important.  The ironic thing is that, while more people cast ballots in presidential elections, it is these local races that tend to have a greater impact on the individuals in specific communities.  So get informed, get involved and get to the polls (either on April 2nd, or vote early).


There are two major state wide races.  Both have significance in the continuing fight over the future of public education in Wisconsin.  In the race for State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Evers faces Don Pridemore.  Evers is the best choice in this contest.  He has experience, and is an advocate for public schools.  Pridemore is inexperienced and appears to be a mouthpiece for the "reform" and voucher movement.  He might be a good selection to lobby for privatization, but not to lead Wisconsin's Department of PUBLIC Instruction. 



The second state race is for a seat on the Supreme Court of Wisconsin.  This race features Ed Fallone against Pat Roggensack.  Once again there is a clear difference between the two candidates with Roggensack firmly in the conservative camp.  She is getting significant support from conservative organizations and represents the movement in Wisconsin to consolidate power in the hands of the GOP majority.

On the local level, there are three seats up for election on the Madison School Board. 

Seat #3- Dean Loumas vs. Wayne Strong
Seat #4 James Howard vs. Greg Packnett
Seat #5 TJ Mertz vs. the now out of the race Sarah Manski

While there are many issues facing the MMSD and the school board will be at the center of all the decisions made, the most important issue of all is the commitment of any elected board member to defending public education.  We can debate curriculum, we can disagree about testing and data driven reforms, and we can have conflicting visions of how best to address the many challenges that face our schools, however we can't afford to elect anyone who isn't fully committed to public education.  Someone who supports vouchers or any type of privatization should not be a school board member, making decisions about our public schools.  Voters must pay close attention to the comments, backgrounds and connections that candidates have and choose wisely in these races. 
     



The race for Dane County Circuit Court features Rhonda Lanford versus Rebecca St. John.  Lanford is a strong candidate who doesn't have the unsettling baggage that St. John brings with her.  St. John has connections with conservatives who are tied to the Walker administration.  It is important that we have qualified and impartial judges to provide fair, legally supported and ethical judgments.  Rhonda Lanford provides the best choice for Circuit Court Judge in Dane County.  


Organize for the Future…
It is safe to say that there has never been a time in human history when people have had more access to information so quickly and in such volume.  Most of us are never more than a second or two away from resources that provide us with up to the minute news about virtually any topic imaginable.  This access to information allows us to inform ourselves and others about important issues and to share opinions quickly, reaching more people than anyone could imagine just a few years ago.   

However, information is a double-edged sword in many ways.  As an educator I find it difficult to argue against anyone becoming more informed and accessing as much information as possible.  Yet, at the same time this vast amount of information threatens to overwhelm us and often creates a sense of hopelessness and frustration.  We are inundated with images and stories that, too often, demonstrate the negative aspects of human nature.  Leaving us with the idea that the world is a hostile place and one that we can have little effect on.  


You can feel this hopelessness in many ways as people withdraw into "safer" corners of the world and seek to shut others out.  Instead of building community, we see some arming themselves and increasing the barriers between people.  Instead of supporting public institutions we see a movement to privatize services and to exclude others so that a small number can feel secure.  We see organizations and institutions pulling back and becoming conservative in order to preserve resources and to keep functioning, even when these cuts are counterproductive and even harmful to those who rely on them.      

With all of the access to information and the ability to get a sense of public opinion quickly there is still a sense of disenfranchisement felt by a large portion of the people.  We also see an effort being made to manipulate public opinion and to generate fear through the way specific demographic groups and certain organizations are portrayed.  The protests in Wisconsin were called "mobs", the Chicago Teachers Union earned the label of "thugs" (one proudly carried by Wisconsin educators as well).  Extensive damage was done to the state capital in Madison and the normal operations of a city were disrupted by hordes of educators in Chicago.  The list of negative imagery used to describe those fighting for progressive values is virtually limitless. 

