Showing posts with label School Funding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label School Funding. Show all posts

Sunday, December 14, 2014

#192 December 14, 2014- Those Who Can--Teach



Jokes about educators have been around for a long time.  Who hasn't heard the saying, "Those who can do, do, and those who can't teach."  The portrayals of educators on TV and in the movies is almost always a caricature of incompetence and ignorance.  Whether it's Sheldon's disdain for teaching compared to research on Big Bang Theory, or the host of confused and lazy educators on New Girl there are no shortage of modern versions of educators to be mocked.  When educators are given a hero's role in any portrayal it is usually as an overmatched new educator who is driven to fight a system (and often fellow educators) to "save" a group of challenging students.  Students who apparently just needed someone to take a few simple, obvious steps to unlock their vast potential.

Educators aren't alone in this.  Virtually every profession or occupation is satirized and mocked in some way.  If this is true, then why should we be concerned about the misrepresentations, misperceptions and lack of understanding that surround educators and what happens in our classrooms and schools? 


The answer to this question gets at the heart of the ongoing conflicts around public education, public educators and educator unions.  The portrayals of educators and education in popular culture and in the media give a false image of many aspects of education.  In doing so they continue the stereotypes that exist and demean the professional expertise of the educators who work in our schools.  While very few people will even pretend they can match a doctor's level of knowledge or skill, and (while not necessarily appreciating or respecting them) will recognize the expertise that lawyers bring to their work, too many people assume that teaching is a simple and straightforward task. 

This mythology around education is perpetuated in public policy that seeks to deprofessionalize our educational workforce.  The efforts to change the licensing requirements for teachers and to make teaching a job, not a career are based in the notion that educators can be quickly trained and easily replaced.  We also see an effort to make education measurable and to quantify students' learning in ways that reduce learning to a linear progression of skill acquisition.  In doing so, the work of professional educators is seen as less valuable than the efforts of employees who can follow scripted lessons and deliver packaged material.  "Reformers" have taken the need for accountability in education and used it for their own purposes.      

Ill-conceived ratings systems can wreak havoc on educators' careers
america.aljazeera.com


This line of thinking has the same effect on our entire public school system.  Instead of valuing our schools as sources of strength and opportunity, they are turned into businesses that operate for the good of the owners and not the consumers.  Market economics may be a viable concept for the selling of products and some services, but it isn't sustainable or equitable in education.     

This animated feature on school privatization stars little Timmy, a kindergartner who likes his public school. Timmy gets a confusing lesson in corporate edu...
youtube.com

At the same time we see the rhetoric around educator unions mirror this disrespect.  Educators are depicted as lazy, incompetent and in need of representation so that they can continue their slothful ways.  Teacher "tenure" has come under fire and the idea that we need to eliminate bad teachers has become a powerful tool used in undermining confidence in our public schools.                    


For all the debate about tenure, getting rid of teachers is relatively easy; it’s getting them to stay that’s the hard part.
forbes.com|By Nick Morrison


Our public educator unions need to fight back and show the public the reality that surrounds public education.  Unions provide protections and support for educators who are powerful advocates for their students, families and the communities they serve.     


After speaking and guiding a workshop recently, I was struck by some distinct impressions I...
radicalscholarship.wordpress.com

These educators who are under so much fire from the press, politicians and some members of the public are human beings who are working hard under difficult circumstances.  Instead of vilifying them and undermining their efforts, we need to support and nurture our educators.  It starts with an understanding of just what it is that we are doing when we go to work in our classrooms and schools. 

The educators that I work with on a daily basis do so much more than simply present information to students.  We feed, counsel, clothe and care for our students in ways that go far beyond the "Three r's."  We advocate for our students to get medical care, extra support and access to programs and resources.  We are a consistent presence in the lives of students who sometimes have no other consistency.  We support families through illnesses, tragedies and the challenges of daily life.  We become a part of our community and develop strong ties with our fellow citizens.  Any educator you talk to can give you countless examples of just how much education professionals do that goes above and beyond a simple job description. 

