Showing posts with label April 2013 Elections. Show all posts
Showing posts with label April 2013 Elections. Show all posts

Sunday, April 7, 2013

Issue #108 April 7, 2013- Election Results and the "Real" VAM



April 2nd Election Analysis…
We've come to the end of another election cycle and (most of) the results are in. 





Of course, with the election completed there is always the need to reflect on the results and to try and get a sense of what the impact of the voting will be.  We find ourselves looking for trends and analyzing results in an effort to determine who "won" and "lost".  As I've become more involved politically I've begun to realize just how unreliable election results can be in many ways.  On one hand, elections (are supposed to) give us clear winners and losers in terms of total votes.  However, trying to predict what will happen next isn't always as clear. Determining the mindset of the electorate is very challenging, especially in a state that has elected both Tammy Baldwin and Scott Walker within the past year.  How do we make sense of the direction that Wisconsin is headed in? 

That being said, I do have a few observations and conclusions about the results of the April 2nd voting.

Not enough people are participating in elections.  This is the biggest concern that I have regarding elections in Wisconsin.  It isn't a problem that is exclusive to the Badger State, but with the contentious climate and major conflicts about important issues we need to increase voter turnout.  The turnout in the April 2011 spring elections was not trend setting.  That election saw 34% of voters head to the polls, but the 2013 elections saw about half that number cast a ballot.  This reflects a return to the politically disinterested and unengaged electorate that has been the norm during recent history.  Without the accountability of having to answer to voters, how can we expect our elected officials to represent the people?  The majority of citizens in Wisconsin are failing to uphold their responsibilities to their communities and to themselves.          



Campaign spending is a significant problem.  It is scary to think that spending in this Supreme Court election was on the lower end, when compared to recent years.  Once again we saw spending by outside groups exceed that spent by the candidates themselves and are left questioning the integrity of the process. 
   

We see each other by demographics and organizations instead of individuals.  When it comes to casting a ballot, or to determining the mindset of our community we give too much credence to a small number of people.  This confuses and frustrates the general population and causes division and animosity where unity and community should exist.  All of the attention on a small number of individuals and organizations distracts from the real work that needs to be done.  As a member of MTI as well as a parent and taxpayer I can say that I am able, and encouraged, to make my own decisions and to participate in the process independently.

Educators in Madison should have a voice, just like any other group.  To imply that educators either control the debate, or shouldn't use their strength and influence to try and shape the future of education in our community is not realistic or responsible.  MTI is one player in the debate over education, but by no means is my union the sole power broker in the Madison political scene.  MTI represents educators and the educators that make up MTI are extremely dedicated to trying to improve opportunities for all students in Madison Public Schools. 

Many people seem to forget that a union is a democratic institution and that a union is its membership.  It is an insult to devoted educators to portray us as a monolithic group that is opposed to any change in our schools.  We recognize the system isn't perfect, but also see the need to work together with everyone in the community to make positive change happen for all of our students.  
   

Finding common ground on challenging and sensitive issues is difficult.  This is especially true once we go beyond the personal level and move into the media, or public realm.  Issues like race and poverty are complicated and bring with them a history that bring out strong emotions.  Madison is grappling with these challenges and we need to find a way to bring the community together in order to achieve lasting success in reducing the gaps in opportunities that exist across the board for many members of the community.


The races for school board featured some excellent candidates and also some heated accusations about race and existing divisions in our city.  The fact that we focused as much on the race of the candidates as we did on their message at times is problematic.  It is true that we need to increase the diversity of our elected bodies, but at the same time we also need to make sure that we are supporting a candidate because of their stances on the issues. 

I spoke to many people of different races, genders, economic status and political beliefs and there wasn't a clear consensus regarding the race between Strong and Loumos.  In most cases it boiled down to a concern over the issues of privatization and vouchers.  We are struggling to differentiate between protecting public education and the reality that "minority" students in our schools are experiencing significant gaps in achievement.  The Achievement Gaps in our schools are real, but to believe that expanding vouchers and privatizing education will solve them doesn't hold up under scrutiny.  What is clear is that the Gaps are being used by conservative "reformers" to divide and conquer the educational world so that they can profit financially and politically. 

Race is used by these "reformers" as a weapon to undermine public education and to drive a wedge between different parts of the community that should be united in their efforts to improve educational opportunities and outcomes for all students.  I try and listen to, or read conservative media sources and find that they only talk about educational issues when there is an opportunity for them to benefit in some way.

