Showing posts with label Democracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democracy. Show all posts

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Issue #64 May 27, 2012- Recall Info, 3 More Reasons To Recall


What This Is…
Issue #64- May 27, 2012
In this issue: Recall Updates, Attacking the Environment, Corruption and Worker's Rights

Happy Memorial Day!!
Remember to honor those who have served our country.


Recall Updates and Volunteer Opportunities…
The recall races continue to heat up in all areas.  With the ever increasing amount of advertising, propaganda and rhetoric flowing from so many sources, finding accurate information becomes more and more challenging.  What is interesting is the fact that all of the time, energy and money being poured into the media blitz may turn out to be less effective than the one-on-one conversations being held across our state.  So many voters are entrenched in their opinions and it is becoming clear that this will be an election won on turnout, not on convincing voters to favor any candidate. 


So, barring any huge breaking story that emerges in the next week, this 16 month marathon comes down to a sprint to the finish with volunteers across the state going door to door or calling citizens to encourage them to get out and vote.  Considering the stakes in this election there is no reason that anyone should sit this one out and not cast a ballot.  We can't let a small minority of voters decide what happens to all of us.   




Find some time in the next week to get out and volunteer in some capacity.  Talk to people around you and get them to commit to voting on June 5th.  Drive someone to the polls on June 5th, help them vote early and find other ways to encourage participation in our most fundamental civic duty.







We are still hearing that these recalls are a waste of money and an unnecessary, unfair act by a small group of disgruntled public workers.  This is one way that the GOP is trying to discourage voting.  If the recalls are simply "sour grapes" then it is logical, to conservatives, that citizens should either vote Walker, or not vote at all.  Yet, if one reads the arguments against the recall carefully, there are usually contradictions in the material presented. 

Take this editorial for example.  The author uses several examples of recent recalls across the nation to support the assertion that the Wisconsin recalls are bad for our democracy.  In the piece he quotes Diane Feinstein and uses her experience to support his claims.

"But if voters tried to remove everyone they disagreed with, Feinstein responded, no public official could effectively serve anyone. As she argued in the ballot pamphlet for the 1983 recall election: “Orderly government cannot prevail on the shifting sands of a recall brought, not because of any corruption or incompetence, but because of a difference of opinion on an issue.”
Here, Feinstein invoked the original spirit of the American recall movement, which was born during the Progressive era a century ago. Fearful that corporate interests were bribing state and local legislators, Progressives demanded a tool that would allow voters to remove elected officials who were on the take." (my emphasis added)
I guess it all depends on what your definition of "on the take" is.  Republicans in Wisconsin have shown a significant amount of favoritism towards wealthy donors.  While, because of current campaign finance rules and other financial regulations, some of their actions may be technically legal, there is clearly a system where political influence can be purchased in Wisconsin.    

Why Recall- A Recap…
Here's a recap of issues covered previously along with any new information that has come to light recently.     

Political Extremism (Issue #61)
As we lose our ability to compromise and find common ground with each other we lose our ability to choose the best possible solutions to our problems.  Our decision makers and other leaders find themselves taking positions based on the political implications of a situation and not on the real merit of the position.


Even an unfortunate situation involving a public worker becomes fodder for comments about Walker and unions. 


Attacking the "Other" (Issue #62)
The GOP has worked to marginalize different groups in our society.  By dividing the electorate based on specific characteristics, needs and issues our society breaks apart.  Conservatives seek to create a state where everyone knows their "place".    


Cuts to Safety Nets (Issue #62)
Conservatives have painted a picture of government assistance programs as a root cause of the problems in our state.  They forget that everyone benefits from some form of government assistance and that no individual is isolated from the rest of society.     



The Economy (Issue #62)
Privatization and deregulation are not the only solutions to our economic challenges.      


Public Education (Issue #63)
The value of public education to Wisconsin can't be measured in the amount of money it costs to educate a student.  When did public educators become "Public Enemy #1"? 









More Reasons To Recall…
The Environment
Wisconsin has a long tradition of strong environmental activism, highlighted by things like Gaylord Nelson's advocacy and founding of Earth Day.  Unfortunately, the value that our citizens place on our state's natural beauty and resources is being trumped by the GOP's advocacy of profit over protection.  Just like conservative leaders value corporate income more than the quality of the lives of common citizens, they also promote policies that put business ahead of our environment. 