We do all this while still trying to meet the obligations placed on us by politicians and policy makers who don't know our students, and who often don't have real school experience.  At times we may speak our minds about policies and legislation that impacts our students in negative ways.  We may also speak out about "reforms" that impact our ability to do our jobs in ways that promote the interests of our students.  We do this because we care about our students, our families, our communities and our profession.  We deserve to be respected and listened to.       

The Good, The Bad and
The Ugly. . .

The Good . . . Democrats are no friends of public education either.  It remains to be seen how the conservative opposition to Common Core and other types of "reforms" will play out.  However, the current dialog around education gives us more opportunities to get the message out about what our schools really need. 

First lady Michelle Obama's program to make school lunches more nutritious takes a hit, too.
washingtonpost.com

The headline isn't necessarily the "Good" here.  Arlene Silveira has been a strong advocate for Madison's public schools and her presence on the Board will be missed.  However, Anna Moffit is an excellent candidate who has earned the support of those who value public education through her advocacy and activism. 

Candidate Anna Moffit is the mother of three children with disabilities in the Madison schools.
host.madison.com|By Molly Beck | Wisconsin State Journal


The Bad . . . A broken system of education funding hurts our public schools.  The current system puts too much emphasis on property taxes and other local revenue sources.  As long as the state and federal government continue failing to fully fund their mandates our schools will struggle to meet their budgetary needs. 

The report from Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch and Revenue Secretary Rick Chandler includes no recommendations.
host.madison.com|By Matthew DeFour | Wisconsin State Journal

It doesn't seem that those in our state government understand what the general public needs when it comes to tax reform.  These tax "reforms" are coming from the party that ran as defenders of the common taxpayer. 

MADISON (WKOW) -- Wisconsin's top business lobbying group wants the legislature to eliminate the state's top income tax bracket as a way to stimulate...
wkow.com|By Greg Neumann

In the meantime, Governor Walker continues to prepare for 2016 and his chance to advance his political career at the expense of Wisconsinites. 

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Gov. Scott Walker is in Las Vegas to meet with billionaire casino mogul and Republican super donor Sheldon Adelson, as Walker...
host.madison.com

The uncertainty around CCSS and other "reforms" can only serve to undermine and confuse the landscape around our public schools.  Many districts have already invested huge amounts of time, money and other resources into implementing CCSS.  Now we face another time of instability and debate that could potentially force districts to spend more of their scarce resources chasing an elusive "tail" of constantly changing expectations and standards. 

Assembly Speaker Robin Vos says new legislation will affirm that if schools like Common Core, they can keep it.
host.madison.com|By Matthew DeFour | Wisconsin State Journal, Molly Beck | Wisconsin State Journal

The Ugly . . . When you consider the statistics around incarceration in Wisconsin, and around the nation, it becomes clear that we have formally institutionalized the inequities that existed as part of our society before the Civil Rights Movement supposedly (especially according to conservative thinking) eliminated racial inequalities in America. 

"Today it is perfectly legal to discriminate against criminals in nearly all the ways that it was once legal to discriminate against African-Americans. Once you’re labeled a felon, the old forms of discrimination— employment discrimination, housing discrimination, denial of the right to vote, denial of educational opportunity, denial of food stamps and other public benefits and exclusion from jury service — are suddenly legal. ...We have not ended racial caste in America; we have merely redesigned it." - Michelle Alexander

Michelle Alexander explains how she came to understand that the racial caste system in America has not ended, it's just been redesigned.
billmoyers.com

Despite the continuing violence and the clear need for us to respond as a society, we continue to promote a culture of guns and fail to address the underlying causes of these senseless acts. 

A Mother Jones investigation analyzes 21 attacks over the past two years.
motherjones.com

Sunday, August 31, 2014

#177 August 31, 2014- Happy Labor Day!!



Different Versions,
Same Reality. . .
Reality and truth are too often portrayed as absolutes based in either common sense or a shared perception of ideas, actions or events.  Yet, we know that different people can experience the same thing and come away with very different perceptions of what occurred.  These differences in "reality" result not only in different interpretations of the "truth" but also create different visions for our future as we move forward from our present circumstances.  It is also true that our own ideologies and biases cause us to define words and concepts differently.  In a nation as diverse as America the inability to agree on a common version of our past, a common interpretation of our current situation and a common vision for the future is often problematic.  This isn't to imply that there are no moral absolutes, or that we are free to act in any way that we choose, but rather a recognition that (within certain parameters) there can be different interpretations of things, and that even if our perceptions are significantly skewed they still influence our reactions and actions.  


