Showing posts with label Gun Violence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gun Violence. Show all posts

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Issue #96 January 13, 2013- Conservatism, Politics, Unions, Ed. Reform and Buy Local



Things That Make Me Go, Hmmm?!?!…
One of the real challenges that we face in Wisconsin and around the nation is the difficulty in seeing the world from the perspective of those who oppose our views.  This is true on all sides of the conflict and creates a situation where we have significant problems finding common ground because our perspectives are so far apart. 

I truly believe that for the most part, a majority of people have the same goals and interests at the core of their world view.  Talk to a variety of people in a variety of communities and I'm sure you will find that we all want to be able to live comfortably and safely and we want to provide the same opportunities for those who are close to us.  We want to have a safe and prosperous civilization that supports our interests.  In order to do this we recognize the need for some type of government and a society that will allow us to live our lives in a way that we desire.

If my premise is correct then it becomes difficult to see just how such deep divisions have arisen in our nation.  I find myself looking more closely at just how we have arrived at the place we find ourselves and trying to make sense of the conservative mindset.  I should mention that I recognize that my political, social and economic ideas are at times inconsistent and probably just as problematic to a conservative thinker, but here are some of the problems I have with the conservative ideology as it has been portrayed in recent days…

-It seems very much an ideology driven by fear and mistrust of human nature.  The world is a very dangerous place and the only way to succeed is through an aggressive and confrontational strategy.  Yet, being aggressive and confrontational creates more conflict, danger and distrust.    

-In addition to the mistrust, it seems like the conservative ideology is driven by pessimism.  We are constantly faced with "Gaps", "Deficits", "Vulnerabilities" and are beset by dire challenges.  All of this in a nation that they call the greatest on Earth.  Yet, if our nation is such a tremendous place, why does it seem we are always on the verge of disaster?

-The good of the few is placed above the good of the many.  Everyone is encouraged to look after their own interests, no matter what that does to others.  If those "others" aren't successful then it is their fault and you have little responsibility to help them.


-Freedom and equality mean very different things to different people.  They are often defined in the specific moment and have little grounding in historical precedent. 

-Economic struggles mean that we cut spending in government, reduce corporate reinvestment in expanding business, yet the majority of people are supposed to find ways to spend more money to improve the economy.  Unfortunately, they don't have jobs or safety nets to allow for them to do this.  Meanwhile the very rich are able to ride out the economic downturns and emerge better off in the long run.   


-We are supposed to trust in the individual, while demonizing the government.  If we don't have a government, are we really a nation, or are we simply a collection of individuals occupying common space?

-It is better to destroy your opponent and silence all dissent than it is to find ways to compromise and collaborate.

-One amendment (2nd) is more powerful than any other.



In the end it boils down to different visions of what America is, has been, and should be in the future.  For me, it is more important that we are able to engage in discussion, work cooperatively to resolve issues and find consensus to create a society where all are valued and respected.  Instead of hiding behind rules and policies that create a false sense of security we need to work to open up our nation so that people are not forced to choose between being an "American" and belonging to one of the countless "subgroups" that make up our nation.  If we can achieve this sense of community (dare I say solidarity?) we will go a long way towards reducing the amount of fear and tension that currently drives so many of our actions and causes us to be reactionary and not proactive.  


Local Politics…
With all the attention that has been paid to politics on the state and national level, it's often easy to forget that there is a lot happening on the local scene as well.  In fact, given the realities of politics at the "higher" levels (Wisconsin's state politics are dominated by conservative voices and the national political climate is the home of big money and other powerful forces) our best chance to have much input is to work at the local level.

In fact, it is at the local level that we can work to influence how the policies enacted by "higher" levels of government impact us in more direct ways.  Local school boards are one example of this.  Because of pressures from legislation and policy from state and Federal sources our local school officials are feeling the pressure to make changes to align their policies with the conservative reformers who are looking to dominate the current debate on education. 

Here in Madison we are fortunate to have a number of quality candidates running in the April election.  While they share some significant similarities there are also differences between the candidates.  It is important that we look carefully at each candidate and work to support their campaigns so that we can have a school board that stands up for public education.  It is obvious that these are challenging times for public education and public educators.  By working to elect school board candidates who are knowledgeable and passionate about the values of public education we can help insure that we will have another line of defense against the "reforms" that are really attacks on public education. 



