Showing posts with label Union Power. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Union Power. Show all posts

Sunday, April 27, 2014

#162 April 27,2014- Education as a Rallying Point



Class, Money, Education 
and Voting. . .
America has long been portrayed as a land of freedom and opportunity.  This is one of the reasons why we have attracted immigrants from so many places throughout our history.  Our high standard of living, and our relatively open society have been a magnet that has drawn people from all parts of the world.  Even in challenging economic times America has been a preferred destination for people struggling to survive in other places.  This has been true through history, and continues even into current times. 

At the same time, those who look realistically and carefully at our history, as well as our current situation, recognize that America isn't a perfect place.  Those who portray America as an exceptional place purely on the basis of our economic and political systems, ignore the realities that exist here.  America has benefited from a combination of many different things to achieve our status in the world.  Some  are physical like our geography, isolated from the conflicts of Europe, Africa and Asia by ocean barriers and distance, our natural resources, and the huge area our nation occupies.  Others are the result of events and actions around the world that allowed our nation to grow and mature with minimal interference from other world powers.  We have been very fortunate as a nation and our growth into a superpower has not been achieved purely by our own “virtues.”  A legacy that includes brutal oppression of those who disagree with the wealthy elite who control our nation. 


The bloody labor dispute of a hundred years ago continues to reverberate in contemporary political discourse.
By The New Yorker

Our history has been a constant struggle between the ideals that our nation is built on, and the reality that the people who hold power in America create for themselves.  While we would like to imagine that our the United States has avoided the inequities and injustices that prompted many of our citizens to immigrate to America, the reality is that our nation has fallen short of the vision that we hold so dearly.  We have seen different groups fight for a share of the "American Dream" and their battles have moved our nation closer to achieving our goals of "Liberty and Justice for All."  Yet, there is always a pushback from those who have acquired wealth and status using the existing social, political and economic systems that serve to benefit their interests. 

These cycles where we advance Progressive ideals and then see  Conservative efforts to return our society to its previous status have been a part of our history and the largest conflicts have a visible impact on our nation.  We are currently involved in a time period of historical implications.  The changes in attitudes, legislation and policies that were made during the 1960's and 1970's are being undone now, in the 2010's.  Some of the most noticeable are the changes in electoral policies, attacks on the regulatory powers of our government, and the undoing of important Civil Rights legislation.  Those who have significant power and wealth are fighting hard to maintain their status as the demographics and opinions of our nation shift. 

Their efforts are designed not only to defend their status, but to eliminate the potential for any significant change to occur in the immediate future.  The efforts are many, and impact almost all areas of our society, but there are some higher profile and more intense attempts that are easily observed.  The efforts to implement restrictive Voter ID laws that will give Conservatives a political advantage which can be used effectively to protect special interests.  Another example is the effort to destroy the power of labor by eliminating the ability of workers to organize effectively.  A third example is the effort to privatize many important services that have been provided by the public sector. 


The end result of these efforts is a society that caters to the needs of a smaller number of powerful citizens.  The impacts of these policies that began being implemented in the 1980's are being felt right now.  They are observable on a larger, societal scale.

After three decades of slow growth, median income in the U.S. trails that of Canada. Poor Americans now make less than the poor in several other...
The New York Times|By David Leonhardt and Kevin Quealy

A new study by researchers from Princeton and Northwestern Universities finds that America's government policies reflect the wishes of the rich and of powerful interest groups, rather than the wishes of the majority of citizens.
Gawker|By Hamilton Nolan

They also have an impact on a personal level that affects a huge number of Americans.  Whether it influences our personal wealth, our health, our safety, or our future, the efforts to manipulate public thinking are catastrophic for anyone who isn't in the top percent of earners in America.

The connection has been "confirmed by many different studies by different investigators over different time periods."
Bill Moyers

They don't like paying taxes, and that's all that matters.
Mother Jones


New AFL-CIO report finds executive pay continues its upward trajectory as middle class wages remain stagnant
america.aljazeera.com

The obvious questions are these, if we live in a democracy why doesn't the majority vote and act in ways that will promote their own interests?  How can a small number of influential people (even with huge amounts of wealth) control a much larger number of people in a place where freedom and equality are supposed to be held in such esteem?


The simple answer is that we idealize the wealthy and strive to achieve the same status as they hold.  We often do this at our own expense, or at the expense of others who should be our allies in the fight for social justice.  We believe the hype about the "job-creators" and we allow ourselves to be mislead by media and advertising that promote an agenda that directly opposes our own interests.    