Make no mistake about it, diversity of thought and opinion offer significant potential as well.  After all, without divergent thinking we will find ourselves continuing on the same pathways, and ending up with the same results over and over.  The idea that we can be condemned to repeat our past mistakes, or that we should expect different results from the same thoughts and actions cause us to question our ability to improve our future.  We need to have alternative viewpoints and hear the opinions of those who would cause us to question our own version of "reality" if we are to make any progress as individuals or as a society. 

This tension between the safety in consistency in beliefs and the challenge of diversity in thinking creates a number of different emotional states for people.  For some of us, the tension is an opportunity for growth that creates a feeling of hope.  For others, it is a source of fear and anxiety that causes hatred and resentment towards those who challenge or threaten our viewpoints.  Which of these reactions we have is based on many different things and can be different for individuals and groups.  Among the most important factors that influence our reactions to challenge and change are our own stability and sense of security, our ability to accept uncertainty, and the guidance, leadership and support that exist around us.

An example of the effects that multiple "truths" can have is clearly demonstrated in the current climate around public education.  The majority of us would agree that education is important to individuals and to society as a whole.  We can agree that all of our citizens should receive some formalized education and that it should be of the highest quality possible. 

Residence halls are being prepped, school supplies are flying off the shelves, and the sports season has already started. As local K-12 and college students get ready for classes, which
lacrossetribune.com|By Lee Enterprises

Yet, from the very beginning of the discussion we see terms and concepts defined differently, resulting in a wide variety of policies, goals and objectives.  Should our educational system strive to be a "melting pot" and create a uniform vision of citizenship?  Should it be a training ground for future employees and focus on "practical" skills?  Should it be a place where a variety of options are offered and critical thinking is developed and encouraged?  Should education fill multiple roles?  Should we have a public vision of education that is supported by our society?

Here in America we have chosen to answer these questions in a variety of ways, but a majority of our students receive their K-12 educations in public school settings.  While I am of the opinion that this system is the best one for a democratic society, there are challenges associated with trying to define and provide a quality education for millions of students who come from diverse backgrounds and experiences.  This tension has been a source of positive growth, but also has resulted in a system that fails to fulfill its vast promise in many ways. 

Our current dialog about public schools is one that is filled with rhetoric, misleading statements and inconsistencies.  Current Conservative leadership (and unfortunately many leaders from other ideological viewpoints as well) has cast a shadow of doubt over our public education system and distorted the public's view of what is happening to our students and educators in our nation's public schools.  The result is a collection of misperceptions, inconsistencies and outright fallacies that make the already difficult job of educating students that much more challenging.

There is a perception that our public schools cost too much and that too many resources are being funneled into our public education system.  Ask anyone who works in a school and they will tell you that there is a need for more resources and more financial support for our schools.        

Why? To give it to his friends. Walker gave his corporate friends HALF A BILLION DOLLARS in tax...
youtube.com

» Fewer teachers, more poverty mean challenges for kids in Wisconsin’s public schools | Research and...
wisconsinsfuture.org

The dialog around our professional public educators has become extremely negative in recent years.  This, combined with cuts to take home pay, loss of collective bargaining agreements and a general reduction in support for educators has decayed morale in our public schools. 

The West Allis-West Milwaukee School District is trying to rebound from one of...
wisn.com|By Hillary Mintz

Some of the less-experienced teachers hired to replace retiring veterans are...
jsonline.com|By Erin Richards

There is still no deal between the teachers union and the school board in Galesburg, Illinois, as the teachers strike now enters its third week.
wqad.com

The teachers' strike has ended, representatives from the Board of Education and Galesburg Education Association announced early Thursday morning.
galesburg.com

For the second week in a row in his new home, Kenneth Maldonado’s evening...
hechingerreport.org

Imagine if you had to spend hundreds of dollars of your own money just to get...
newyork.cbslocal.com

We are subjecting our students to more and more assessment and more standardization of curriculum as we seek to hold our school systems more "accountable."  This effort to increase accountability and to make our schools more "rigorous" has changed the pedagogical landscape and reduced opportunities for many students to experience the arts, extracurricular activities and even cut into science and social studies instruction.     