Madison is an unusual place in many ways.  We are at a crossroads here, as we look to make a transition from a smaller city to a larger urban area.  So many things are changing, and changing rapidly, as our metropolitan area grows.  This is clearly seen in our public school system and in other social service areas.  For years, Madison has been able to present itself as a small city with small city issues.    

With all of the challenges that come with the increasing size and other issues comes opportunity as well.  Here in Madison we can learn from other urban areas and work to avoid the mistakes and pitfalls that have created so many problems in communities like Milwaukee, Chicago and other large metropolitan areas around us.  We shouldn't simply follow in the footsteps of other cities, especially when we can see that these paths haven't lead to success for many citizens.    


Politics, An Ugly Busine$$…
A new year brings new hope, but that hope is significantly tarnished here in Wisconsin.  It is difficult to see just how we will be able to move beyond the turmoil and rancor of the past two years.  The divisions that have been created, nurtured and expanded here in recent years are barriers to compromise and progress. 

The most important thing that we've lost is trust.  Very few politicians or citizens trust their opponent's words or actions.  Once this trust is lost it becomes extremely difficult to navigate our way towards successful resolutions of the issues we need to address.  We hear the words that are spoken on both sides.  Words that call for bi-partisanship and unity, but few truly believe that this year will bring much change in the bitter struggle that has enveloped our state.      



There are several issues that will magnify the conflict in Wisconsin.

The upcoming Supreme Court race will reopen the divisions in our state as we refight the same battles on a statewide level.  The fact that this seat on the court will give one ideology majority control will insure that we will see the worst in politics brought to the forefront. 


There will continue to be a disconnect between the rhetoric of the GOP around job creation and the actions of the legislature and governor.  


The debate over mining in northern Wisconsin will divide our state.  This issue will be used to attempt to break the progressive coalition apart by using jobs and the economic distress of our state as a wedge between groups.  Tribal groups environmental organizations, and others will speak out against the mine and their objections will be portrayed as short sighted and selfish in order to create dissension.  GOP leaders will try and simplify the debate to make it appear that they only want what's best for the citizens of Wisconsin.    




 Unions in 2013…
We are hearing from GOP legislators that Right to Work legislation will not be part of their agenda in 2013.  We can only hope that this is true.  If the legislature doesn't take up RTW in its upcoming session it will give labor organizations an opportunity to recover from the perpetual conflict that has dominated their efforts for two full years.  


This doesn't mean that union members and leadership should take a break (though it would be well deserved) from organizing and political action.  There are certainly many other issues that organized labor needs to address and we can safely assume that this non-confrontational period is only the lull before the storm.  Unions should use this time to learn from the past two years and reassess their organizations, building on strengths and preparing for future struggles. 

One area that unions should continue to work to expand their influence in is in the message that the media delivers.  Too much of the rhetoric and reporting in our media outlets reflects a conservative view of labor.  The message comes across as just plain "common sense", but in reality is thinly disguised propaganda for employers in their effort to control the workplace.

An example of this is in the "skills gap" that is often reported to exist.  According to this thinking, employers are looking for skilled workers, but the American worker is just not motivated, competent or responsible enough to fill the positions available.  I believe the reality is quite different.  In my opinion, if people saw an opportunity to gain employment that would be compensated fairly that most of us would jump at the chance. 

In other words, people will develop skills if they see a market for them, without good paying jobs there is little incentive to pay for training or education.  Conservatives are asking others to violate their principles when they expect people to pay for instruction without compensation that equals the cost.  No conservative politician would ask a business to take this type of risk, and in fact go to great extremes to limit the risks that large business take when expanding their operations.  



Education Reform- Issues and Actions…
With all that is going on in the world, it is easy to lose hope and feel discouraged.  As a public educator the past two years have been filled with strife and turmoil.  However, educators are nothing if not resilient.  It comes with the territory and is one of the major resources that we've drawn on during the struggles here in Wisconsin.  No matter what has been thrown at us, we continue to keep fighting for what we believe in.