We also see the challenge of sorting through the vast amount of information to find accurate information.  Public opinion is manipulated through words, but also through the use of data and "facts".  These "facts" vary based on the source and the way that they are used.  We have watched the job numbers in Wisconsin fluctuate more than anyone could ever have thought possible, with multiple sources quoted and the data altered beyond recognition.  The numbers and "facts" become a part of the argument and are used even when later proven incorrect.  Apparently, despite claims to the contrary, Wisconsin isn't really "Open for Business".    
  



As the struggle continues it becomes more and more difficult for individuals to speak out against the wrongs that are being done in the name of "balancing the budget" and "preserving American values".  Now, more than ever, we need the support of others to work to move our society in a more socially just direction.  It is vitally important that those of us with the connections, the knowledge and the ability to act do just that, act in the defense of those who are silenced and act in the name of a society that is truly "Of the People, by the People and for the People."      





Defending Public Education…
We have reached a critical period in the evolution of public education in Wisconsin.  It is difficult to find a time when public schools faced more significant challenges to their existence.  Wisconsin appears poised to follow the patterns established in other states around the nation in opening our educational system to privatization initiatives.  The proposed expansion of the voucher system into new districts across the state threatens public education to the very core.  We don't have to look too far away to see what happens when the education "reform" movement gets a chance to operate.

It is important that we do everything possible to resist the ability of private schools to access public money.  The simple reality is that the privatization of schools has very little to do with improving educational outcomes for students.  It is all about accessing the financial opportunities that educational enterprises offer for entrepreneurs, and reestablishing the dominance of the elite over the rest of the population.  An elite that sees their power threatened by the increasing diversity in America's population and the wave of anti-establishment activism generated by the Wisconsin Uprising, the Occupy Movement and other similar efforts. 
It is clear that there is a concerted effort being made to undermine the public's trust in our educational system and to play on the fears of the white, male citizens who face a future where they will be in the minority.  The established "normal" is threatened by the changing demographics and the continuing efforts of those previously disenfranchised to exercise their rights to equal opportunity.  Controlling education not only provides financial opportunity, but also is a tried and true way to keep "others" in their place in society.  


One way to achieve their goals of undermining trust in public education is to make it appear that our schools are failing and need to be "reformed" or even totally replaced.  The current wave of testing and standards serves the multiple purposes of supposedly improving education, drawing attention to the "failures" of our public schools, while highlighting the struggles of specific groups.  Drawing attention to Achievement Gaps isn't done to improve the opportunities for the groups affected, but rather to divide and conquer groups that otherwise might find common cause in protecting public education.  Why else do we find the supposedly superior "reforms" mostly enacted in schools serving the urban poor and not in suburban schools?  Why else have private, voucher schools tried to avoid sharing information on their demographics and academic results (that don't compare favorably to the public schools).         



When it comes to defending public education there are many possible alliances that could be forged.  Unfortunately, we have lost control of a significant amount of the debate in the media and other public forums.  This can be seen in the fact that while most people involved in public education on a professional level (educators, school boards, administrators) are against the expansion of vouchers, the general public's opinion is mixed and many feel like they need more information.  We need to reclaim the debate and take the offensive in the battle over vouchers specifically and public education in general. 
uppitywis.org




I am realizing more and more, just what it means to be an educator and to belong to a union that represents public educators.  This is more than just an issue of protecting wages, benefits and working conditions.  It is about defending an institution that, while not perfect, provides the best opportunity for the most people to receive a quality education that they can use to improve themselves, their immediate personal circle and society as a whole.  We have an obligation to speak out for ourselves, but more importantly for the families we serve.      


In some ways it may be too late to stop the expansion of vouchers.  School "reformers" have the ear of many legislators and certainly have the support of Governor Walker who sees this as an excellent opportunity to not only cement his alliances with powerful allies, but also to strike another blow to public sector unions in Wisconsin.  However, we must continue to share the facts about voucher schools and let the public know the reality of what is happening.  We must also work to make sure that we connect with those who currently send their children to public schools.  We may not be able to halt the legislation, but we can certainly do everything possible to make public schools a more attractive alternative to vouchers.  What if, when given a choice, most people chose public schools and voucher schools were left empty?