Look at the testing chart.
washingtonpost.com

A new study out of USC and the University of Pennsylvania finds that...
latimes.com|By Los Angeles Times

It should come as no surprise that it is our most at-risk students and those from groups that have been historically under-served by our public education systems who suffer the most.  We cut supports, increase academic "rigor" and still expect more from our students, educators and schools.  Students, educators and those who actively support our public schools may recognize the need for these services and supports, but our political leaders and policy makers too often fail to support these needs with resources or their words.       

Poor students don’t just need teachers. They need social workers.
nytimes.com|By Daniel J. Cardinali

Not all students have the same access to advanced courses and electives, which could be a symptom of gaps in achievement.
m.host.madison.com|By Lee Enterprises

The Good, The Bad and
The Ugly. . .

The Good . . . Wisconsinites have a chance to make a strong social, political and economic statement this November.  Our gubernatorial race has implications that go far beyond the borders of Wisconsin.  It is a race that is winnable, but we need to make sure that we get the vote out and keep the focus on issues that matter.    

Stop obsessing over the Senate. Wisconsin is the real battleground.
newrepublic.com

Past polls have showed the governor's race in a dead heat, while the August...
host.madison.com|By Lee Enterprises

WPT will instead have an election special with Democrat Mary Burke on Oct. 16.
wpt.org

Burke agreed this week to a proposed Oct. 16 debate at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point. Walker declined that one.
jsonline.com|By Patrick Marley

The Bad . . . Governor Walker has turned Wisconsin politics into a cesspool of corruption, and he isn't apologetic about it.

Gov. Scott Walker said Saturday he played no role in soliciting donations from a...
jsonline.com|By Daniel Bice

A fresh batch of emails emerged Friday night that shows Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker was deeply involved in raising money for an ostensibly independent group focused on fending off the recall.They came in a court filing from a special...
politico.com|By James Hohmann

The governor dismisses the halted John Doe probe as a "political witch hunt"...
host.madison.com|By Lee Enterprises

The Ugly . . . Our nation is divided in so many ways.  The rhetoric and demagoguery from our Conservative "leaders" does nothing to heal the wounds and unite us as a nation.  

From an NAACP member to an MLK Day-condemner.
newrepublic.com

No other president has had to put up with the kind of opposition that Obama has.
motherjones.com


Sunday, March 16, 2014

#156 March 16, 2014- Educational Identity and Political News



Who Are We. . .
Defining who we are is an important part all of us as humans.  As social creatures we need to establish our identities and work hard to get others to see us in positive ways.  This is true for individuals, and it is also true for larger groups of people as well.  We spend a lot of time and energy working to create perceptions of who we are and what we stand for.  Some of these perceptions are accurate and others are more "PR" that we create, or perceptions, accurate or not, that others create for us.  As Machiavelli stated, “Everyone sees what you appear to be, few experience what you really are.”

For most individuals, how we are perceived by others is a matter of personal interest, but is of little importance outside our immediate circle of friends, colleagues and associates.  However, for those who have greater societal influence, or for groups of people the impacts of public perception are of more significance.  This is why advertising and public relations departments become so important in creating an image of major political, social and economic figures and groups.  There is a need to influence public opinion in order to sell a product, whether that product is an item, an idea or a specific individual.  This is especially true in a society like America's where choice and freedom are held in such high esteem.

There is a constant balancing act that goes on in our public debates here between convincing people and coercing people.  Our idealism tells us that we can use facts and sound arguments to convince others that our viewpoints and ideas are correct.  If our argument is sound, or our product is good then others will buy into our way of thinking, or literally buy what we are selling.  We see efforts to convince others in many places in our society.

