Showing posts with label Labor and Civil Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Labor and Civil Rights. Show all posts

Sunday, December 21, 2014

#193 December 21, 2014- Organizing for Labor



Do as I say, not as I do, is a leadership mantra that is ineffective, disingenuous and laden with hypocrisy.  Yet, this is exactly what we are getting from the Conservative leadership in Wisconsin around issues involving organized labor and the turmoil around the potential introduction of "Right to Work" legislation.  This potential attack on private sector labor unions comes on the heels of Act 10, an anti-union bill that was designed to cripple Wisconsin's public sector unions.  Clearly those who control the Republican Party both locally, and on a national scale, have a significant problem with workers organizing in their workplaces. 

While the real reasons behind their attacks on organized labor are relatively clear and center around gaining and maintaining political power, they mask their anti-union rhetoric in the language of freedom, choice and economic equity.  Essentially, the message is that America's workforce should be made up of individuals who are in a constant state of competition that leads to supposedly improved outcomes.  We constantly hear that unions are outdated, unnecessary, and even anti-American in nature.  In short, workers should be more like businessmen/job-creators who operate independently and are able to compete as individuals in whatever marketplace they are operating in.  Workers shouldn't need to organize if they were more competent, assertive and skilled.

However, if this is the case then why do we see so many efforts by business to organize.  Whether it is through a local Chamber of Commerce, or an organization like Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, we see businesses joining together to advance their interests.  There is strength in numbers for businesses and ownership, just as there is strength in numbers for employees.  While the parallels between unions and business organizations are not perfect, the concept behind them is the same.

Another anti-union argument takes the perspective that management is able to look out for workers better than the "big union bosses."  The message is that unions are somehow exploiting their members in ways that management never would.  If  only workers would "wake up" and see that they are being manipulated in order to pad the pockets of the bosses, then we could avoid the entire problem of unions. 

Of course, there are many examples of just how false this argument is.  One of the most glaring is the manipulation of voters who are part of the Tea Party movement.  If unions are the product of a mislead and misguided workforce, then what exactly does that mean for the voters who cast ballots for Tea Party candidates?  The idea that union bosses are corrupt, but big business isn't is one that rings hollow upon any reflection.     

A new academic study confirms that front groups with longstanding ties to the tobacco industry and the billionaire Koch brothers planned the formation of the...
huffingtonpost.com

http://portside.org/2014-12-19/how-alec-helped-undermine-public-unions

We can leave the world of politics and see just how the American worker has fared economically and socially as unions have lost their influence and employees have been left without significant protections.  Workers are more productive, and although they earn 23% more than they did in 1973, they work 26% more hours.  In other words, for more production, with more time on the job, workers are barely keeping up with the costs of living. 

As workers are devalued, many need multiple jobs to make a middle-class wage
washingtonpost.com

More than 60 million people in U.S. households depend on the earnings of a low-wage worker, according to a new report released on Tuesday.
thehill.com|By Vicki Needham

The attacks on the middle class, working class and the working poor isn't just about destroying unions.  It's also about attacking benefits and safety nets in an effort to profit from the shrinking of our public services.  Welfare recipients make an easy target for politicians, but Social Security, tax breaks and other things that benefit middle class families are also facing cuts or even elimination. 
  
Once it became clear that Wisconsin Republican Glenn Grothman would win a U.S. House seat in the November 2014 elections, his penchant for making...
politifact.com

The climate may not be favorable for organized labor, but the need for unions is just as great now as it ever was.  We are seeing the disparity in incomes increase and more and more people falling out of the middle class.  Poverty is rising, and we are seeing the futures' of our children negatively impacted by the policies of the anti-labor, anti-government, pro-big business movement that the Tea Party and other Conservative movements represent.  The time is now for the labor movement to regain its status in American politics and in our society as a whole.  We can't shrink from the conflicts and assume that our elected officials will adequately represent our interests.  Our nation is built on rules that allow for us to organize, associate with organizations and use the system to protect our interests. 

In writing the majority court decision in the Integrity Staffing Solutions Inc. vs. Busk decision, Justice Thomas may have just killed Right-To-Work and anti-Union laws.
addictinginfo.org

It is important to look for connections beyond those traditionally accessed by labor.  There are many places where the interests of workers, management and ownership can intersect. 