Now is the time to form alliances, establish communication and develop relationships that will allow us to defend our public schools from privatization efforts.  We have excellent schools here in Wisconsin, and we have dedicated educators who work hard every day to try and educate the young people in our state.  It is up to all of us to reach out, educate and organize for our schools.

Buy Local…
Spring Break has arrived for many schools.  This means some "free" time for educators, students and families and an opportunity to look for ways to spend money wisely and effectively exercise the power of the wallet.  If you are traveling, try and seek out local establishments that have ties to the community and that value labor.  For those of us staying around town, this is an excellent opportunity to take the time to find businesses that support worker's rights and develop shopping routines that support progressive values. 

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Issue #105- Legal News, Politics, Organizing and Public Ed.



Great News!!!

We always need to hear good news and this ruling gives us continued hope that we will see some justice done in the battle over Act 10.


Politics- The Good, the Bad and the Ugly…
First, the good…  We are fortunate to have 2 competitive races for school board seats in Madison.  While it would be even better to be able to say we have 3 of them, far too often local races are uncontested or uncompetitive.  Democracy demands a choice and we should make sure that we are informed voters who will make wise decisions at the polls.
 
www.thedailypage.com
The bad… Politics are always partisan in some manner, but recently Wisconsin's political scene has degenerated significantly.  While we should remember that the "Good Old Days" weren't always so terrific, we can hope for a return to a time when politicians were able to discuss ideas and find some compromise in their efforts to create legislation and policy for the people they represent.



The ugly… In another example of the GOP's willingness to ignore the voices of all citizens, the controversial mining bill moved quickly through the legislative process.  The long term consequences of the bill remain to be seen, but I find it difficult to see it having a positive effect on either the employment picture, or on the environment in the areas that are impacted. 



Lies Become Truth…
More examples of ways the public is being mislead and misinformed as the battle for the future of our society continues.  These three examples show the direction that one political ideology wants our nation to move in.  In the conservative future we will need to work longer hours, retire later and will see independent businesses devoured by corporations.

Efforts to privatize Social Security and to eliminate other New Deal programs are in full swing.  Members of the GOP are working to scare the electorate using data that isn't always accurate.  


This piece is a great example of how Fox and other conservative outlets present information to guide viewers to accept a specific world view.  The panel speaks about how Wal-Mart "democratizes" our society and how we shouldn't deny anyone the benefits of having a Wal-Mart close by.  As if buying cheap things somehow makes our lives complete. 

They don't miss a chance to attack unions and talk about how unions were once good (to prevent black lung disease for example), but this is 2013 and people would rather have cheap products than work for wages high enough to afford quality goods produced by well paid and fairly treated workers.


As a society we put our money where our values are.  CEO's, athletes and entertainers make millions or more, while those who care for our sick and elderly barely scrape by.




We have a representative democracy, however, when the representation is based on gerrymandered districts then there are serious problems with the elected officials that result.   


Organize for the Future…
I heard a report on the radio that talked about how an individual's spending habits were heavily influenced by their TV viewing habits.  Watching wealthy people on TV makes many of us spend more.  In effect we are no longer keeping up with our neighbors when it comes to consumerism, but are trying to keep up with media figures.  Something that is impossible for the typical individual, or family to do.  Most of us live in a reality that is very different from what is portrayed in the media, yet we often allow the entertainment and news industry to shape our world views.

Part of what unions, and other organizations, must do is reconnect with people on a level that is different from what political or media figures operate on.  People may identify with what they see on TV or at the movies, but they spend most of their time operating in very different circumstances.  In order to really reach people in meaningful ways we need to get the message out that unions or other organizations can have a positive influence on people's daily lives. 

Politics are important, and they are a very visible arena that unions need to have a presence in.  However, they are not the only venue that unions operate in.  Nor are they the most crucial part of organizing.  In fact, in many ways it is a losing proposition when unions try to compete with the consumer driven message that is so prevalent in our politics and media.  The union message is one of unity, empathy and compassion.  Traits which are in direct contrast to the consumerism that calls for each person to try and get the most for themselves. 