None of these money-making methods are productive, or praiseworthy, or suggestive of a meritocracy. Perhaps demeritocracy is more apt.
Truthout

A California firm on behalf of an undisclosed client has bought nearly $2 million worth of air time from Sept. 1 to Nov. 3 in four Wisconsin markets.
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel|By Daniel Bice

Another thing that has allowed a minority of citizens to dominate the majority socially, politically and economically is the lack of a unifying force that citizens could rally around.  All of our efforts to advance the values of social justice have been focused on different subgroups or interests.  Labor has fought for the goals of labor and different demographic groups have fought to promote their own interests.  This has allowed for the strategy of "divide and conquer" to be used effectively.   There has rarely been a concerted effort by many groups to unify around the ideals of "Liberty and Justice for All."  We have come close at times, for example under the leadership of Dr. King during the Civil Rights movement, but eventually the movements fragment under the strain of internal and external pressure. 

The Wisconsin Uprising of 2011 had the potential to be an effort that could combine many different interests.  Yet, as we move further through time we see how the difficulty of incorporating multiple interests along with the constant attacks from our opponents weakens the power of a movement based on combating societal injustice. 


The Uprising needs to find a unifying issue that can take the effort to the next level and propel us to further action.  Education could be that issue.  It is important to labor, impacts every demographic group, and is an issue that lies at the very heart of the social justice movement.    

To truly improve education in Milwaukee, we must start with the assumption that poor children are no less deserving of a quality education than rich children. As such, the schools that privileged suburban parents demand for their children should be the yardstick we use to measure the adequacy of edu…
epi.org

In order to realize the full potential of education we need to combat the message of education "reformers" and educate the public about the realities of what is needed to fully accomplish the goals of equitable and inclusive public education.  This means calling out the "reformers" and providing a real view of just what is being done to our public education system in the name of equity and opportunity. 

On Sunday, March 23, 2014 in a speech at Riverside Church in Manhattan, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, faced with declining public opinion poll numbers, made nice to charter school companies and their wealthy...
portside.org

In 1848, Sam Brannan ran up and down the streets of San Francisco yelling, ”Gold! There’s gold in the American River!” Brannan had no intention to dig for gold himself, of course. Just before he ma...
davidsudmeier.com 

NEW YORK (AP) — "Just Do It" has been a familiar Nike slogan for years, but some parents are wondering what it was doing on some of New York's Common Core standardized English tests.
MSN

The health care law may be Republicans’ favorite weapon against Democrats, but the Common Core is also roiling the party and shaping the establishment-versus-grass-roots divide.
The New York Times|By Jonathan Martin

This means that educators need to step up and become active in promoting our profession and making education an issue that can unify the different aspects of the Progressive movement.  It has been a very difficult past 3 years, but educators are resilient and our cause is just.   

The effects of reform on the teaching profession.
Washington Post

The end of collective bargaining.
m.lacrossetribune.com|By Lee Enterprises

The Good, The Bad and
The Ugly. . .

The Good . . . Conservatives and others who oppose virtually everything that President Obama has done are continuing their crusade against the ACA.  They will find some way to spin this in a negative way, but I fail to see how providing ways for more people to access healthcare is bad for our nation.

About half of this is through the exchanges. The rest is via Medicaid and employer plans.
Mother Jones

A great way to send a message, and to support public schools.  Could something like this happen in Madison?

A grassroots effort to support schools grows into a sizable donation.
wqow.com|By Kristen Shill

The Bad . . .  Nothing that we haven't heard before, or that is shocking for people who have been paying attention.  The questions remain, what do WE do to make changes?

A nationwide study of racial disparity has been released.
m.policymic.com|By PolicyMic

The Ugly . . . With all of the publicity about mass shootings and gun violence in general, how is it that nothing seems to improve?  The answer lies in a couple of places, our nation's inability to combat a powerful gun lobby and the NRA is one.  The other is our reluctance to address the mental health needs of so many in our population.  Not everyone who commits a crime with a gun is mentally ill, however, an improvement in our treatment and support of those struggling with these illnesses could go a long way in creating a safer society for everyone. 