Deregulation- Conservatives say they operate under the assumption that less is more when it comes to governmental regulation of industry.  They try to justify their policies by claiming to know what our founding leaders would want.  However, they fail to recognize the differences between the 1700's and modern times.  They also refuse to look at the history of our nation in an unbiased context that would call current GOP policies into question. 

The reality is that the efforts of conservatives to "shrink" government and reduce the red-tape that businesses and citizens face is a cover for their labors to empower large corporations and the wealthy.  Small businesses and common citizens suffer and see their power usurped under conservative rule.  State agencies that are controlled by conservative leadership side with the rich and powerful and everyone else sees their rights trampled and their environment degraded.

The very idea that conservatives reduce the influence of government on its citizens is untrue.  Conservatives use government power to implement and enforce their objectives just like any other political group does.  We've seen the GOP call for more invasive policies in people's personal lives and any reduction in individual rights is harmful to our freedom as individuals.  The illusion that the GOP is for small government gets votes, but they are based on misleading propaganda.

Here in Wisconsin we are beginning to see the negative effects of deregulation in many ways.  The environment is one area where we will see a significant amount of serious problems created by the reduction in protections and regulation as Walker's agenda is implemented.  We can't forget that government regulation is one of our strongest defenses against those who want to make immediate profits at the long term expense of our natural resources and environment.      












Mining- The debate over mining in northern Wisconsin provides an excellent example of the problems that the conservative agenda poses for our state.  Limited government is not necessarily a bad thing, I fully accept the argument that there are things that government does well and things that are better done by the private sector. 

What I can't agree with is the idea that jobs are more important than our environment.  That's where government comes in.  Businesses operate to provide goods or services that will make a profit.  In order to make a profit they must find a way to make their product at a cost that allows them to make money on the sale.  This means that their motivation isn't to look at the long term effects of their actions on the people they employ or the environment they operate in.  While it may benefit a business to protect workers or natural resources in order to maintain the long term viability of their industry, there is no guarantee that they will do so in the short term.  A non-biased public sector provides a different perspective that looks out for those outside of management and shareholder groups. 

The mining bill in Wisconsin was designed to cut through the process and weaken the protections that governmental regulations provide.  While it may have created jobs, the potential havoc it could release threatened our state's long term environmental and economic health.  The debate over this issue was partisan and fierce and I won't revisit all the arguments for and against here.  What I do want to mention is the example that the bill provides us of just how divided our state is.

In their zeal to pass the mining bill the GOP legislature was willing to overlook environmental concerns, residents concerns, violate treaty agreements and generally run roughshod over the legislative process.  Because of their majority in all branches of government their prospects for success were strong, that is until one GOP senator stood in the way and cast his vote based on his opinion and not just on party lines. 

It is important to remember that an unsuccessful recall will likely mean a return of the mining bill and other similar legislation that will harm our environment, weaken worker's rights and empower the wealthy and corporate leadership in Wisconsin.
    

Undemocratic Policies and Corruption
There are always two (or more) sides to an issue.  One of the major benefits of our system of government is that we get to hear many opinions and debate over issues that affect all of us.  Our political process also is designed to insure that people with different viewpoints are allowed to have an influence on the outcomes of policy and legislative debates.  This makes our "progress" towards "solving" any problem challenging and sometimes painfully slow.  However, it also protects the rights of our citizens and allows for compromises to be reached.

Our government in Wisconsin is failing because of the extreme views of a small number of people occupying important offices in our state's government.  Conservative majorities in all branches of government have allowed for these individuals to squelch debate and impose their agenda on our state unilaterally.  Discussion and debate has become a formality, or even been eliminated as the GOP steamrolls its way towards inflicting their policies on the rest of us.  Images of Rep. Barca being ignored while the roll is called, assembly members meeting with constituents outside the windows of their offices and countless other events will leave a lasting mark on our state's history.   

Of all the reasons that a recall is valid, this blatant disregard for our democratic traditions and the undermining of our system of government is one that cuts through existing political, social and economic beliefs.  Wisconsinites have a tremendous amount of pride in the reputation that our state has for honest and open government.  The events of the past months have undermined many citizen's confidence in their government and has degraded Walker's "reforms" in the eyes of many people.  Wisconsin residents may have many differing views of the policies and legislation enacted under Walker's administration, but few can support the methods used in putting them in place.   