This isn't to deny that we have a real problem here in Madison and that we have not been a community that has lived up to its progressive, liberal reputation.  There is an unpleasant reality here that is difficult for many of us to accept.  However, name calling or confrontation won't, in my estimation, resolve the problem.  Calling voters racist, either overtly or covertly, only widens the divide and reduces communication between different groups in the city.  I equate it to working with one of my students who is struggling and not completing their work.  I can confront them and tell them that they are "stupid" or "lazy" thus eliminating their desire to improve, or I can encourage and motivate them, hopefully giving them the incentive to change for the better.          
 

We know that racism is present in our society and that it is a deeply rooted problem requiring intense, long term effort to eradicate.  We also know that prejudice and discrimination can't be legislated or mandated out of existence.  It must be removed through communication, cooperation and education.  People must grapple with the reality that we live with the legacy passed down through the years.  This will not change overnight, but with positive effort and increased awareness we can make positive change happen.  


Elections matter, but aren't conclusive.  We are painfully aware of the reality that elections have an impact on our lives, but also realize that every election is followed (often immediately) by another political campaign.  We are engaged in a long term struggle and should celebrate our victories, while gearing up for the next challenge.  





A citizen's work is never done.  In the end, this may be the most important lesson to learn from this, or any, election.  It isn't enough to cast a ballot, citizens must stay engaged and make sure that those who are elected know that we are interested, involved and vigilant.  If we don't hold our elected officials accountable, who will.


In education this means that we must be aware of the small details.  Politicians, by necessity, aim to make large, sweeping statements or policies.  However, the "devil is in the details" when it comes to educational policy.  Small changes can make big results even if they don't make headlines.  When it comes to educating our children what do we want, a political circus or positive results.  Too often we have been getting the show and not the substance and this must change.  Change will only occur with active citizens who are engaged in the process.  Attend a school board meeting, visit a school, go to a PTA/O meeting, get involved.  


De-Walkerize Wisconsin…
Scott Walker has been called many things, positive and negative, but one truth about him is that he is a politician at heart.  This means that he is constantly working to create an image of himself and his policies with an eye towards expanding his personal power and influence.  It is a lesson that many of us involved in opposing his agenda should learn from.  In the end, the conflict in Wisconsin isn't about Walker, but it is about the quality of life and the social, political and economic climate in our state. 

If we are to limit the influence that Walker has we need to begin to learn to let go of the negative feelings that we have towards him and recognize that he is just another in a long line of political figures looking to benefit from their skills in the political world.  Politics can't be personal if they are to succeed in building united opposition to legislation and policies that are not beneficial to a majority of citizens.  By making politics personal we mask the issues and instead focus on the "celebrity status" of those involved.  

m.jsonline.com
Wisconsin's Future…
Wisconsin is struggling.  The legacy of the past two years is one of negative progress and division. State Republicans have a vision for Wisconsin, but it hasn't been successful here, or in other places around the nation.  It is time for the citizens of this state to get informed and speak out about the direction we want our state to move in.  Blame won't improve our status, it's time to move beyond the past two years and into the future. 
        




One of the other challenges that our state faces is the fact that by attacking labor directly, Republicans have made economic recovery more difficult.  In order to grow an economy there should be labor stability and consumer confidence.  Both are lacking due to GOP policies and legislation enacted in the past two years.  


Vouchers and Accountability, and Money- OH MY!!…

These three words make up the real VAM (Value Added Model) in education in 2013.  In eduspeak Value Added Model refers to the use of data to compare individual student achievement on standardized tests over time in order to measure the effectiveness of a district, a school, or individual educators.  While the merits of this use of data can be debated…



the real problem is that it is even a debate at all.  This focus on test scores and accountability for educators has changed the debate from education to data collection.  It is a symptom of why the fight for education is so disheartening for people who really value education and the future of our students. 

By focusing on standardized tests and tying the results to the public's perception of the quality of our public schools, education "reformers" have created a new reality that educators and schools must operate in.  This change in focus has allowed them to promote "reforms" that are geared towards dismantling our public school system, breaking educator unions and generating profits for a small number of people. 

Under the VAM the goals of privatization efforts are realized and schools are turned into a for-profit system.  Here's how it works…

V- Vouchers "Reformers" hail vouchers and other alternative schools as the epitome of the American ideal of "choice".  The real benefit to those who seek to destroy public schools is the use of public education funding to support private schools.  This harms public schools who need significant amounts of funding to meet the wide range of needs that their students bring with them.  Expansion of the voucher system in Wisconsin has been proposed and touted as an improvement in our ability to educate students.  This despite the fact that data doesn't support these claims.   