In some ways the attacks on public education that have intensified over that past couple of years are a "blessing in disguise".  They have forced public educators to look at ourselves and to really discover what it is that we truly value about our schools, our students and our public education system.  They have also allowed us to find allies and develop connections that we never would have sought out if we weren't facing such intense challenges.  The struggles have also allowed us to call attention to issues that might have been ignored if not for the attacks on public education.  Without the conflicts, many citizens would not pay much attention to issues around student achievement, curriculum or other topics in education.   

One of these issues is the effect that poverty has on our children.  These articles talk about charter schools expulsion rates, but also included are some interesting thoughts about poverty.  "Charter advocates deny that the schools are trying to push out challenging students. They point out that D.C. charters enroll a higher proportion of poor children than the traditional public schools and that poor children often come to class with greater needs than their middle-class peers. Charters are open to all students across the city, with admission by lottery if there is more demand than space available."  Yet, we are told that poverty isn't as important an issue for public schools here?



Of course, we can't ignore the fact that race is an important factor in our education system.  Charter and voucher supporters try and paint our public schools as inadequate for our "minority" students.  Yet we see the same groups of students struggling in all settings (strangely enough they are the same demographic groups that are struggling in society on a large scale.



Public educators work to try and support all students, regardless of their economic, racial, gender, or other demographic category.  The debate over education can be used to highlight our efforts and shine the spotlight on the lack of support and resources provided by our political leaders.  We can also celebrate our peers who are standing up for what is right.


It is up to educators and their supporters to encourage our school administrators and politicians to help make our schools excellent places for children to learn.  Too frequently our schools are set up to accommodate things other than the needs of children.


Yet, public educators continue to be targeted in the ongoing war between conservative "reformers" and progressives who support public education.  The "reformers" would have us create a pay structure that mirrors the private sector.  A structure that favors the upper levels of management and ignores the reality that it is the workers "in the trenches" who really make a district great.   



I must admit that there are times when it seems like it would be better/easier to go the charter route.  It certainly would be the path of least resistance.  Charter/voucher schools are not bound by the restrictions that are placed on public schools and also aren't open to the same level of criticism that public schools face.   


Then I remember that the problem isn't the public educators, their unions or the public school system.  That may be what the "reformers" want us to believe, but really it’s the "reforms" that are doing the most harm to our students and our schools.

Buy Local…
It continues to be important to keep an eye out for business who act in extreme ways.  We know that we won't be able to avoid all spending at anti-labor businesses, but every effort counts.


There are many resources available to help us find businesses that are local and/or labor friendly


For Wisconsinites, this is vital.

Sunday, December 23, 2012

Issue #93 December 23, 2012- Politicizing Tragedy, Educational Accountability, Right to Work



Politicizing Tragedy …
We continue to grapple with the emotions and other consequences of the tragedy in Newtown CT.  As a nation we are struggling to deal with the reality that something so horrific could happen in one of our nation's schools.  While we can all hope that something positive and constructive can come from this event, we are facing the sad reality that we are hearing the same recycled debates today that we've heard after every other act of mass violence.  Events like the one in Newtown should wake us up, spur us to action and unite us, instead they seem to serve as an impetus to entrench ourselves in our existing beliefs and further divide a nation that is already drifting apart.

Examples of these divisive opinions are not difficult to find.  



Opponents of gun control are calling for us to avoid "politicizing" the tragic events of last Friday and want us to continue ignoring the reality that guns are a problem in our society.  Instead of engaging in an honest dialog about the issues around the 2nd Amendment they focus on other issues that really don't have any connection with the issues at hand.     


I am particularly troubled by the ideas advanced that somehow religion in schools could have prevented this event.  As a public school teacher I spend a significant amount of my days working with students on their interpersonal skills as well as building up their own feelings of self-worth.  Along the way I indirectly teach values that most religions espouse.  Things like treating everyone fairly and kindly, respecting each other and the space we work in, resolving conflicts without violence, sharing, empathy and countless other values are a large part of my daily work. 