Republicans have frequently used the issue of a candidate's character to attack Democratic candidates, but now face the prospect of defending one of their own against a number of legitimate ethical questions.  Diehard conservatives will try and ignore, discredit or justify the actions of their leaders, but the rest of Wisconsin needs to pay attention to how Walker and GOP lawmakers "do business".



John Doe-  The "Walkergate" scandal has drawn comparisons to Nixon's Watergate in more ways than name only.  Essentially the allegations center around campaign violations and embezzlement of funds from several sources.  Several Walker associates have already been convicted on charges stemming from the investigation and more are currently either facing charges or have received immunity for their testimony. 

As of this moment Walker has not been officially charged with anything and claims that he is not the target of the investigation.  However, he does have a legal defense fund established and the rest of the story has yet to unfold.  To paraphrase Howard Baker's comments about Nixon during Watergate, we all wonder what Walker knew and when he knew it.  It is difficult to believe that the individuals who have been charged already acted completely on their own.  At the very least the governor used poor judgment in who he employed in his campaign,  judgment that continues to be called into question in his administration.     











Campaign Financing- There is little doubt that our current campaign financing rules and the way money influences elections are of concern to many citizens.  The amount of money that is spent essentially trying to buy elections is troubling at the very least.  Citizens United opened the door and big money donations and Super Pacs have taken advantage of the rules.  I recognize that neither party is innocent in this, but Walker has taken political fundraising into uncharted territory here in Wisconsin. 

The influence of big money in our electoral process reduces the influence that large numbers of people have in our government and puts power in the hands of a few wealthy individuals or groups.  These political donors use their financial resources to sway politicians and to create conditions that favor their interests.  Conservatives have proven very adept at playing this game, while other special interest groups that represent larger groups of people (unions) have invested money with less favorable results.  For any conservative readers who don't recognize this and continue to claim that public sector unions are "running the show" in Wisconsin just look at the wage controls and cuts to education that have been imposed here.  If educator unions wielded such significant power would we have a QEO that limits increases in wages and benefits here?

Equally troubling are the issues raised by where the money is coming from.  Walker wants us to believe that out of state money is flooding in to support Democrats, but wants us to ignore the sources of his own donations.  If Walker's policies are so great for our state, why does a majority of his money come from outside Wisconsin?

The result of all the money in political campaigning is a tidal wave of negative ads with questionable validity to their messages.  The big money has turned our elections into mudslinging feeding frenzies played out in 30 second snippets.  Complicated issues are reduced to sound bites and slogans while the electorate is left dazed, confused and frustrated.  By flooding the airwaves with advertising, Walker hopes to drown out the real messages of this recall effort. 










Misinformation- $7.5 million in damages to the capitol, jobs created or jobs lost, Walker's "reforms" to education are working, out of state protestors… I could continue all day with the different "facts" thrown out by the GOP here in Wisconsin.  What all the propaganda spread by the Walker administration has done is confused and mislead the people of this state.

Once again this is an area that no single party has sole ownership of.  The joke that you can tell a politician is lying because his/her lips are moving is an old one.  However, Walker again has raised (or lowered) the bar to new heights (lows).  We are dealing with issues that have multiple solutions and citizen deserve the truth as they try to make decisions about which policies they should support with their votes.       









Undermining Democratic Traditions and Institutions- As I've mentioned many times before, democracy is a slow and often boring process.  Watching committee hearings, legislative debate or reading legislation isn't something that most people find exciting.  However, the past months have shown us the impact that these "boring" things can have on our lives.

Scott Walker and his fellow elected GOP officials have demonstrated what a group of people with a single-minded purpose and virtually unlimited power can do to our democracy.  The apparently subtle changes that have been made have changed the way our state government works and created an executive branch with significantly increased power. 


The other branches of government have also been affected and we will be suffering the effects of these conservative actions for the foreseeable future.  That these changes have been implemented so quickly adds even more importance to the recall elections as we work to stem the conservative tide. 



Worker's Rights
I've saved the discussion of the attacks on worker's rights to the end because, while it is likely that none of the push-back to Walker's agenda would have occurred without them, they provide a great example of how divided our state is.  Anti-union sentiment is a powerful tool in the GOP's arsenal as they use union wages and benefits to create a sense of envy among workers who are facing difficult economic times.  The struggles of workers and their families are used to divide the electorate and to focus attention on unions and not on policies that favor management. 