More than 300 construction-related businesses are part of the coalition.
greenbaypressgazette.com

At the same time organized labor can't simply continue with the tried and true tactics of the past.  Here in Wisconsin we've seen the impact that money can have on all aspects of our political, economic and legal systems.  There needs to be a concerted effort made by unions to expand their influence beyond the limited scope of the workplace or industry they represent.  Organizing in 21st Century America means building a broad base around issues that can unite large numbers of people.  Social justice issues like the minimum wage can provide these opportunities, and unions need to step up and regain their status as representatives of all workers, not just a select few. 

The new labor movement is beginning to advance workers’ interests through legislation, writes guest columnist
seattletimes.com

In doing so, unions can work to shed the baggage of the past and embrace a future that includes diversity in membership, and diversity in issues that are addressed by unions.  We know that unions have a history that is both positive and negative when it comes to issues of equity.  However, no matter what the past may have been the potential of collective action outweighs the historical shortcomings.  We have huge problems around equity and race in America.  Unions can work to create workplace rules and climates that can serve to level the playing field. 


Analysis: The racial wealth divide is a persistent fact of American life and getting worse
america.aljazeera.com

We also need to recognize that a united group of people, working together to achieve common goals can have a powerful impact on small and large scale issues.  In fact, collective action is the cornerstone of our nation and is vital to the continued success of our society.  We know that the wealthiest and most powerful are organizing and acting, it seems obvious that the rest of us should be doing what they do, not what they say. 

The Good, The Bad and
The Ugly. . .
The Good . . . Sticking with Cold War policies that have proven harmful to the entire region makes very little sense.  It is time that we rethink how we interact with our neighbors. 

It would take real leadership to change course and adopt a more sensible policy towards Cuba. President Obama offered that leadership today.
msnbc.com

The Bad . . . The fact that Walker is considered a viable candidate to be President of the United States points to the polarization of our nation.

Iowa political insiders say participation in the state's straw poll and caucuses could push Gov. Scott Walker into the top tier of presidential candidates.
host.madison.com|By Jessie Opoien | The Capital Times

The Ugly . . .  Considering that 4 of the members of the Wisconsin Supreme Court have benefited from political spending by Wisconsin Club for Growth (one of the defendants), this decision appears to be fairly predictable.  Our justice system in Wisconsin is severely lacking in credibility at its highest level.    

The cases stem from a long-running secret investigation into fundraising and spending by the Republican governor’s campaign and conservative groups backing him.
jsonline.com|By Patrick Marley

Sunday, January 26, 2014

#149 January 26, 2014- Public Ed., Technology and Social Justice



Vouching for Public Schools. . .
We are constantly being showered with rhetoric that tells us our public schools are failing, that a significant number of our educators are either incompetent, unmotivated or both, and that we need to make drastic changes in the system in order to increase the equity in educational opportunities for all students.  Yet, the attacks are grounded in some false assumptions, half-truths and a legacy of efforts designed to undermine our public education systems across the nation.

Neither political party and very few interest groups have really stepped up to defend our public schools, despite the fact that these schools are the only place where services for students of all needs and demographics are mandated.  Instead, we have seen a call for re-segregating our schools and recreating a separate and unequal system that is not only unfair, but also unconstitutional.  Our public schools have been consistently maligned, underfunded and overregulated by those who claim to be acting "for the children." 


Yet, when funded and supported we have seen achievement gaps closed by our schools, and it is only in the last 25 years, as cuts to funding and new mandates were implemented, that we have seen this progress halted.  Here in Wisconsin we've seen cuts to education that are unprecedented in scale, and the efforts to demean the efforts of public educators intensified.  Data about our schools are twisted, and "reform" rhetoric has become the norm in discourse about public education.       
   



We are seeing pushback from supporters of public education.  A great example comes from those fighting against the efforts to promote legislation creating a special needs voucher (re-titled scholarship) program.




Tech, Trust,  Obstruction
and Advocacy . . .
Technology can be a valuable tool in our daily lives, and plays an important role in the education of our students as well.  The Madison school district recently unveiled an ambitious plan to improve access to technology for students in the district.    



Response to the plan was mixed, and there were strong opinions raised on all sides of the issue.  This topic has become a source of some controversy and intense feelings with a few unnecessary snide comments thrown in.    
Please take some time to look at the plan. If you have thoughts, questions, recommendations or even a reaction to share, we’d love to hear from you. Fire up the digital device of your choice, and send us an email at board@madison.k12.wi.us. If you think we’re making a mistake by proposing to race headlong into this technology thing, let us know that as well. But you might want to deliver that message via the Postal Service.


host.madison.com

While you should take time to read the plan itself, and formulate your own opinions, I want to take the time to expand on the position of those "opposed" to the plan. 