Yet, there is another side to public perception and gaining the support of others in our efforts to promote ideas and things that we value.  Coercion is always a part of the human experience.  Once again turning to Machiavelli, “it is much safer to be feared than loved because ...love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; but fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails.”  In other words, since people can't be trusted we need to have some type of mechanism in place to make others do as we want, and fear or punishment is the most effective way to insure cooperation and compliance. 

The more important the "product" is to us, the more likely it is that we will turn to coercion over cooperation.  This is very logical, after all, in matters that are considered important we should do everything possible to make sure that everyone does what is necessary for the survival and prosperity of our society as a whole.  Even in a "free" society like America's we use a number of different mechanisms to insure the compliance of members of our society.  We use physical force and maintain our police and military forces.  We use economic force.  We also use social forces to control the thinking and actions of people in our society.

This may all sound a little heavy handed and bleak.  Yet, it is part of human nature and doesn't have to become Machiavellian in nature.  Human interactions are complex and we rely on a number of different mechanisms to get the things that we want and to promote our ways of thinking.  The language of our founding documents is filled with these conflicts.  On one hand we have the hope and optimism expressed in the power of the people and their efforts to create a just and free society, and on the other hand we see the constant fear of the misuse of power by people. 

In the end, what really matters is our view of humanity and our ability to tolerate our imperfections and our trust in our ability to resolve the problems that we face.  Either we, as a collective whole are able to work together to create a better society, or we must rely on outside forces or strong individuals to control our less positive traits.  The questions of where the power to make decisions lies and who should be responsible for the directions that our society takes are not simple ones, nor are they ones that should be taken lightly.  They also are not as ideologically simple as we would like them to be.   

These are conflicts that have been ongoing throughout human history and that are often masked by other factors.  It is here that our ability to present ourselves in a variety of different ways comes into play.  Honesty isn't something that we have come to expect in our politicians or other prominent public figures.  In recent years we have been conditioned to mistrust those in power, while at the same time we find ourselves turning to new leaders (who frequently end up failing us in the end).  There is a significant amount of irony in hearing candidates tell us that we should trust them and not their opponent, when in reality they are closer in thoughts and actions to each other than they are to the people they are supposed to represent.

It all comes down to the ability of the people to discern what is reality and what is a façade, manufactured to generate support for an ideology or candidate.  However, we live in a complex world, one where fact and fiction often seem interchangeable.  We need an educated, constructively suspicious population that participates in all processes involved in decision making and governing our society.  Education is the key to this, and is vital to the survival of our ideals and our democratic institutions.  No wonder that public education has become a central battleground in the conflict for control of our society. 

Our public education system is a reflection of our society and where we are headed.  How we treat our children and how we choose to educate them reflects on our core values.  It is also a place where we see public perception manipulated and an effort made to control the debate in a variety of ways.  If this premise is true, than what do our stances on public education tell us about the direction our society is moving in?                  

As individuals and as a society, we spend our money on the things that value and express our ideals through our use of financial resources.  In other words, we put our money where our mouth is.  The question becomes, who owns and controls our rights to an education?  Is it the citizens, students and their families, educators, or some other interest?  

If one employee leaves Cuba City High School for a higher-paying position elsewhere in Wisconsin, it can leave the school short of instructors in two or more subjects.
Green Bay Press-Gazette

Like so many people, when I read Mercedes Schneider's posts on Bill Gates and the Common Core I struggled with a jumble of emotions. Surprise. Disgust. Awe. Anger. I'm a visual learner which meant ...
honestpracticum.com

What we choose to spend our financial resources on reflects many things, but we should be making decisions about technology and curriculum purchases based on best practices for our students.

s a pediatric occupational therapist, I'm calling on parents, teachers and governments to ban the use of all handheld devices for children under the...
The Huffington Post|By Cris Rowan

The Waldorf School’s computer-free environment has become a draw for parents at high-tech companies like Google.


How we measure our school systems' successes or struggles also helps define our views on education.  We measure what we value and analyze the results using ideological filters.  We continue to measure educational achievement in ways that are misleading at best and harmful at worst. 