Welcome to America, the land of blue jeans, rock & roll, and sporadic meaningless mass murder.
Mother Jones
Medicaid expansion would mean millions more would get mental health care coverage.
Washington Post

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Issue #91 December 9, 2012- Unions, Education and Politics



Union Power…
The assault on unions and labor rights continues to accelerate.  We've seen the pattern that Scott Walker started being used again in Michigan this week.  Rushed legislation and heated rhetoric are being used to attempt to destroy organized labor and return sole control of the workplace to management.  This reality is all the more troubling for Wisconsinites who can safely assume that we will see legislation of this type introduced in the near future.   


What is also frustrating is that the rhetoric used by anti-labor forces seems to be relatively effective in convincing many citizens that unions are an "evil" that needs to be curtailed and/or eliminated.  According to the existing reasoning there are enough protections in the existing laws that make unions and collective bargaining redundant and unnecessary.  The Wisconsin State Journal's used this reasoning in a recent editorial about public educators and their unions.  The argument states that if local school boards and administrations (management) treat their employees fairly then unions aren't necessary.  Of course, if people were honest we wouldn't need judges, police officers, jails and all the other apparatus that goes with the reality that there will always be those who break the rules.  
  

There is no doubt, but that organized labor is in many ways "on the ropes".  Membership is declining.  It is difficult to see much in the way of significant political power being wielded by labor.  Now, there are increased legislative measures being taken to limit the ability of workers to organize.  Many conservatives are gleefully predicting the end of organized labor.    

Yet, unions continue to fight back and work to defend the hard won rights and processes that have served to create a period of relative stability in American labor history.  As is the case during any period of struggle, groups must work to defend themselves from external attacks, while reassessing their own organizations and ways of doing things.   

I, along with almost 1,000 other educators spent last Saturday debating the direction that our statewide educators union (WEAC) will take in the near future.  The debate was spirited and positive with many different opinions offered.  In the end there was widespread support for the initiatives that were approved. 



At the same time, the discussion that took place last weekend, and that has been going on in Wisconsin for some time brought out a few major issues that unions will need to deal with in the immediate future. 

-The larger the organization, the more bureaucratic and top-heavy it usually becomes.  This may be an effective way to organize some groups, but in labor organizations the power comes directly from local groups and individuals.  The model of top-down, large groups doesn't attract as much support as a locally run and easily accessible one.  One thing that was said over and over again by WEAC members was that they had tremendous loyalty to their local organizations.  WEAC or other larger entities provide needed support, but can't provide the personal attention that members require.

-We need to make sure that we are fighting to protect the goals and members of the organization, not the organization itself.  Unions arose because of the needs of workers and can not survive if they are anything but focused on their membership.  If members see that their union is working for them, they will support it, if not then membership will suffer.   


-It was troubling to me that there was some applause given when a speaker at the WEAC meeting spoke about trusting our elected representatives to make decisions without needing to always ask membership for guidance.  This type of thinking is part of what has gotten us in the trouble we are in.  Too many members have removed themselves from the discussions around issues of importance.  Union members must remember that any form of representative government doesn't abdicate the people's responsibility to be part of the decision making process. 

-We have power, and we must not shy away from using it.  Conservatives would have us return to a time when labor served at the complete mercy of management.  Over the years, and with no small amount of blood, sweat and tears, labor gained rights in the workplace.  If we allow the current wave of anti-labor sentiment to succeed we will find ourselves needing to refight battles that previous generations already won.  Defending labor rights is good for our nation and a huge majority of the people who live here.  We can't allow a small minority to shape the future for the rest of us.  


Education- Speaking the Language…
Every profession, specialty, hobby or other subgroup of people has their own language that only the devotees of that particular interest speak.  In many cases this is a relatively harmless and sometimes humorous truth.  Who hasn't sat through an event/gathering with friends at some point in their lives and wondered what exactly was being discussed.  Words that mean one thing in one context can mean something totally different in another one. 

However, this terminology and context can be problematic when the topic being discussed is of importance to those who are outside of the core group speaking the "language".  Obvious examples of this are found in health care and the legal system.  Often we find people looking for clarification of information that they are given, while at the same time they are struggling with a challenging situation.  In cases like this the "language" that is used is a barrier to accessing information and causes anxiety and potentially unnecessary conflict.

Public education has its own set of terms, acronyms and organizational barriers that exclude people from participating in an equal and effective manner.  This institutional "language" creates obstacles that block information and communication between the people who need to effectively communicate the most. 