In our modern world, the argument goes, unions are no longer necessary.  The conditions that lead to the creation of the large labor unions no longer exist here and unions only stay around to benefit a few workers.  Conservatives also argue that unions are anti-democratic and anti-capitalistic.  The GOP would have us believe that if unions weren't in the way or economy would be stronger and we wouldn't be losing jobs to workers in other countries.  They talk about how union dues are taken from workers as though it is a form of robbery.

The reality is quite different from what conservatives want workers to believe.  In an ideal world management would look out for employees and put the interests of all people in a company or organization ahead of anything else.  We all know that this isn't the case.  Management's job in every setting is to get as much out of workers while reducing labor costs as much as possible.  This is true in public and private sectors. 


Unions provide a balance to management's power.  Each individual worker has little, if any, bargaining power.  Collectively workers are able to influence their wages, benefits and working conditions beyond anything they could hope to accomplish alone.  It is through the struggles of workers and their unions that we have been able to achieve many improvements in working conditions.  People have fought and died to try and gain power in their workplace.


We spend much of our time on the job so it only makes sense that working conditions have a huge impact on each individual's quality of life.  Gains for workers driven by union actions have been responsible for moving our nation forward and improving the conditions of all workers.  Unfortunately, these things that benefit workers cut into the profit margins and salaries of upper management.  Thus, unions have become a favorite target of conservative politicians supported by wealthy donors.

Conservatives can say what they will about their desire to protect a worker's right to choose whether to belong to a union or not, but the real motivation behind destroying unions are the political and economic challenges that organized labor poses to the power of management.  A world without organized labor is a scary one for employees.  It is a world where workers are at the complete mercy of their employer and work menial jobs for subsistence wages with little hope for advancement.



Eliminating public sector unions is one of the main goals of the Walker administration.  Public sector unions are one of the last obstacles in the way of conservative's efforts to change the labor landscape here and across the nation.  These unions provide organization and financial backing to the resistance against Walker's agenda.

Public sector unions are more than political and economic animals.  My union, Madison Teachers Inc., has represented its members in so many different ways.  The benefits of belonging to a union go beyond the financial (wages and benefits) that conservatives rail against.  MTI provides support and protection for educators as they work to improve the quality of education that students receive.  Educators in Madison know that they can turn to their union for advice, protection and support and this allows us to be strong advocates for public education.  MTI provides the organization that educators use to improve their efforts to become better at what we do.      

The fact that conservatives see unions in such simple terms, limited to financial issues and basic legal protections, speaks to the conservative view of the world.  Educators see things differently.  We want good working conditions for ourselves, but also recognize the ways that our needs must be balanced with the needs of the students and families that we serve. 

The attacks on elementary educator planning time that happened last year in Madison provide an excellent example of how educators and their unions try to maintain that balance.  Essentially, the district wanted to use the newly bargained contract to take the large chunks of planning time that educators had on Mondays for district mandated professional development.  The planning time taken would be moved to half hour blocks in the morning before school and educator hours would be changed so that we would be officially "off duty" 15 minutes after students leave school.  Madison elementary educators rose up and said that this wasn't reasonable for us, or for our families.  The changes would reduce family access to educators and would even impact student safety.  Because our union helped us organize we were able to stop these changes from going ahead (but still lost significant Monday afternoon planning time to PD and mandated meetings).        
 
As union membership has declined, so have conditions for workers here in the United States.  Wages have gone down, benefits have decreased, hours have increased and working conditions have worsened.  With the economic struggles we are experiencing, workers are told that any job is a good job and they shouldn't complain because so many are unemployed.  If we follow the current trends we could see our labor conditions begin to resemble the 19th century and not the 21st.  There is no doubt, that the GOP in Wisconsin is ready to unveil even more "reforms" to help make Wisconsin more attractive for business.  Unfortunately, what makes our state attractive to business makes it incredibly ugly for workers.        








Sunday, February 19, 2012

Issue #50- Thomas Paine 2012 and Calvin Coolidge


What This Is…
Issue #50- February 19, 2012
In this issue: Recalls and Elections, America's Dual Personalities- Money or Virtue

Recalls and Elections…
There is no doubt in my mind but that we are currently engaged in a crisis that challenges the continued existence of democracy as we know it in America.  Democracy is a well loved and little understood aspect of our society.  We are fond of talking about what American Democracy means.  We are constantly reminded of what our democratic traditions are and what our "Founding Fathers" intended when they created the framework that guides our political system.