The Senate and Assembly remain at odds over how to reform the state's new school report card.
madison.com|By Lee Enterprises

The federal footprint on standardized testing would shrink under a bill set to be introduced by Reps. Chris Gibson, R-N.Y, and Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., that has major backing from the largest...
blogs.edweek.org

The president of Bard College says recent changes to the SAT are motivated by the competition that College Board has experienced with its arch rival, the ACT, rather than any serious soul searching
TIME



There was a lot of "crazy" for comedian Jon Stewart to review after last weekend's Conservative Political Action Conference, or as he calls it,...
Talking Points Memo


How we treat those who work in our schools also reflects the value that we place on education in general.  

Between San Francisco's hot real estate market and its dwindling teacher pay, not one home or apartment is listed on the market there at a price a...
DailyFinance

A couple of comments from this article. 
"So what ? Who gives a S_ _T about them or any other public sector worker."
"Teachers work 9.5 months a year (180 days to be exact), so yes, it might be difficult to make 12 months of mortgage payments on 9.5 months of salary. The math makes perfect sense to me .I have to work 250 days a year. (5 days x 50 weeks). So, they can either get a career working 12 months a year or get a summer/second job. I appreciate what they are doing for our children, but don't complain about your salary being 75% of the rest of us if you only work 75% as much. I'd love to have your year round health benefit package also."

Whether we see attacks on individual educators, or on the unions that serve and protect educators the message is the same, education is a  "lesser" profession.

At CPAC panel, RNC Chair Priebus touts "total and complete unity" between GOP, Tea Party, and Glenn Beck acolytes
Salon

I didn't think that I would have to update my "Allegations Against Mr. Portelos" list again, but unfortunately I did. Those who have been working tirelessly to end my career hit a new low. A new...
wp.me

At a San Diego school board meeting on Tuesday, dramatic testimony from teachers and parents uncovered serious questions about the way their...
blogs.edweek.org

At one time our public schools were valued and respected, but now. . .

Well, this is not something you hear every day. Ohio state Rep. Andrew Brenner (R-Powell) has raised some eyebrows with a blog post titled "Public...
The Huffington Post|By Rebecca Klein

The problem is that we are allowing our society to be defined by those who would seek to profit as individuals from our collective efforts.  Public education is a bulwark that stands in the way of oligarchy and other non-democratic forms of government.  We need to change the discussion and move forward, building on the strengths of our existing system and utilizing the talents and skills of the professionals who work in our schools.  

The Good, The Bad and
The Ugly. . .

The Good . . . It's still a long way to November, but not too early to hope.

A great piece of news for Mary Burke supporters and a troubling wake-up call for Gov. Scott Walker's campaign.
madison.com|By Lee Enterprises

If we can weather this current storm of Conservatism, maybe the future will look a little brighter.

Get off America's lawn, you punks.
New York Magazine|By Jonathan Chait


The outpouring of love and support from the community was tremendous, and events like this would further honor someone who worked hard to bring different parts of our community together.

Michael Johnson and Ed Hughes are planning a potluck dinner to strengthen community and honor the former Memorial High School principal who...
madison.com|By Lee Enterprises

The Bad . . . It's still long way to November, and the quality and "integrity" of the campaign will probably not rise to a higher level.

The Republican Governors Association was running a TV ad linking Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mary Burke to the state’s economic woes under former Gov. Jim Doyle.
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

We have to stay vigilant and remember that our opposition is willing, and able to do just about anything to maintain political power here in Wisconsin, and around the U.S.

Backed by the billionaire Koch brothers, Americans for Prosperity has campaigned against taxes and spending in Coralville, Iowa, but some voters are skeptical of its motives.
The New York Times|By JOHN ELIGON

In-person absentee voting would no longer be allowed past 7 p.m. or on weekends in Wisconsin under a bill the Republican-controlled state Senate moved closer to passing Tuesday, despite objections from those who say it's...
Green Bay Press-Gazette


The problem with elections in Wisconsin — as it is across the nation — is that not enough people vote.
postcrescent.com

The Ugly . . . No explanation needed.

George Zimmerman was shaking hands, smiling and signing autographs at a central Florida gun show Saturday.
WESH 2 News|By WESH

Sunday, March 9, 2014

#155 March 9, 2014- Ideology and Education



Stand Up For Education . . .
Most of us want to stand for something, to have values and principles that define us and that we consistently apply in our daily lives.  Honesty, courage, persistence, loyalty and a solid work-ethic are all traits that most people would like to be identified with.  We put forth effort in our daily lives to live in a way that represents our values and beliefs.  We look to surround our selves with people who are like minded and who validate our beliefs. 