As part of the "system" I often forget just how complex and confusing we have made our public schools to those who don't have access to the terms and don't use the "language" on a daily basis.  To be honest, it is tough enough for public school employees to keep up with the terms and procedures and I shouldn't be surprised that parents, families and community members are frequently confused and/or frustrated as they try to navigate the system.  It seems like it's human nature to try and complicate our endeavors in the name of simplifying them. 

It doesn't help that there are so many layers of bureaucracy and so many different agencies/organizations involved in educating students in our public schools.  Each group brings its own "language" to the discussions and we often sound like a meeting at the UN when we discuss educational issues.  Added in are the political pressures and the rapid pace of change that is currently the state of public education.  It's no wonder that it often appears everyone is talking, but no one is saying anything.

This was made clear to me when we held our second educator/family/community meeting about public education last week.  I've mentioned this group before and am very excited about the potential for open discussion about issues in public education that this group has.  During our meeting many issues were raised, but some that struck me as being of significance were the issues of communication, transparency and how to clarify what the challenges facing public education really are. 

The group that gathered consisted of a wide range of individuals with significant experience in the public school system.  There were several educators, and all the other participants had students who have (or had) been in public schools for a number of years.  It was a highly educated and very involved group, yet there were many questions raised that showed just how "user-unfriendly" our public school system has become. 

The system is unfriendly to families and concerned citizens in many important ways.  There is a lack of clear and easy access to information about what is happening.  For example, our group expressed an interest in making an effort to attend more school board meetings, yet many in the group talked about their frustration in trying to navigate the district's website to find out what is being discussed and when.  This inaccessibility to basic "core" information is a key problem in shaping public opinion and trust in our public schools as they work to educate all students in a challenging economic and political environment.  

Once information is located it is often difficult to translate exactly what is being said from "eduspeak" into a more understandable language.  "Eduspeak" is a language that is used not only in official district communication (website, press releases, report cards, letters to families), but is also used widely in the political realm as well.  In the end this "language" serves to further distance the efforts of individual educators from the discussion about education that is held in public forums. 

In the end we are left with a public perception that is shaped by the language we use.  Unfortunately, this language is one that is easily co-opted by "reformers" who spin the message to make it appear like they have the best interests of students at heart.  Yet the language used in education policy debate often does as much to obscure the "facts" as it does to illuminate them.  The terms and phrases used are often similar to political or bureaucratic language that serves to alienate those outside of the "inner workings".  



Here's a recent press release from Governor Walker that contains plenty of  "jargon" and no real substance.  This is what the public is getting from all sides nearly every time education is discussed in a public forum. 

Wisconsin was awarded $22.7 million in education grants through the Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge education program for at-risk youth. Governor Walker said, “These funds will support innovative initiatives that will improve quality and outcomes for children as well as create efficiency and accountability within the system.”

If we have difficulty with the language of education we should at least be able to find accurate information and data from research and testing, right?  There certainly is enough data about schools and education available to give us guidance as we try to find the best solutions to the challenges we face.  However, the data we have is just as difficult to use in shaping policies and practice as the "language" is.  Almost every imaginable position or policy is supported by some study or by "common sense" (a horribly overused term that often is used to defend educational innovations).  





When using data on education it is important to look at the source of the information and to uncover all the connections that different groups have to each other.  Many of the supposedly most ardent "advocates" of parental and student rights are firmly attached to for-profit organizations that have frequently failed the very people they supposedly advocate for.  





With all the confusing language, political doublespeak and misleading information, it's no wonder that many families are frustrated and confused.  It appears that these are exactly the emotions that the "reformers" want to encourage.  This allows them to push for "reforms" that will improve the system.  There is also a concerted effort made to divide and conquer by highlighting the failures of a large percentage of students from specific groups (African-Americans, English Language Learners and more) in our public schools.  Then the "reformers" can sweep in and "save the day", all the while obscuring the reality that most of their ideas haven't significantly improved student achievement on a consistent and long term basis.   

In the end educating any individual student is done in a personal and, to some degree, unique manner.  Each student is an individual who brings a variety of needs, backgrounds, personality traits and countless other variables to the education equation.  All of the public posturing and rhetoric about schools and how they should function does little to help any single student, or even larger demographic groups.  What helps one student/group may have the opposite effect on another. 