Yet, as a public school teacher I must realize that not every student in my classroom shares my specific religious beliefs, or even has religious beliefs at all.  It is my job to work to promote these values, in a secular way.  In fact I believe that I am able to exercise my own religious beliefs without specifically mentioning them or promoting them to my students.  I don't need to tell them that they are valuable beings who need to respect each other by using any religious language, yet the underlying message remains present. 

Our society is a collection of different beliefs, all working to try and exist together.  If we promote any specific religion in our schools we must, by necessity, exclude other beliefs from the discussions.  Unfortunately, we are hearing from a number of religious advocates that we should do exactly what our founders tried to avoid.  Remember that our original 13 colonies were made up of a variety of religious ideas that were often in direct conflict with each other.  The idea that historical revisionists would have us believe, that our nation was founded under a single set of religious ideals, is patently false.  Using it in the context of Friday's events is inappropriate at best.  It diverts attention away from debate that could serve to improve our nation's future and potentially stop a future catastrophe.   



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=is2x7QTZ8AI

In addition to the religious rhetoric that is being spread, we are also hearing the usual defense of gun ownership.  It is understandable that people grasp at any way to feel like they have control when faced with such a terrible event.  However, increasing the number of weapons available in our nation seems counterproductive to me.  It resembles the arms race that our nation engaged in with the Soviet Union.  A race based on fear (as well as a significant profit motive for a small number of people) that drove both nations, and the entire world with them, to the edge of destruction.  The costs of the arms race were incredibly high and in many ways unnecessary.  Now, when faced with another threat we answer, not with positive and proactive responses, but rather with fear and an increased sense of impending catastrophe.    



I don't pretend to have the specific answers and recognize that we can't prevent all actions by disturbed and violent individuals.   However, I also recognize that we as a nation can do better than we have and we need to be able to have an open, honest dialog about the role of guns, religion, mental health, etc. in our society.  This extreme, emotional rhetoric gains us nothing and sets us up for more tragedy.

Accountability…
There are so many buzzwords in education that do so much to obscure what is really happening in our schools.  Instead of clarifying, words are used to promote policies and advance agendas that may not be accurately reflected by the words used.  Try to wade through any article, listen to any speech or read a document about education and prepare yourself for confusion and frustration.  It's easy to see why so many people have given up trying to comprehend and instead simply trust the "experts" (many of whom don't live and work in classrooms with students).  

www.progressive.org

The unfortunate truth is that the debate about public education at the higher levels (state, national) is more about rhetoric and less about substance.  Yet, it is this debate that shapes the perceptions of schools at the local level.  The policies and legislation enacted at these levels directly impacts the functioning of the schools in every neighborhood across our nation.  Changes in public education are being driven by forces that have little interest in improving public education beyond looking at the financial costs and benefits.     
blogs.edweek.org

www.journaltimes.com

Accountability is one of the major buzzwords that "reformers" like to use.  It is also one that is clearly misused by these so called education experts.  For them, accountability means using testing and other "objective" measures to evaluate the efforts of public educators.  Schools and educators are held accountable to their "clients" through data and publicizing the numbers that are so prevalent in education. 

It seems like this type of accountability is another example of taking the easy way out of really understanding what is going on in our schools.  As a classroom teacher I can talk about the numbers that supposedly define my classroom.  In fact I could call up a graph of my students progress this year and show you just how "successful" my students have been so far (by the way, my students as a whole performed well on the most recent MAP testing).  Yet, if you were to sit down and talk with me about what is really going on in my students lives and how they are doing it would take hours and hours.  The same is true if you ask me about the curriculum I'm using and the lessons I have planned.  Defining my classroom by scores and standards only gives a miniscule picture of what is really happening there.  Now multiply my classroom by the 100's of others just in the MMSD and you see the problem that higher level administrators and politicians face when trying to hold public educators accountable.  

www.edexcellence.net

Even when you use objective data like test scores to define success or failure there is still significant confusion around the results.  We keep changing the ways that we use data and in all the confusion frequently decide that we need more information.  This results in more testing, more reports and more confusion.  At the same time it results in less time spent teaching, more student stress and less creativity and flexibility in our efforts to reach students who don't learn in ways that are defined by tests and standardized curriculums.   

www.gainesville.com
The best way around this aggravation for those of us who truly care about public education?  To me it is simply getting involved and participating in the discussions around public education.  Involvement and participation go a long way towards clarifying what the buzzwords mean.  It becomes clear that what is said at the administrative level and what is proposed in political circles is very different from what happens in specific schools and classrooms.  The family/community/staff group from my school has decided to begin our efforts to impact Madison's schools by attending our school board meetings and making our voices heard at the local level. 