First, to identify us as opposed to the technology plan is inaccurate.  We support a plan to get technology in to our schools and in to the hands of our students.  Technology is a huge expense and these are tough financial times for schools.  To add technology, or any other initiative without careful planning and open, honest dialog would be a huge mistake and one that would likely cause more harm than benefit for our students.  The opposition arises not from an anti-technology viewpoint, but from an effort to insure wise implementation, to address existing needs, and to protect things that are of value from funding cuts. 

I would hope that in a district committed to education of all students, that opinions from the community would be a valued part of the discussion.  To imply that those who question the plan are out of touch with the modern world, as Board President Hughes does in his article on the MMSD website, does little to build support for the plan, or to foster open communication around this, or any, issue.

That leads directly to the issue of the speed with which supporters  are moving forward with the plan.  While they are making the argument that the tech plan has been a topic of discussion for months, many in the district have only become aware of the details in the past week or so.  Educators and students in the district have suffered from the quick implementation of district wide initiatives that have had mixed results in recent years.  The adoption of a district wide reading program for elementary students in the recent past is an example of this type of action.  One of our strengths as a district is the well educated and highly involved community that our schools are embedded in.  Through discussion and public input we will see new ideas come forth, and a stronger plan developed.

This isn't to say that we need to study, discuss and reformulate technology plans over the course of years, but rather that opening the discussion to a wider audience, including educators at a variety of buildings, will give us better results in the long run.  In the week or so since the plan was introduced we have seen input given, and modifications made in the plan.  Clearly there is an opportunity here to develop a positive and sustainable vehicle to get technology in to MMSD schools.  We appreciate the willingness of administration to listen to concerns, and hope that more opportunities will be given before a final plan is passed.               

The question that Tech Plan supporters have is, why would anyone resist improving the technology available to MMSD students?  After all, technology isn't going away and our district has not consistently kept up with the latest innovations and advances available.  Once again I remind you that those voicing concerns about the plan are not opposed to technology, nor are we simply obstructionists who want to criticize any new initiative.  In order to support a Tech Plan, or any initiative, I feel that a few basic issues must be addressed.

1- It must not take away from existing or new programs that build human supports for our students, families and community.  Education is a labor intensive endeavor and we need as many people as possible actively involved in the process.  Things like Ready, Set, Goal conferences, school staff in the most at-risk communities and enough staff to insure the diverse needs of all learners are met need to take precedence over any technology or materials that are purchased. 
While we are being assured that the Tech Plan won't restrict spending on these needs, it is difficult to believe that we will not see technology pitted against human resources at some time in the not so distant future. 

2- It must build on the strengths that exist in our schools, and fill a genuine need in a meaningful way.  There are many innovative ways that MMSD staff is using technology right now, and we should build off of these programs.  If we simply put devices in our schools we will not get the maximum benefit from our investment.  Putting decision making about technology at the school level can insure that we tailor purchases to the needs of a building and that funds are used in the best manner possible. 

3- It must be sustainable and supportable.  Too often we see our current technology failing us for a variety of reasons, and the idea that adding more will somehow improve things seems illogical.  There will be significant costs involved in educating educators to use technology most effectively, and to maintain the devices in buildings.  The best plans are often simple and develop over time, once again building on the strengths in each school around the district.

Unfortunately, there is also a history here of initiatives being rolled out to great fanfare, and then abandoned just as quickly.  It is unfair, and short sighted to oppose initiatives solely for this reason, but also very human to feel apprehension when a huge plan like this is unveiled.  Those anxieties are increased when a plan is accelerated through the system, and when those in favor of it speak in stark terms of "your either with us, or against us."  I hope that we can continue the dialog and emerge with a plan that will feature the best possible solutions to some very challenging problems.      

I invite everyone to come to the regular Board of Education meeting on Monday, January 27th @ 6PM in the McDaniels Auditorium at the Doyle Building to hear more about the plan.  Several SCAPE members will be offering their ideas, and we hope to hear from others in the community as well.  

State of My State. . .
"I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is […] the white moderate, who is more devoted to 'order' than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice."  These words come from Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" and ring true through the years.  I would argue that we are facing conditions that are returning us to an America where access to opportunity and justice are becoming more restricted, and that we are seeing issues of injustice becoming more widespread with every passing day.  While visibly true for citizens of different races, all of us are feeling the effects of policies designed to divide and conquer us.  Whatever your demographic identity, it is becoming clear that we are facing a concerted effort to return American society to a time in history where phrases like, "All men" meant some men, and "The general welfare" referred to a select few.      