As we move from the individual to our larger society we put forth a great amount of effort trying to define what makes a society "good" and to create conditions that will perpetuate, honor and defend what we value.  The same desire to stand for something is applied to a larger group and we look to leaders and organizations to help us promote our ideological beliefs.  It is natural for us to view like minded people with respect and to support efforts that move our society in a direction that we feel aligns with our values and principles.

Over time we have seen a number of different philosophies and ideologies develop in an effort to identify and promote ideals that are supposed to help guide us to the best society possible.  People approach this task from a variety of viewpoints; religious, economic, political, psychological, sociological, historical, or a blend of different perspectives.  In the end, no matter the point of view that is taken, the efforts to define what makes a society a positive one rely on simplifying human interactions in order to make sense of what is really a very complex reality.

Here in America we have seen two main ideas put against each other, often in confusing and misleading ways.  They are presented as being diametrically opposed and mutually exclusive.  There is the belief that they can't exist together and that there is an ongoing war between the two philosophies.  This ideological conflict emerges any time there is a disagreement between competing ideas and is applied in ways that are sometimes logical, but other times irrelevant and unnecessarily divisive.  These conflicts can bring out the worst in us at times.  

On one hand we have the idea that we should base our thinking on the ideals of the free market, capitalism and democracy.  According to this line of thinking, America was founded on the shoulders of individuals and we should honor the freedom of the individual no matter what the costs to the collective whole.  If we keep our government and other societal institutions small and relatively powerless, then the most qualified individuals will thrive and society as a whole will be lifted by their efforts.  It isn't difficult to find historical references to this ideal, and we seek to find and glorify these individuals in the present day as well. 

The other viewpoint in this dichotomy is based on the ideas that we must work collectively in order to survive as a thriving, sustainable society.  A society is judged, not by the successes of those already on the top, but by the way that people at all levels of our society live.  While the philosophical expressions of this ideal have often been publicly rejected by mainstream Americans, just look at how Socialism is portrayed in our media and public discourse, we don't have too much trouble identifying examples where the ideals of this viewpoint are espoused.  "An injury to one is an injury to all" isn't too far removed from "We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."

One of the major problems that we face as we try to identify our national ideology is that we put forth philosophies and ideas that are grounded in idealism and not in the real world.  Socialism, Communism, Capitalism and Free Market ideologies are all ideals that have not been fully implemented in the American experience.  This isn't a bad thing, all of these lines of thought are impossible to implement in the complex reality that we live in.  Here in America we have been quick to point out the flaws in Marx's thinking, but need to recognize the fact that Capitalism and Free Market ideas are also based on creating circumstances that don't, and may never, exist in reality.                


All of this would simply make for interesting debate and discussion, or at least interesting debate and discussion for those who enjoy political science, except that the conflicts around our social, political and economic ideologies have real consequences for the citizens of America.  Our utopian views, no matter what side of the argument we fall on, conflict with the reality we live in and leaves us frustrated.  Our beliefs become brittle, rigid and divisive, and instead of being a tool to help us shape our world in a positive way become weapons that weaken all of society.  The mischaracterization of our opponents' viewpoint cause all ideologies to become caricatures and oversimplified versions of what we really aspire to.  We fail to embrace the diversity of thinking that our Constitutional freedoms guarantee and instead fight to silence those who think differently then we do.  The political turmoil in Wisconsin provides a very real example of just how far we have ventured towards political extremism and ideological warfare.

Here in America we have dealt with the reality that none of the political ideologies that have been put forth fully deal with the realities of human experience by creating a blend of public and private enterprises.  From the start of our nation we combined government and private to try and meet the needs of our citizens.  At times we have emphasized the importance of one over the other, but always there has been a mix of public and private services that work, either together or in opposition, to move our nation forward socially and economically. 