Attending meetings as a partnership between school and community provides an opportunity for educators and families to see the same information presented and then discuss what is being said.  It allows educators to express directly to families the real impacts in the classroom of what is said by board members.  It also allows families to ask questions of educators and to increase the level of accountability that individual educators have, but also the accountability of the larger system as a whole.  We plan on continuing to attend board meetings and are also planning on focusing on some key committees so that we can be a presence at their meetings as well. 

I believe accountability is a concept that has been used as a weapon directed at public educators.  It is time that we revisited the real meaning of the word and recognized that accountability extends in all directions and to all parties.  Administrators, lawmakers, educators, families, students and the community all have a responsibility to make our public schools better. 



Board of Ed. Meeting…
Here are a few of my observations from the MMSD Board of Education meeting held on 12/17/12.  I hope that those of you who are interested in protecting, preserving and improving public schools in your area will take the time to follow discussions that your local boards are having.  With the changes in legislation enacted by the GOP in Wisconsin, local school boards have a tremendous amount of power in what policies and procedures are implemented in our public schools.

-Maybe it's time to look at how we "employ" our board members.  Listening to the discussions at the meeting it was clear that they have too much information to process and as a result are relying too much on information from others to guide their decision making.  Being a board member means making decisions that are vital to our school's futures and really should be a full time job.  Too much of the discussion reflected a lack of direct experience with classrooms and schools.

-This lack of experience and knowledge means that decisions rest on data and the advice of administrators.  I heard multiple mentions of this throughout the meeting, where board members looked to administrators and other sources of data to drive their decision making process.  It seems clear that many decisions are being made based almost exclusively on these types of information that sometimes come from "vendors" or company representatives who are selling a product.

-Board members want information, but also need to get out to schools and see what is really going on.  Policies and procedures may sound great in a meeting, but what do they look like when they are implemented in classrooms and schools?  I believe that every person who makes decisions about public education should have to spend significant time actually working in a classroom.  Not just walking through and visiting a selected sample at a school, but really dealing with the day to day existence of students and educators. 

-Board members are just as confused by the "objective" data as everyone else.  Listening to them try and figure out what some of the information from the latest MAP testing was enlightening for me.  They have so much information, but it is all "spun" to them in ways that are designed to "guide" their decisions in a certain direction.    

-I don't envy school board members.  They are in a difficult position caught between many forces that are outside of their control.  I truly appreciate their efforts and their service to our community.  Unfortunately, some of them seem to embrace the role that they have been placed in by the GOP in Wisconsin.  I don't expect them to follow the lead of educators in all matters, but there are clearly some board members who are excited to get a chance to exercise the power granted to them by Act 10 (if it is upheld in court) and other legislation. 

-I wonder if some of the board members recognize what the impacts of their words and actions are on public education.  I realize that they need to look at the district as a whole and that their perspective must reflect this.  However, our school board should be the primary defender of our school system.  Many board members seem to understand this, but others don't appear to realize the dangers that the "reforms" being suggested pose to the survival of public education.  They often seem willing to entertain ideas that open the door to more invasive "reform" efforts that could mean the eventual demise of our public schools.      

One clear example of this was the discussion about allowing 26 students to opt out of the WKCE testing through requests from parents/guardians.  Instead of appreciating the rights of families to decide for their children and recognizing that testing may not be the best thing for public education, several board members talked about writing DPI to request a change in policy to allow school boards to reject parent opt out requests.  No one went on record to state that standardized testing and the ways it is used to evaluate schools is wrong and harmful to education. 
Right to Work…
Labor and management have had a stormy relationship for what essentially amounts to all of recorded human history.  In many ways the conflicts arise out of basic human nature as those with power and wealth seek to maintain their status, while those who have less strive to improve their status.  Over time we've seen a variety of socio-economic systems develop and many different philosophies have accompanied them.  In the end, once all of the extraneous details are stripped away, the struggle boils down to this simple basis for conflict.  Sometimes the struggle is quieter and other times we see the disputes flare into heated conflict. 