Conservatives are especially fond of using our history as a "tool" to justify and/or guide their policies, words and actions.  However, history isn't a sound bite.  It is a collection of knowledge imbedded in a larger context.  Take for example the famous words of Thomas Paine written in December, 1776, " THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman."  Many of us know these words, but Paine continues on and has a great deal more to say about the situation he finds himself and his fellow colonists in.  I've put some of these quotes (from the same written work) throughout the following discussion on the current political situation in Wisconsin.  

The past year has seen important events occurring at a frantic pace.  The outcomes of these events remain to be seen, but what has unfolded here in Wisconsin is extremely troubling in nature.  The assaults on our democratic institutions and traditions have taken on many forms. 

The separation of powers and the checks and balances (both Constitutional and political) that have protected the rights of the citizens of Wisconsin have been weakened and/or ignored.
-The powers of the executive branch have been increased in a variety of ways that undermine the ability of the other two branches of government to control the executive.
-There has been blurring of the lines between the branches of government and evidence of unethical cooperation between the branches has been observed and documented.
-We've seen the effect of one party dominance of all three branches when the majority party wishes to ignore or trample over opposing viewpoints.
-Minority party members have been excluded from the decision making process and have not been allowed to have a voice in the crafting of legislation and policy.
-Party affiliation has become more important than considering an issue based on its merit and impact.

The ability of the common citizen to communicate with their elected officials and to exert influence in the political process has been restricted.
-The passage of a restrictive voter ID law disenfranchises some voters.
-A small number of well connected (and well financed) individuals have disproportionate influence on the policies and legislation that is considered and enacted by our elected officials. 
-Access to public buildings and public officials has been restricted or denied.
-Meetings and debates are held behind closed doors, at odd hours or in inconvenient places that benefit a few and not the many.
-Public debate has been eliminated, restricted or limited in nature with the people on the outside of the process looking in.





Actions of the government have targeted specific groups or interests and have been aggressively destructive to those groups/interests.
-The needs/wants of the minority have been promoted over the interests of the majority. 
-Groups like public workers and organized labor have become scapegoats for the problems that we face in Wisconsin.




(Mis)Information has been used to divide the people of Wisconsin as well as to create an atmosphere of crisis and panic.
-Data is used to manufacture a crisis and enact legislation one year, while similar data is used in different ways the following year.
-There is an active effort to pit different groups against each other to shift attention away from the actions of the political leadership.
-Political messages and other means of communication are designed to mislead the public and confuse people so that they vote against their own interests.

"But, before the line of irrecoverable separation be drawn between us, let us reason the matter together: Your conduct is an invitation to the enemy, yet not one in a thousand of you has heart enough to join him. Howe is as much deceived by you as the American cause is injured by you. He expects you will all take up arms, and flock to his standard, with muskets on your shoulders. Your opinions are of no use to him, unless you support him personally, for 'tis soldiers, and not Tories, that he wants."  -Paine
The type of political/social/economic climate is not unique to Wisconsin in the 2010's.  We've seen these things happen throughout the history of our state and nation.  All political parties and interest groups actively work to promote policy and legislation that will benefit their needs the most.  What is different about the current situation we find ourselves in is the scale of the attacks and the willingness of the conservatives here to go to nearly any length to promote their agenda. 


The results of the methods used by the GOP in Wisconsin are a divided state and a government that is unable to perform its duties in a responsible manner.  Up until recently we had what I believe to be one of the better imperfect political systems around.  The fact that a majority of people would express some form of displeasure with their government, while at the same time being able to function within the framework provided by our government was a positive thing.  Our leaders were able to work together and compromise in ways that, while not ideal at times, were at least functional.  I say this while recognizing the difficulties, challenges and inherent unfairness that were a part of the system.

Under the current conditions we see a reversal in the ability of our government to govern.  Rabid partisanship along with the apparent indifference to general public opinion have made it so our governing bodies are mired in perpetual arguing with little ability to influence their opposition's opinion.  The "debate" over the budget repair bill is an example of how the system failed.  The recent legislative sessions, or any recent Supreme Court ruling provide us with additional fodder for my argument.  More time is spent placing blame than is spent governing.   


After the ability to have their opinions heard were reduced/eliminated and after seeing the majority party trample the minority party's efforts to influence legislation the common citizen had very few options left to exert influence on the political system.  The results have been the mass protests and the recall efforts that engulfed Wisconsin over the past year.  I think that most of us would argue that protests and recalls are not the best way to govern a state.  They are the symptoms of a divided state and a political system that has failed to represent the people.