In order to effectively spread our message and our values we must rely on direct, personal contact with people.  As we've institutionalized our collective bargaining rights and other union ideals we have to some extent lost the "spirit" of the union.  Instead of a group of people who know each other and who share common goals, we gradually became a part of a bureaucratic process.  This happens because of many reasons and isn't necessarily the fault of any specific part of the union organization or the members themselves.  In some cases it is even because some unions have done such an excellent job of representing their membership.  However, anyone who values unions and collective bargaining must examine their thoughts and actions carefully and look to be more involved and in touch.  The challenges faced by unions in 2013 allow us the opportunity to reconnect with our "roots" and to rebuild our unions into even stronger and more powerful organizations.      


I can't stress enough that unions and other progressive organizations must continue to be involved in electoral politics.  However, it is my belief that the amount of emphasis that unions have placed on elections has become a drain on the money and energy of the members and the organizations themselves.  In addition, the return on the investment hasn't been all that terrific.  Unions that represent the Postal Workers have donated heavily to Democrats, and that hasn't "paid off".  Educators unions threw their support behind Obama and other Democrats and got a new breed of "reform" as a result.  While the argument can be made that things could be worse if conservatives were elected, the reality is that organized labor is being slowly bled dry under the Democrats, or is being quickly decimated under the Republicans.  Until we reorganize from the base, we face a losing proposition under either party.  
Attacking Public Education…
The battle over education funding, and expanding the voucher programs in Wisconsin are an example of how conservatives are framing the debate and using divisive politics to try and achieve what are political, not educational goals.  The goals that most  "reformers" want to accomplish involve making money off education, re-segregating our schools to protect the elite and eliminating the political power of educators and their unions.  Not everyone involved in the education "reform" movement are participating in order to advance these goals.  There are some thoughtful, well intentioned people who are advocating for changes to be made in our public schools.  However, the underlying motives that drive the big money and powerful interests are more about profit and power, and less about students and education. 

Public schools rely on public money, this allows conservatives an opportunity to debate education policy in ways that don’t promote accurate or rational dialog around educational issues.  It also allows political agendas to influence our schools.  Evidence of this is clear in the debate over the current budget.  




We need to support Tony Evers in his effort to be reelected.  Don Pridemore is a conservative education "reformer" who has little, if any, experience with education.  Instead he is just a mouthpiece for the "reform" movement and as state superintendent, it is likely he would do significant and irreparable harm to our public school system.
 

The voucher program is an obvious attempt to undermine public education and to move funds to private educational enterprises.  





The efforts of "reform" advocates to divide communities from their public schools is clear.  Whether it is through proposals like vouchers, parent trigger laws or other similar ideas, or through the continued efforts to undermine confidence in public education, "reformers" are trying to drive a wedge between public educators and families.  "Reformers" are especially focusing on groups that are part of the Achievement Gaps.  They offer "opportunities" to escape the public schools, but too often these are not real opportunities. 

Vouchers for special needs students are one case where there are hidden consequences to taking "advantage" of the "opportunity" offered by the program.  A group of concerned parents and citizens is organizing to shed light on these issues. 




By emphasizing the struggles of different groups and the Achievement Gaps that exist in our schools, "reformers" hope to create a movement of students away from public schools and into private schools.  Yet, the success rates of students who leave public schools isn't as great as what is promised.  The results of these efforts have made many large city school systems more segregated now than they were 60 years ago.


The strategies used to attack public education are many.  However, they are all tried and true methods that have been effective in other venues.  Here in Wisconsin we are seeing legislation introduced to require local governments and school districts to pre-fund retirement benefits, much like what has helped bring the U.S. Post Office to such dire financial circumstances.  



The best defense for public education continues to be an active and engaged coalition of educators, families and community members.  I'm excited to be a part of a group, now known as SCAPE (School-Community Alliance for Public Education) that is made up of members from these different "groups".  This is one of many organizations springing up in the aftermath of the assaults on public education and on other public institutions that have provided hope and opportunity for so many in our society.  I hope to be able to share more about this group in the near future as we work to advance progressive values from the grassroots in Wisconsin.