What is needed is an open and honest dialog about our educational system.  This is best done at the individual level, with conversations between families and educators about the best ways to meet the needs of students at the local, school level.  These discussions can start the implementation of true reforms as the needs of students are brought to the attention of local administrators and school boards.  There is a shared responsibility to communicate between home and school.  Too much blame is assigned without real dialog taking place.  Educators need to reach out to the families they serve to build trust in what is happening in the schools and families need to make sure that they are involved in and aware of what their child is doing at school.  Families and community members also have a responsibility to initiate and maintain communication with school staff.  No single group is solely responsible for the level of discourse that occurs.       

If we can achieve a high level of dialog between home and school, I strongly believe that we would see a corresponding rise in all student's achievement.  We would also see a significant increase in the support for public schools.  In our public school system we have an existing structure that is prepared and able to provide quality education for all students.  Drastic reform of our school system isn't as necessary as many would have us believe.  If we break down the barriers between the community and the schools so that both parties could effectively communicate with each other what a wonderful place schools would be.  At the very least we could avoid the "us vs. them" mentality that is currently undermining efforts to improve the educational outcomes for all students.         
            

Spend Your Money Wisely…
As the holiday shopping season continues on its merry way, keep looking for ways to support local and worker friendly businesses.  Labor in America needs our support to thrive.  Looking only for the cheapest product, or the latest fad usually means that you are shortchanging a worker here in America.  Who knows, that worker could be a family member, neighbor, friend, or even yourself!

The struggles of Walmart workers continues.



Coming soon to a state near you…


Walkergate and Other Political Shenanigans…
Before diving into the latest on the corruption and hypocrisy of the GOP here in Wisconsin I should note that Republicans don't have a monopoly on the unethical and irresponsible use of public office and political power.  No one can claim that there is a clear line between good and evil in our current political landscape.  In fact the partisanship that is found in many political discussions goes a long way towards damaging public confidence in all politicians and takes focus and credibility away from the outrage against the level of corruption that exists in our current Republican controlled government in Wisconsin. 

It appears that we have reached a point where almost anything can be forgiven and almost anything can be attacked, purely on a partisan level.  When a position can't be defended, then an attack is mounted.  An attack that usually ends up with the argument that "they did it too".  This is an argument that should only appear on playgrounds and shouldn't be used by any responsible or credible leader in a political discussion.  We've all heard this level of discourse too much recently here in Wisconsin.  Outrage over the redistricting done by the Republicans in the Wisconsin legislature…the Democrats did the same thing last time.  GOP legislators in the pocket of big business…so what, the Dems are controlled by the unions.  This level of "debate" gets us nowhere in solving the real problems that face our society.

When this type of reasoning is used, the level of discourse around important issues declines, political opinions are entrenched and those who are not politically involved become further disinterested and frustrated by the political gamesmanship.  This results in less citizen participation and more influence for special interest groups and donors.   

It's time to admit that no organization, political party or politician is perfect.  However, while not expecting perfection it is clear that we should be able to expect better from our current crop of elected officials and their sycophantic supporters.  Corruption and greed are never acceptable for any political party or individual.  We elect people to represent our needs, not to pad their own (or an associates) pockets.  It's time that we all start holding our political leaders accountable, no matter their party or political philosophy.    
www.prwatch.org


www.jsonline.com
progressive.org




Citizens need to rise in support of proposals that will improve the quality of our electoral system.  Redistricting that is done solely for political gain doesn't serve the people, just the politicians.  If more people were aware of, and supported initiatives like this one then we might start to see our interests represented in the legislature.  Unfortunately, politicians won't do what is right just for the sake of doing what's right, they need a push from the citizens they "represent".  You can be sure that they are constantly hearing from a small number of people on a regular basis, now it is time they hear from all of us. 



                                     

Sunday, November 4, 2012

#86 Nov. 4, 2012- Election News and Unions



What This Is…
Issue #86- November 4, 2012
In this issue: Last Minute Election News and Unions

Election Updates…
It hardly seems possible, we are only a couple of days away from the November 6th election.  By now many of you have probably already decided who you are voting for, and some may have already voted.  If you haven't cast your ballot yet, be sure to do so on Tuesday.


We know that this election is important nationally, here are a couple of articles about why local elections matter just as much (if not more).



I continue to be amazed at the underhanded and unethical tactics being employed during these campaigns.  I know that there are examples from both sides, but it sure seems like the GOP and there supporters are reaching new lows on a regular basis.





In the end we are seeing extremely contrasting views of what America should look like and the role that government should have in our lives.  I am a firm believer that we need a strong government to protect the interests of all citizens and that government can provide valuable services that the private sector can not.  


Not to mention that the conservative economic strategies don't work for most of us.  