A- Accountability  This is actually the first step in the process and is based on the "common sense" notion that we need to hold educators responsible for student progress.  Because education is so complex and involves so many students and variables, "reformers" "simplify" things by measuring student progress through standardized tests.  These tests are highly profitable for those who make them and the results are used to show just how troubled our public school systems are.  


As the emphasis on testing has increased, the pressure for students to "achieve" has risen and schools are forced to change their curriculum to meet the supposedly higher standards.  This has the result of driving some families out of the schools to seek more student friendly schools, and at the same time makes the public less supportive of the public schools.



M-Money  It is clear that the leadership in Wisconsin is looking to dismantle public education.  All one has to do is look at the last two budgets proposed by GOP controlled state government.  The impact of the previous budget was felt in districts across the state and the current budget will continue the all out assault on public education.  


In the end we are left with the reality that we must make our voices heard if we truly value public education.  At times it may seem hopeless, and the challenges appear overwhelming.  Yet, we are seeing a change in the public's perception of issues around public education.  By continuing to speak out and inform others of what is happening we can, and will, see the pendulum swing back towards more reasonable educational policies. 

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Issue #107 March 30, 2013- Vote, DeWalkerize WI, Speaking My "Truth"



April 2nd Elections…
If we've learned anything from the past two years, it should be that elections matter.  With that in mind I'm urging every eligible voter to head to the polls on April 2nd and exercise their rights as citizens.




The two statewide offices up for election will have huge impacts on the immediate future of our fight to reclaim Wisconsin.  The race for Supreme Court Justice between Justice Roggensack and Ed Fallone has the potential to decide the fate of Act 10 among other key issues.  



The race for Superintendent of Public Instruction features two contrasting visions for public education in Wisconsin.  Tony Evers is the best choice to lead our public school system.  Pridemore appears to be more interested in privatizing our schools than in leading them.



 Local races feature a key contest for Dane County Circuit Court Judge and Rhonda Lanford is an excellent candidate worthy of our support.
 


With three seats up for election on the Madison School Board, this spring's election will have a huge impact on the way the board approaches important issues.  With the continuing assaults on public education from the state and federal levels and the impending expansion of the voucher program into more Wisconsin communities it is vital that we have a strong school board who will work with educators, administration and the community to protect our public schools.   

Seat #3- Dean Loumas vs. Wayne Strong
Seat #4 James Howard vs. Greg Packnett
Seat #5 TJ Mertz vs. the now out of the race Sarah Manski



De-Walkerize Wisconsin…
As I thought about the upcoming elections I reflected on the qualities of the candidates, but I realized that my attention wasn't focused on them as much as on the overall political climate and the possible repercussions of casting a ballot for any individual.  This has always been something that voters needed to consider, that their vote would put people in office who would create policies that would impact our communities.  It should be obvious that, in a representative democracy, we elect people who best represent our interests, but they may not be "perfect" fits for each individual.  We also face the fact that, once elected, politicians are able to act in ways that we may not support. 

The election of Scott Walker in 2010 made this real for many voters in Wisconsin.  I've gone back and looked at his campaign material and it is clear why it resonated with voters during the election.  Many Wisconsinites cast a vote for him thinking that he was a "common sense" type of candidate who would represent their interests well, yet once elected he became a different Governor than what was portrayed.  Now, as we prepare for another election, many of us are worried that we won't get what we thought we were getting when we cast our ballots.  This concern is reinforced when things happen like Sarah Manski suddenly withdrawing from the race for school board.  Suspicions run rampant and confidence in the process is undermined.

Looming over every race on this April's ballot is the specter of Walker and the conservative reforms that that have swept over Wisconsin during the past two years.  Without the threats that Act 10 and school vouchers put on public educators and community members would our discussions about issues like Madison Prep have been different?  We certainly would be discussing the merits of candidates differently and politics wouldn't be as divisive in many races.  The past two years have created a legacy of bitterness, fear and in some cases hatred that make it so difficult to find common ground and the compromise that is necessary to truly exist as a viable society.