However, they are also the symptoms of a rebirth in democratic values and a reawakening in political activism.  Activism that is necessary to reverse a gradual process where a small number of citizens have purchased enough political power to effectively create a government that caters to their needs more than it represents the people.  The people of Wisconsin have seen the future as it could be under this type of government and have resoundingly spoken out to change that future for the better. 

"…a generous parent should have said, "If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace;" and this single reflection, well applied, is sufficient to awaken every man to duty."  -Paine

To those who say that the recalls and protests were unnecessary, overly negative and/or undemocratic I ask what would you offer as the alternative.  Those of us who participated in these activities see them as the last recourse to a government that has become increasingly unresponsive to the needs of the people it is supposed to represent.  A government that was not only unresponsive, but also antagonistic towards the needs and rights of many of its citizens.  Protests and recalls are not a new way of governing, nor are they a method of political action that should become the norm.  Rather they are the attempt of a large number of people to peacefully reclaim a system that has failed them.


               
A legitimate question that is raised by the events of the past year involves looking at what the future holds.  Has American style, representative democracy become a system that is unable to cope with the current political situation?  I strongly believe that our political system is capable of adapting to the ever changing environment it exists in.  However, in order for democracy to continue to be viable here the citizens must continue to work to return the power of government to its rightful owners, the people.

"Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value."  -Paine   

There are three main pillars of democracy that must be restored and maintained.

Elections that are free of corruption and that are accessible to all eligible voters.







Equal representation for all and an elimination of the unjust influence of the wealthy on our political system.




A free and independent press or other media sources that provide accurate information to the public.

With these pillars in place we can return to a more manageable system where the interests of the governed can be reasonably debated, discussed and met by informed and reasonable policy/legislation.  If we can't control the hysteria and partisanship we will be left with governmental policy that swings wildly like a pendulum.  A government where the group in power works to maintain power at all costs while other groups wait their turn to handle the reins.  A government of extremes and one that divides not unites.

'Tis surprising to see how rapidly a panic will sometimes run through a country. All nations and ages have been subject to them. … Yet panics, in some cases, have their uses; they produce as much good as hurt. Their duration is always short; the mind soon grows through them, and acquires a firmer habit than before. But their peculiar advantage is, that they are the touchstones of sincerity and hypocrisy, and bring things and men to light, which might otherwise have lain forever undiscovered. In fact, they have the same effect on secret traitors, which an imaginary apparition would have upon a private murderer. They sift out the hidden thoughts of man, and hold them up in public to the world."  -Paine

No one side is innocent of political maneuvering.  Because of the bitter feelings and vicious nature of the political actions of the past year it is natural for the minority party to want to simply reverse the actions of the party that held the majority previously.  However, we must remember that we can never just go back to the way it was before.  Instead of looking for a "return to normalcy" we should use the current situation as a springboard to create a better future.  A future where all groups are able to be heard.  One where citizens take an active role in creating a positive government.  One where elected officials are held accountable not by threats after the fact, but by proactive collective action.

"Mutual fear is the principal link in the chain of mutual love, and woe be to that state that breaks the compact."

"There are persons, too, who see not the full extent of the evil which threatens them; they solace themselves with hopes that the enemy, if he succeed, will be merciful. It is the madness of folly, to expect mercy from those who have refused to do justice; and even mercy, where conquest is the object, is only a trick of war; the cunning of the fox is as murderous as the violence of the wolf, and we ought to guard equally against both"       -Paine





The Cost of Doing Business…
We have a significant philosophical dilemma here in America.  On one hand we trumpet the power of our capitalistic economy.  There is no doubt that Americans are driven by consumerism and materialism.  Our economic power has been a source of pride for Americans and a justification of our status as a world power.  Our economic wealth and vast resources have allowed us to be a dominant player in world politics and allowed us to exert our influence far beyond our borders.

At the same time there is a countering drive in the American mind.  Along with our materialism we have a long history of moral and/or religious destiny.  America is often portrayed (usually by Americans or our close allies) as a "shining city on a hill", a place of exceptional virtue that serves as a model for the rest of the world to follow.  While it is certainly arguable that our strong conviction in our moral superiority is misplaced, the legacy of America as an extraordinary place in the world has been widely promoted.