Why I Love My Union…
We are now only a couple of days away from the 2012 presidential election.  By now I'm sure that most of you have become saturated with news from the political front.  I have little new to offer to the discussion so I will take this opportunity to speak my mind about an issue that is of vital importance to me, labor unions. 

This week seems like a good time to discuss this topic because labor unions and worker's rights have, to some large degree, become the "elephant in the room".  This was the case in the recall elections here in Wisconsin as well as during the current campaigns, local and national.  It was Act 10, the law that stripped public employees of many hard won rights, that started the Wisconsin Uprising last spring.  Yet, as the political debate unfolded unions and worker's rights faded into the background for many politicians and voters. 

It is somewhat puzzling as to why politicians have avoided speaking much about collective bargaining and labor unions.  Economic issues are the issues that most voters list as the most important in their minds as they choose a candidate, and what impacts a persons personal economic status more than their job and the wages and benefits they get for doing that job?  We've seen significant historical evidence that labor unions have a positive impact on everyone's wages and benefits, yet voters and politicians frequently chose to ignore this as the recall campaigns unfolded.


In the presidential race and the regularly scheduled elections of 2012, organized labor has been a topic that is rarely addressed.  There are vague references to unions and worker's rights, pledges of support from liberal candidates and accusations of excessive influence of big labor by conservatives.  However, the issue that in many ways "started it all" is strikingly absent from much of our political debate in recent days. 

Yet, these upcoming elections will have a huge impact on workers across America and will, in large measure, shape the landscape for labor in the immediate future.  We have seen that destroying unions is high on the list of priorities for Republicans around the nation.  Wisconsin's public sector unions were not, in any way shape or form, the only labor organizations that have been targeted in recent years.

Here in Wisconsin the fear that many of us have centers around a return of control of the senate to Republicans.  We witnessed first hand the lengths that conservatives in Wisconsin will go to in order to eliminate unions and their ability to represent workers.  None of us want to see a repeat of those events and we are concerned that if the GOP regains full control of our government the attacks will be even more severe.  It is often difficult to see the direct impact of an election on individual's lives, but Wisconsinites learned that elections do matter in early 2011.  The elections of 2012 could have a similar impact. 

The full implementation of the sanctions against workers laid out in Act 10 has been delayed by protests, democratic means and legal action.  If Republicans are able to dominate all branches of government again the results will, in all likelihood, be devastating.  More restrictions on collective bargaining, increased difficulties in the legal arena and the potential for making Wisconsin a Right to Work state all loom ahead if the results from this election favor the GOP. 

Conservatives have done a masterful job of painting unions in a negative light.  Their success has created an environment where many citizens, even those who would benefit from union rights, view unions as an impediment to their success and a threat to our state's fiscal safety.  They point to examples of corruption and find situations where unions have been incorrect or short-sighted in their actions.  Of course we can find negative examples in any organization or group if that is what one chooses to look for.  Portraying unions in a negative light is done, not to benefit workers, but rather to advance a political agenda. 

Over the past couple of years I have increased my involvement in my union, MTI- Madison Teacher's Incorporated, exponentially.  As my involvement has increased so too has my appreciation for what my union has done for me, often without my even knowing it.  I have come to realize how much I value my union and how much more difficult my job would be without union representation. 

MTI has been among the leaders in the resistance to the conservative efforts to eliminate unions in Wisconsin and, because of this fact, has taken both significant "heat" as well as receiving many accolades and tremendous support locally and nationally.  We've become a "lightning rod" that draws attention, attention that is often based on misperceptions as much as reality.  These misperceptions show up in comments after articles about political events, on political talk shows and in other similar places on a regular basis.  People in our community really don't understand what unions do, and why they are important. 

A union is many things to many people.  Unfortunately, in the current political debate we have simplified the discussion to…"Unions are evil" and "Unions are good".  The reality is somewhere in between, but this fact doesn't justify the elimination of an entire group of people's right to organize.  Eliminating unions undermines democracy and is wrong for America.   

Here's what my union means to me (not necessarily listed in order of importance).

Wages, Benefits and Working Conditions- The ability of unionized employees to negotiate for these is the cornerstone of the union movement.  Looking back through history it is clear that workers have rallied around the efforts to organize around these issues and the unfair treatment that labor often receives without formal representation.  The positive impact that unions have had on the overall labor picture has been well documented in recent times, and we have seen the decline of the middle and working class as the membership and influence of organized labor is reduced.  Organized labor isn't just good for workers, union membership in America peaked during some of our nation's most productive economic times (the period following WWII). 