As I read the John Roach article I found myself becoming furious at, what I consider, the unfair and spiteful language directed at a person who I respect and admire.  I also was offended by the tone that implied that race is the only issue of importance in our society and that we should cast votes based exclusively on one trait of a candidate.  It seemed to imply, just what has been said before about public educators, that we are pawns in a larger game and mindlessly follow the directions of leaders who supposedly don't have the best interests of others at heart.  It is also humorous to think that MTI or any public educator entity has such power over our public school system.  If that was the case, I can assure you that things would be much different.  Just ask any public educator about what they would do to change the system and you will find yourself realizing that it isn't the people who are necessarily the problem, it is the bureaucratic reality that shapes so much of what happens in public education. 

I could mention many other issues I have with this editorial, but as I reflected on them I realized that there was something else happening here.  As a society we are spending way too much time dwelling on the past and looking for scapegoats.  We live in an imperfect world and one where social justice is often elusive.  If we are to continue moving forward we must find ways to unite.  If we can't then we face a future where we will refight the same tired old battles and achieve the same flawed results.        



So, we really need to de-Walkerize our elections this spring.  Not by voting based on our support of opposition of Walker, but by deciding to move beyond, or above, the climate he's created in Wisconsin.  Somehow we, collectively, need to realize that it isn't about Scott Walker.  He is only one voice, and one that will be replaced in the not so distant future.  Many of us remember Tommy Thompson's reign as governor.  I always thought that things couldn't get worse than Thompson, but the reality is that someone will always come along to try and make their mark.  It was with no small amount of wonder that I found myself saying that Thompson was probably the best Republican candidate in the past primary for U.S. Senate. 

Instead of focusing on Walker and dwelling in the past, voters need to send a message about the future of our society by choosing candidates based on merit and not on fear or anger.  As a wise Jedi once said, "Fear is the path of the Dark Side.  Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate.  Hate leads to suffering."  It is our job to change the path that we walk on. 


In this election, cast your ballot wisely.  Do your "homework" and learn about the candidates.  But, also never forget that your job as a citizen isn't done after the ballot is cast.  In reality the job of citizen is never finished.  It is up to each and every one of us to hold our elected officials accountable for their words, actions and policies as they work to represent us.  

Sharing My "Truth"…
One of the dangers in politics, or in any larger scale human endeavor, is the fact that words and actions can be interpreted in many ways.  Trust and honesty are vital to the ability of us to form sustainable relationships that serve a societal greater good.  We are facing a crisis here in Wisconsin, and across the nation, and it isn't so much economic as it is something much more important.  When Scott Walker said that our state was "broke" he meant financially, but I really think that he should have recognized that the real break was in a different venue.

What has happened over time has been a retreat from a more prosperous, egalitarian society to one that is secretive and access to opportunity is more exclusive.  There is no doubt that the "American Dream" has always been one that has been much more difficult for individuals of different demographical groups to attain.  However, in recent years we are seeing fewer and fewer "real" opportunities for people and more concentration of wealth and power into fewer hands. 

Trust, security, opportunity, equality…these are all terms that can be elusive to define precisely.  We all have a sense of what they mean, but the reality of the words can be interpreted in different ways.  As a society we are always striving to find the best ways to offer the most for each individual member of the group.

In America we have chosen democracy and an economic system based on a more capitalistic philosophy to deliver these benefits to our citizens.  However, in order for a society to utilize these "tools" well there are some basic needs that must be met.  When we don't succeed in meeting these requirements we face significant problems.  People feel disenfranchised, people lose faith and hope in the system and we see a movement away from the values that our nation is supposed to be built upon.   

The "truth" as I see it is very troubling.  We are seeing a breakdown in communication of accurate information at all levels.   





We are seeing a widening of gaps in economic opportunity with small numbers of people making vast sums of money off the majority of the population.  

www.salon.com
FOCUS | Cheney's Halliburton Made $39.5 Billion on Iraq War


We have been mislead by our elected leadership and made more vulnerable because of their actions. 

We find ourselves struggling to stem the tide and to resist the movement of our resources, human, financial or other towards concentration in the hands of the few.  Unions provide one way to resist these trends and are standing up for those they represent.   

We need more organizing efforts and more coalitions between the people of our society.  Unions, co-ops and other community based efforts will give individuals power to act in their own defense.   

Marriage Equality, Race, Economic Class and Public Education…
History is a series of events that seem cyclical in nature.  We always hear about the need to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past, and it is clear that there are trends that reappear throughout human history.  The late 1800's become the 1920's which in turn become the early 2000's.  We see struggles for civil rights move from specific group to specific group and then back again.  Struggles for freedom, suffrage, economic opportunity, citizenship, etc… all find common threads throughout history.  The names, faces and situations change, but the stories sound eerily similar in nature.