We find ourselves in one of those periods when the "cold war" that always simmers in labor relations is flaring into a widespread and intense battle.  In some ways it appears that humans have a propensity for conflict and once America "defeated" the Soviet Union we turned inward and began to wage class warfare within our own borders.  This conflict ignited in Wisconsin during 2011 and is spreading to other states like Michigan. 

It is sad to see how quickly workers across America have forgotten their need for the protections that unions offer.  For many, the absence of "highly visible, sweatshop" labor here means that things must be fine and they buy into the conservative argument that hard work is all that anyone needs to get ahead in modern America.  The results have been devastating for organized labor.  


American workers are forgetting some key points and are being fooled by conservative rhetoric that is misleading at best and outright lies in many cases. 

-Right to Work legislation is at its core un-American and anti-capitalist.  By legislating that unions in a workplace must represent everyone, even if they don't pay dues, conservatives force unions to give away their "labor/product" for free.  No true capitalist would ever think of operating a business where they had to give equal service to those who don't pay.  If capitalism is at the core of American values (as conservatives would have us believe) than using legislation to undermine unions' abilities to conduct business is truly problematic.

America is built on a collection of progressive ideas.  The idea of democracy and freedom for all (while limited in scope originally) has grown in our nation and we continue to strive towards the ideals that our founding documents expressed.  Limiting individuals ability to participate in an organized effort to improve their conditions does little to promote the ideals that our nation claims to value highly.  In fact, it isn't difficult to argue, the reasoning that we need to restrict the rights of individuals to collectively bargain simply to promote business interests, or balance budgets flies in the face of what our nation stands for.  We are being forced to confront the question of whether our nation stands for values, or whether it is simply an organized business endeavor.


-While many Americans are uncomfortable with Affirmative Action and other similar workplace/hiring rules, we can't ignore that widespread discrimination still exists in our culture.  Collective bargaining agreements, negotiated by unions provide a clear and concrete set of rules that govern hiring, firing, promotions and wages/benefits.  By unionizing a workforce we can address some of the problems with discrimination that our culture struggles with.  Of course, unions aren't perfect and discrimination can still be a part of any institution, but a contract negotiated with transparency is less susceptible to bias than other types of labor agreements.  


-Workers in America are being told that they have the freedom to choose what type of employment they want and if things aren't acceptable in one job, they should simply move to another.  The reality is that freedom to move from one low-wage/low-benefit job to another is really a very limited form of freedom (if it is truly any freedom at all).  While the wealthy see their options expand, the rest of America struggles to make ends meet.  A union continues to be the only voice that seeks to represent labor in any meaningful way.  



Spend Your Money Wisely…
Only a few more days of holiday shopping remain.  Your dollar is your voice, and the one that businesses will listen to most.  No one who values labor, the environment or other progressive values should be giving their money to businesses that operate in ways that run counter to our beliefs.  Make a statement and support local, worker friendly businesses. 

Walkergate and Other Political Schenanigans…
We continue to hope that 2013 brings justice to Wisconsin in the form of a resolution to the "Walkergate" investigation.  At the same time we need to remind people that the conservative philosophy isn't producing the results that were promised.  Walker will use the media to spread a message that simply isn't true.  Wisconsin's economy is among the worst in the nation in terms of the recovery from recession.  In addition many of the initiatives that have been proposed under the GOP's reign have had little to do with improving employment options for Wisconsin's workers and have instead focused on cementing power for Republicans.  


While Rush Limbaugh is a national speaker and not directly associated with Scott Walker or Wisconsin GOP members (although he certainly has been a staunch advocate of their efforts) I include this article because of the potential conflict brewing between the sovereign nations in Wisconsin and our legislature that will soon offer another mining bill.  We must not forget just how important our views of others are when we engage in political debate.  Many of our legislators don't respect the rights of Native Americans (remember the representative who didn't know that they were really sovereign nations during the last mining debate) and their actions will certainly reflect this ignorance and lack of respect.  

indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com