The idea that Dr. King espouses about "the white moderate" can be expanded to include anyone of any demographic who is satisfied with the current status quo that exists in our state and our nation.  We are hearing a lot about "freedom", "opportunity" and "equality", but the words are ringing hollow when we see the reality that so many of our fellow citizens are experiencing.  Too many of us are simply willing to sit on the sidelines and allow those who are in power manipulate our system and speak for us. 

We need to increase the tension in our society in a positive way.  This means speaking up for what we believe in and not accepting the word of social, political and economic leaders as truth simply because it was uttered by someone with credentials.  We need to make sure that we stay informed and involved and use whatever methods available to make our voices heard in the debates that currently occupy our attention.  We also need to make sure that we are aware of future struggles looming on the horizon. 

Dr. King was a champion for Civil Rights, which included rights for all people.  He was a voice for labor, a voice against violence and a voice for equality for all.  His message and legacy, which we honored on Monday, is one that we need to make sure is heard throughout the year, and applied to all situations.  It is interesting to see how Dr. King's memory is juxtaposed with the message that was delivered by Scott Walker on Wednesday.  Walker used some of the same words like "opportunity" and spoke of putting "power back in to the hands of the people."  However, the truth behind these words is not the truth that Dr. King spoke about. 



It is up to us to reject order unless it leads to justice, and to create the tension that is necessary to lead our state down the path towards opportunity and justice for all.  We must refuse to allow empty words and promises to replace the collective actions that promote widespread equality and positive relationships between citizens of many different demographics.  We can't forget that all the talk of budget surpluses and tax refunds are part of an agenda that focuses on building economic success for a few on the backs of the many.  As George Washington said, "Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains taken to bring it to light." 
 





The Good, The Bad
and The Ugly. . .
The Good . . .  A victory for labor!!



The Bad . . .  Another federal court case that could change things drastically for unions around America.  Meanwhile, Wisconsin unions await our Supreme Court's ruling on MTI's case against Act 10.  


The Ugly . . .  We know that there are inequities in the distribution of wealth, but this is startling.



Meanwhile, most of us are working harder, and losing ground.  

Sunday, September 1, 2013

#128- Labor Day Issue, Singing and Politics



Keep Labor in Labor Day!!!…
For many Americans the reason we celebrate Labor Day has been forgotten.  For many it has become the unofficial end of summer, just a three day weekend before the school year really gets underway.  Even more troubling are the commentaries that will speak about the historical achievements of labor while at the same time implying that the need for workers to organize is just that, historical. 


There is no doubt that organized labor in America has a rich history that should be celebrated.  The economic power of America has been built on the backs of the working and middle class, and the working and middle class owe a large measure of their successes to organized labor.  We can use Labor Day to celebrate these achievements.       


However, to view Labor Day as a day only of revisiting the history of the movement is to ignore the real need for continuing efforts to defend the rights of workers.  Organized labor is not the dinosaur from the past that those who attack worker's rights in modern America would have us believe it is.  In fact, in the current climate, the need for workers to organize is every bit as important as it ever has been. 

We are seeing a concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a small number of people that threatens the very fabric of our society.  This isn't something new in our history.  The very wealthy have always sought to dominate our society and to cement their status through a variety of political, social and economic efforts.  In the face of these efforts, organized labor has often been the sole voice that has protected the majority of citizens and served as a balancing force against the power of the few. 


The current climate for workers is troubling.  Low pay, cuts in hours, reduced or non-existent benefits and an increasingly hostile political climate are putting significant pressure on employees in all fields.  The past decades have seen a gradual erosion in the power that unions are able to exert and an, all too frequent belief, that the need for unions is gone.  After all, we have laws to protect workers and other policies that insure workplaces are safe and fair treatment for employees is guaranteed, right?

The reality for many workers is that they are facing significant workplace challenges and that the working conditions for workers have degenerated.  Places like Wal-Mart that used to be more worker friendly are now anything but that.  Workers are told that they should feel lucky to just have a job, and that any dissent or effort to improve their conditions will not be tolerated.  Once again, this isn't anything new to our nation.  In challenging economic times we have always seen the wealthy use this strategy of controlling the labor force by pitting workers against each other and using the "market" to drive down wages, benefits and working conditions.  Individual workers struggle to be heard, but organized workers have a voice that is more powerful.    