Over the past week a lot of attention has been focused on the issue of Marriage Equality.  Many equate the issues surrounding rights for GLBTQ citizens as the newest in the long line of civil rights battles.  We've seen many parallels drawn between the issue of Marriage Equality for GLBTQ Americans and those that African-Americans faced in the not so distant past.  People have brought up the reality that marriage between Blacks and Whites was illegal until just a few decades ago in many places.  Just check your Facebook and you can see that Marriage Equality is of interest to many of us.

What shouldn't be lost in the modern incarnation of our ongoing quest for a socially just society is that the battles are fought and victory or defeat result, but the struggles don't end.  We know that the Civil Rights Movement didn't end racism in our nation.  Women's Suffrage didn't end sexism.  The passage of Act 10 didn't eliminate organized labor.  The "War on Poverty" didn't result in an elimination of economic distress.    

Humans are quick to try and declare a verdict and to move on to new challenges.  When we do this we ignore the actuality that we are all connected and that our struggles are part of the fabric of our humanity.  The union mantra "An Injury to One is and Injury to All" is at the heart of this reality.  We are facing the inertia of human nature that causes discrimination, inequality and injustice, but is also capable of inclusion, equality and justice in equal measures.  


Most people will act in their own self interest first, and then act for the benefit of others second.  What many of us miss is the recognition that by acting in a self-interested manner we often don't promote the most positive action that would benefit all.  In this way we see people acting in short sighted and often acting against their own interests.  Working class people supporting anti-union candidates, "minority" groups attacking the rights of others to achieve equal opportunities, these are a couple of examples that demonstrate the actions of people operating solely for their own interests.

chicagoist.com
As Americans in a consumer driven, materialistic society we find ourselves swept along in the river of self-interest.  We feel a need to defend what is, or should be, ours and to worry that anything that benefits someone else, by definition harms us.  This somehow implies that there is a finite amount of any given resource available and that we must compete in order to get any part of the desired commodity. 

One can argue that in economic terms this may be true.  We live on a planet that has finite amounts of resources and access to these have long been a source of conflict.  However, in modern America there is enough wealth so that no person should be starving or without their basic needs being met.  Our drive to accumulate is causing long-term damage to our nation's future.

On the other hand, there is no such limit on things like knowledge or rights.  If I learn as much as I can about a topic, that only serves to educate me, it doesn't take away from others opportunities to learn.  In fact, I can use my knowledge to educate others and thereby improve the educational opportunities for those around me.  The more people who are educated, the more opportunities there are and society as a whole improves. 

This same logic holds true in other aspects of rights, freedom and knowledge as well.  Giving a group access to rights like marriage, voting or other basic freedoms doesn't dilute them for others.  The case can be made that by supporting the rights and freedoms of all citizens improves the quality of life for everyone.  Just like union wages raise wages for all workers, so too can providing real, equal opportunity for all actually serve to increase the freedoms, rights and opportunities for everyone in our society. 

Allowing others to have these opportunities is frightening to some.  For example, people may look at the demographics and recognize that White Americans are no longer the majority.  This can lead to fear that by allowing more access to voting the power in America will shift in a way that leads towards an unknown future.  Yet, what is ignored is that our future is always unknown and filled with potential for success or failure.  Holding fast to what we know won't change this reality.  It will make the future more painful if we fight against what is socially just.  The cycles of history have shown us as the concentration of wealth in the late 1800's, and 1920's brought us the events like violent strikes, social upheaval, and the Great Depression. 


In many ways the social movements that have been labeled revolutionary are exactly the opposite.  Revolution implies a radical, sudden change and we often see that the movements that are revolutionary are in reality just the outgrowth of the will of the majority.  They become revolutionary because of the fact that the rules and norms of a society are often conservative in nature and are slow to change.  The struggles become more confrontational because those in power are reluctant to cede any control to others and impose restrictions to slow the changes that are frequently necessary for the long term survival of a nation. 

We are seeing the beginnings of a "revolution" here in America around issues involving many groups and institutions.  Public education will continue to be a centerpiece in this struggle.  Education is vital for each persons success as well as for the success of society as a whole.  Access to quality educational opportunities are necessary and the fact that we are seeing more restrictions to education means that the "establishment" recognizes the importance of this battle.  Educators, families and community members must work together to move our society forward and deliver quality educational opportunities to all students and communities.