People who understand the reality of the needs that our citizens and nation have, recognize the need to have strong public and private sectors.  For our nation to grow and for individuals to enjoy the most success possible, a strong private sector is necessary.  However, our public sector must provide some regulation and control in order to attempt to insure some equity and protections for all citizens.  There are also some services and industries that should be in the hands of the public and not privatized.  In fact, when we are not so ideologically divided, the public and private spheres have often worked well together and provided a balance that has helped make America one of the world's most prosperous nations. 


However, this mixture of public and private sectors along with the confusion around the political theories that support our systems can also be problematic.  This is especially true when political conflicts are heightened.  Our current situation here in Wisconsin, and around America, cause us to rethink the ways that our public and private sectors interact.  This rethinking and restructuring isn't necessarily a negative thing.  In fact, as a society we should always be looking carefully at the way we do things and looking to improve our efforts and outcomes.  The problems arise when we see efforts made to destroy political opponents and to advance one way of thinking over another.  This is especially true when the motives for doing so are questionable in nature. 

The ideological confusion, along with the intense ideological debate (often with questionable motivations) are visible in many areas, but nowhere is it more clear than in the world of education.  In the best of times we have public and private systems that coexist and provide choices for families with a majority of them choosing the public schools.  Those who have strong religious convictions, or who have specific requirements for education can choose other alternatives that are available through private funding and paid for by the families themselves.  However, in times like those we currently live in, the confusions around the purposes of education, the value of education, the methods for delivering instructions and evaluating achievement, and the financing of schools become problematic and divisive. 



The sad truth is that the final confusion, revolving around money, has taken center stage in the battles around education.  We have been conditioned to think of education in financial terms.  Sometimes it is in treating our public spending as the equivalent of a mutual fund, an investment that can be measured in specific, often financial outputs.  A practice that distorts our views of the true values of education to our society and that puts public schools on the defensive.  


Because public schools are funded through public monies, the control of education has shifted from educators and families to politicians.  This means that school funding becomes warped by the inevitable political battles and political spin.  Is the Obama budget's K-12 education focus a movement "toward ending the era of austerity," or is it simply continuing our recent traditions of validating a system that creates "winning and losers"? 




We know how the efforts to control education spending have worked in Wisconsin, and are continually getting more examples of just how harmful the politicizing of school spending is for our students and our schools.   


The emphasis on the fiscal aspects of education means that the actual education of our students ends up being overshadowed and undervalued.  The more we seek to measure our efforts to educate students, the more divisive and less educationally sound our efforts become.  Efforts to improve our schools and provide opportunities for students waver between educationally valid practices and profit making enterprises or political power grabs.      





Make no mistake, we need our public schools now more than ever.  They provide access to educational opportunities for all students, not just the wealthy, academically capable, or well behaved.         
     

Our public schools also provide stability, cohesiveness and a sense of community in our neighborhoods, towns and cities that private schools are inherently unable to offer.  Whether viewed as an investment, or as a resource, our public schools are the vehicle that all members of a community can access, and that drive a healthy, vibrant and sustainable society.  


The Good, The Bad and
The Ugly. . .
The Good . . . All of the efforts to draw attention to the need for corporations like McDonald's to pay their employees a living wage are having an impact.  Of course the company is trying to threaten consumers with the threat of higher prices in order to maintain profit margins.

Fast food giant McDonalds says that growing concerns over income inequality may force it to raise wages.
bbc.com

We can't forget that raising the minimum wage may supposedly "harm" corporate bottom lines, but that it is a positive for people and our economy in general.  Who is our government and our society supposed to benefit anyway? 


Raising minimum wage to $10.10 per hour would cut food stamp spending by $4.6 billion a year, report says.
Washington Post

The Bad . . . When we look at economics and politics on large scales we lose sight of the fact that real people are impacted by the policies that are generated by these ideologies and theoretical constructs.  



The Ugly . . . Racism is alive and has a very public voice.


We need to do something about the problems around financing higher education.  It is vital that we change the way we finance and pay for education in this country.  An education should be a pathway to achievement and stability, not an obstacle to success.  


Just as scary as the idea of student loan debt for a college education is the idea of debt incurred for K-12 educations.

https://www.salliemae.com/student-loans/private-school-loan/