Calvin Coolidge is a president who, while achieving little long lasting celebrity, certainly articulated these often conflicting views of America through his words and actions.  He rose to national prominence in part through his role in supporting management during the Boston Police Strike of 1919.  Yet at the same time he was considered a strong advocate of the middle class by some.  He advocated for a reduction in the Federal government with more power given to local governments.  He was known by the nickname, "Silent Cal", yet he provides us with one of the best speeches that show the dual nature of American values.

In January, 1925 he spoke to the American Society of Newspaper Editors and said,  “After all, the chief business of the American people is business. They are profoundly concerned with producing, buying, selling, investing and prospering in the world. I am strongly of the opinion that the great majority of people will always find these the moving impulses of our life.”  This quote has been widely shared as, "The business of America is business," and has been used to promote our economic policies in many ways.

However, later Coolidge also said, “Of course, the accumulation of wealth cannot be justified as the chief end of existence.  But we are compelled to recognize it as a means to well-nigh every desirable achievement. So long as wealth is made the means and not the end, we need not greatly fear it...But it calls for additional effort to avoid even the appearance of the evil of selfishness. In every worthy profession, of course, there will always be a minority who will appeal to the baser instinct. There always have been, probably always will be, some who will feel that their own temporary interest may be furthered by betraying the interest of others.”

"We make no concealment of the fact that we want wealth, but there are many other things that we want very much more. We want peace and honor, and that charity which is so strong an element of all civilization. The chief ideal of the American people is idealism. I cannot repeat too often that America is a nation of idealists. That is the only motive to which they ever give any strong and lasting reaction."

We have seen American policy struggle with these two visions.  On the one hand attempting to promote our business interests and exert our economic power, while on the other hand attempting to try and occupy a moral high ground.  Too often (in my opinion) our stance as a moral power has been a thin veneer used to justify actions which have promoted our economic and political power.  As a nation we have found that it is very difficult to mix money and morality.  Instead we find ourselves losing our idealism and falling victim to the quest for financial success and political power. 

This struggle continues into modern day Wisconsin.  On one hand we have leadership which claims to have high moral standards based on their religious ideals.  Yet this same leadership is beholden to financial interests and finds itself promoting money over other considerations.  There is no doubt but that our financial well being is important.  In today's world it is necessary to have strong financial standing in order to survive and thrive.  However, in my opinion we have crossed a line and are now pursuing financial goals above all others.  We have a situation where it is considered not only acceptable, but desirable to acquire wealth beyond what is necessary to survive.  "Conspicuous consumption" has become a driving force that leads us to further and further excesses.  As Coolidge said in 1928, "The requirements of existence have passed beyond the standard of necessity into the region of luxury."  Then reality hit in 1929. 

I see this emphasis on financial interests are problematic in many ways.

We emphasize big money over all else.
Our politicians are spending a great amount of time and energy trying to entice large employers to locate their operations in our state.  They are willing to trade virtually anything to get a big company to come to Wisconsin.  Don't misunderstand me, I see the need to have large scale industry here.  However, we are allowing ourselves to be "blackmailed" by these companies.  We offer tax breaks and other deals to make Wisconsin seem more desirable and in return get few if any concessions from business.  While we do this the real backbone of our economy, smaller business and the middle class, is ignored and crushed.



At the same time we also ignore the long term impacts of current economic decisions.  We also overlook the moral and ethical issues that surround our actions.  Everything can be justified if it means a big employer gets what they need.






Big money leads to big corruption.
If absolute power corrupts absolutely than it stands to reason that large amounts of money would lead to large amounts of corruption.  That certainly appears to be the case here in Wisconsin.  Hypocrisy and greed are thriving here as everyone tries to get a little more of the economic pie.



The Wisconsin Retirement System may be one of the next "cash cows" to get milked here unless we can generate enough political capital to counter the effort.


Basic economics is either misunderstood or ignored.
All of these factors boil down to a basic flaw in the theory of "Trickle-down Economics".  In order for the economy to thrive we need to have a strong consumer base.  By consolidating the wealth of the nation at the top of the economic ladder we lose the foundation that supports the economy.  By cutting out the rungs that allow people to climb the economic ladder we further weaken the structural integrity of our economy.  We have seen this on a national level and are seeing it magnified here in Wisconsin.  While the nation's economy continues to slowly recover, Wisconsin's flounders.