Of course, the ability of unions to negotiate contracts that are good for workers hasn't gone unnoticed by the economic elite.  This group looks to maximize their profits, no matter the cost to employees, consumers, or the welfare of the entire nation.  Without unions, employees' ability to influence decisions about wages, benefits and/or working conditions is reduced and employers are able to exercise their power in setting the levels of compensation and expectations for employees virtually unilaterally.  These wealthiest of Americans have focused their attention on destroying unions and have put their economic and political capital behind efforts to undermine the credibility of organized labor with the general public. 

Management and ownership has used their influence to make the strength of a union, its ability to improve the economic conditions of its members, a liability.  Their primary weapons have been their ability to influence legislation and policy to make organizing more difficult for workers as well as their use of propaganda to create division within labor.  Their political power has been wielded in many ways with the latest, and most blatant being the wave of anti-labor legislation that struck places like Wisconsin, Ohio and Michigan during the past year. 

The "divide and conquer" approach to destroying unions has been an effective tool for anti-worker forces to gain (and maintain) power so that they can implement their agenda more effectively.  Essentially this means that conservatives, corporate leadership and other anti-labor activists use their political and economic clout to spout anti-union rhetoric.  They use whatever means possible to make unions look like the enemy, when the exact opposite is usually true.  They portray unionized workers as lazy, incompetent and anti-American while trying to make it seem that being controlled and manipulated by management is somehow preferable to having a voice in the workplace. 

I have enjoyed significant benefits as a member of a public sector union (Madison Teachers Inc.) in a city (Madison, WI) that heavily supports collective bargaining rights for workers.  I benefit from a set salary schedule, good benefits and a collective bargaining agreement that goes a long way towards protecting me from arbitrary decisions from administrators and ever changing policies imposed from outside forces.  Should this make me the envy of other workers in education and even employees in other fields?  I don't believe so.  Shouldn't my union and the representation it provides be a model for all workers?  Instead of trying to pull educators and other public workers down, shouldn't all workers be uniting to try and improve their wages, benefits and working conditions?

Conservatives would have the public believe that educators and other public workers have been running Wisconsin's budget into the ground with our "outlandish" wages and benefits.  They want people to think that our unions are negotiating working conditions that benefit no one, except for lazy educators.  What they ignore is the fact that our wages and benefits packages have been restricted by legislation imposed decades ago (under the watch of everyone's previous favorite governor, Tommy Thompson).  The also don't see how we have had to fight to maintain parts of our contracts, like planning time, that help make us more effective educators.

The results of the conservative attacks are far reaching and destructive.  We have not yet seen the full impacts that the legislative assault on education of 2011 will have, but the initial results are disturbing enough.    





A labor union's primary job is to represent the best interests of the employees they serve and this usually involves negotiating for wages, benefits and working conditions.  Without organized labor, employees are at the mercy of management, and has few (if any) allies in their efforts to receive fair compensation and working conditions for their labor.  As we face an uncertain future, I know that my union will be standing with my fellow educators and me as we try to defend our rights in the workplace.  Whether in the courts, in negotiations, at the ballot box, on the streets or anywhere else the struggle takes us we are united in our efforts.

A Voice- It is pretty obvious that one worker, standing alone, has little ability to be heard and to influence their overall status.  This is a contrast to management or ownership's power in the workplace, where a single individual wields much more influence.  This imbalance of power exists in virtually all workplaces, even ones where highly specialized skills are employed.  Because of the inequities in power and resources, workers find themselves relying on finding support in numbers.  A union provides a way to organize and focus the power of employees so that they can work towards improving their wages, benefits and working conditions.

This ability to have a voice in the workplace goes beyond the "basics" and also allows workers to have an impact beyond their immediate job sites.  This is especially true in professions like education where educators are often a voice, not only for themselves, but also for their "customers", the families and students we serve.  As more and more "reforms" are imposed on public schools and funding for education is cut from budgets, we find educators on the front lines working to defend a public resource that provides valuable services that are open to all families regardless of race, income, etc.

Without union protection, individual educators would be vulnerable to sanctions imposed if they didn't "toe the line" and embrace all "reforms" that political leaders and distant administrators would inflict on the schools.  Public educator unions are among the leaders in the fight against excessive testing and using test results to evaluate educators and schools.  While conservatives argue that this is to avoid accountability for educators, the reality is that for most of us we recognize the damage that excessive, punitive, standardized testing does to education and students.  Other "reforms" offered in recent years are equally harmful to all who work and learn in public schools.    