We certainly can't rely on politicians to protect the workers of our society.  In Wisconsin this fact has been made crystal clear over the past couple of years.  The idea that public policy is designed to promote and protect the rights of workers is so far removed from the reality as to be laughable.  The "focus" on jobs is simply political rhetoric designed to garner the support of voters, but has no real substance to it.    

www.wjfw.com

The attacks on worker's rights extend to all types of employment.  The attacks on public employee rights to organize, are the latest in the efforts to dismantle organized labor in America.  A significant amount of energy has been put into creating the illusion that public employees, like educators, don't need organized labor to protect their interests.  Even individuals speaking publically in support of  public educators question their need to be involved in labor issues.
  
"Teachers have not always helped themselves, due in large part to occasional periods of what look like out of touch labor militancy."

Educator unions and the actions of their members are not "out of touch labor militancy".  The collective bargaining agreements that have been negotiated over the years allow educators to focus on doing their jobs and advocating for the students they serve.  They are an effort by employees to exercise some measure of control over their working conditions and benefits.  Anyone who denies this needs only to look to school districts across the state and nation where union protections have either been weakened or eliminated.   



www.cpr.org

There is a clear effort to de-professionalize education and to turn the field into a stepping stone to a "real" career.  The combination of eliminating incentives and protections provided by negotiated contracts with the wave of educational "reforms" creates an attitude of disrespect for professional educators.  Despite significant evidence that educational outcomes for students are improved by educator stability the rhetoric of reform puts more faith in programs than in educators.    




The budget crisis that was manufactured to create the "need" to attack public employee bargaining rights also has allowed for Wisconsin Republicans to enact state budgets that will perpetuate the perception that public employees are to blame for the economic woes in Wisconsin.  By cutting state funding to school districts, these districts are forced to increase property taxes.  This literal passing the buck, increases public sentiment against educators and school districts.  



The politics of "divide and conquer" are obviously being used here in Wisconsin.  It is being employed to pit different groups against each other.  Those who employ these strategies hope that the citizens of Wisconsin forget that we all have an interest in the success of every laborer.  A strong, healthy society is built on the belief that every citizen is valued and every job is important.  They hope to continue to deceive the citizenry that they are acting on behalf of the majority.  On Labor Day we need to remember and celebrate our history, but also look to the future.  A future that must include a place for organized labor at the table. 

How unions help all workers | Economic Policy Institute

www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp143/‎

How unions help all workers | Economic Policy Institute

www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp143/‎


Solidarity Sing…
Bizarre and disturbing are two adjectives that somewhat adequately describe the past week at the Wisconsin State Capitol. 
It was a week where we were reminded that just a year ago the Wisconsin Senate unanimously honored the Solidarity Sing Along.

It was a week where the fear that we would see violence in our capitol was realized.  That this violence came from law enforcement is extremely troubling to say the least. 



We are seeing continuing issues around the applications for permits.  Sometimes supposedly on the "behalf" of the Solidarity Sing.  Some wonder if this isn't an attempt by the administration to defuse the situation without conceding defeat.  


It was also a week of  hope and solidarity.  We are reminded of the violations of our rights and the need to continue the struggle.


www.isthmus.com

www.cityofmadison.com


How will this struggle be resolved?  What will the eventual outcome be?  The answers are not clear and the end of the conflict is not yet visible.  However, it is clear that the Solidarity Sing will continue to be a voice in Wisconsin despite the efforts of the administration to suppress it. 
Wisconsin Politics…
Anyone who thought that the political battles in Wisconsin were behind us is sorely mistaken.  If anything the conflicts here will only escalate in the immediate future.  The stakes are extremely high for all of us who are interested in returning Wisconsin to a progressive and socially just path. 

If anyone needed evidence that we need to continue to work to change the course that our current leadership is taking us in.  A few examples of corruption, questionable ethics and dubious motives. . .

dnr.wi.gov





Governor Walker is clearly in campaign mode (as if he hasn't been campaigning since Day 1 of his tenure in office).  Whether for another term as governor, or aiming for a higher office is a reasonable question.

www.wkow.com

Absolutely love the quote from this article, “'Campaign' refers to Walker’s 2014 re-election bid, although it is unclear how many Wisconsin voters will be in Seattle next week.”

blogs.seattletimes.com


 80% insurance rate hike under ACA will take four years - Milwaukee -...

Along the way we will need to work to combat the intentional ignorance that so many in our society seem to enjoy, and that is perpetuated by major media outlets.  



We must to begin mobilizing and preparing to defeat Walker in 2014.  This begins with finding a candidate that will truly represent us and can generate statewide support.