        





We also know that in local politics, small special interest groups can have a big influence on public policy and local politicians.  Members of public educator unions are another voice in the argument and often stand up for the disenfranchised.  While it may not be the official "job" of the union to do this, remember the union's first priority is its membership, the protections that union membership offers allow its members to speak their minds about important issues in education and in the community.  As a faculty representative for my union I find myself fielding almost as many questions about community involvement and ways to help our students/families as I do contract issues.  Unfortunately, we are often opposed by groups who are focused on a single issue or who support "reforms" that don't work.    
 





A union is a democratic institution and I'm proud of the way that my union conducts business.  Our meetings are open and we make every effort to have all opinions heard in discussions.  This often means that our meetings run a little longer, or that progress towards a goal may be slowed by discussion, but in the end it is the process and the open participation that results in movement in positive directions. 

This also means that our organizations are evolving and changing as our membership changes and the needs of our members and communities change.  In any discussion this means that the union's position may not move far enough in one direction or another, or may not change fast enough in some people's minds.  We know that there are important issues of equity and fairness that must be addressed in public education (and society as a whole) and that all of us can be a part of the problem at times, as well as part of the solutions.  Through discussion, debate and active memberships unions work to try and navigate through the maze of information and improve the quality of their service as well as improve public education in general.  All this while at the same time remembering that "An Injury to One, Is an Injury to All" and working to protect all member's rights.   

There are times when a union's advocacy for its membership makes it unpopular with the general public.  Public educator unions have been blamed for the Achievement Gaps, failing schools, the Wisconsin budget deficit and countless other problems.  What people often forget is that unions represent people who work directly with students and that the working conditions and morale of these workers mirror the working conditions and morale of the students in schools.  By protecting the educators, unions also work to protect students and families. 

Individually each educator's voice is just a whisper, but united in a union those voices become exponentially louder.  Public educator union members will continue to use their voices to defend public education, our students and ourselves in any manner possible (and even some that seem impossible).  
 

A Safety Net- When I think of my union and what it provides me I get a sense of safety and security.  Not in the broader sense that we often think of a safety net in our society, but rather in the sense of a group that truly "has my back".  The image of a safety net is accurate because I know that I am able to take risks and will be protected and supported by my union.  This can be in a formal, legal sense, or it can be more informal and personal.  Over the years I have seen how a union helps members in many ways.

Unions also are able to provide expertise and defend its members in ways that individual members never would be able to.  Just knowing that there are union personnel out there working to defend us and advance our cause gives members a sense of security and renewed confidence that the system can work for everyone.   




Of course there are also the more immediate ways that a union provides a safety net for its members.  For example, MTI has a "Solidarity Fund" that members can donate to, and receive loans from as their ability or need requires.  Union leadership is always looking for ways to help membership and to provide support for us in our professional and personal lives.     

Cooperation and Community- Along with the concrete and visible support a union provides comes the sense of community and caring that being a member of a positive group brings.  This becomes more apparent during times of crisis, like our current situation.  The challenges that we have faced over the past months have brought educators together in ways that have helped all of us keep motivated in our efforts to protect our own rights and the rights of those who rely on our services. 

Along the way we have become more aware of the needs of all educators and school employees while becoming a more tightly knit community.  Examples of solidarity between bargaining units and different "subgroups" of educators are easy to find and help cement us together as a collective whole.  We are more thoughtful of each other and are sensitive to the different needs that different "specialties" in our profession have. 

That sense of Solidarity, or togetherness creates positive feelings and allows for educators to retain their optimism, even in the face of the all-out assault on our profession and our public schools.  The community of committed professionals that make up our unions give us strength to face the challenges that being an educator in modern America bring.  A statement that I hear frequently from my fellow MTI members is, "I can't imagine what I would do without my union".      

Hope- In the end, this single word can sum up what a union provides its members.  Without hope we would lose our focus and will to speak out in defense of what we know is best for our students.  As in the tale of "Pandora's Box", the lid has come off and the negative policies and emotions have been loosed on the world of public education, but unions represent the hope that allows us to continue the fight.  A hopeful group of committed educators is a powerful force in the struggle to determine the future of public education in America, and unions are the backbone of that effort.