Sunday, December 8, 2013

#142 December 8, 2013- A Call to Action, "Good" vs. "Bad"



Thanks Marj. . .
The educational community in Madison experienced a significant loss this week when Marj Passman, long time public educator and advocate for our schools, announced that she wouldn't be seeking another term on the MMSD School Board.  While certainly not unexpected given her recent health concerns and the decades of devoted advocacy, there is no doubt but that her leaving the board will leave a void that will need to be filled.  She was a tireless advocate for public schools, students and educators.  She brought her experience from the classroom and her passion for teaching into the political and policy making fray, often giving voice to these groups that are too often ignored in our decision making processes.


It would be easy for me to continue on and give more examples of how important Marj has been to Madison's educational community and to my own family's experiences in public education.  When my wife was hired by MMSD she was privileged to work with a true "Dream Team" that included Marj, as well as several other educators who have gone on to fight for students, educators and public education at multiple levels.  As the years have gone by, Marj has always listened to what we've had to say, and then acted to incorporate our views while still maintaining her integrity.  She has endured criticism for her advocacy, but has never failed to keep the true purpose of public education at the forefront of her ideas and decisions. 


Yet, while she will be missed and should be thanked for her efforts, the reality is that the fight must continue.  I'm reminded of a quote about Dr. King that fits this situation as well.  Charles Willie, a classmate of King's at Morehouse, wrote, "By idolizing those whom we honor, we fail to realize that we could go and do likewise."  It isn't enough to thank Marj, the best thanks that we can give her is to step up and continue to advocate for our students, educators and our public schools.  That's exactly the role that educators fill, we supply the knowledge and the motivation to our students with the expectation that they will use what they've been given to make positive change happen in the world we live in.  Marj has provided us with a powerful role model and an example of how we can fight for what we value.  She has earned her opportunity to enjoy time with her family and a chance to relax, now it is up to us to follow her example. 

What's Best for Kids. . .
We spend a lot of time working to define what is "good" and "bad" in education.  The problem is that terms like "good" and "bad" really don't allow for much discussion to occur.  These words imply some sort of overarching truth that can be applied to our schools.  They ignore that fact that our schools are working to educate students who are diverse in many ways and who have different needs that must be addressed.  By dividing policies, practices and outcomes into mutually exclusive, quantifiable, and definable categories we create an atmosphere that stifles creativity, reduces learning and makes education a divisive battlefield instead of a source of unity and power.    



This isn't to say that there aren't things that are better for students, or that produce better outcomes for those attending our schools.  It also doesn't mean that we don't have goals that we want our students to achieve.  The problem is that when we categorize our efforts and seek to quantify the achievements of our students and schools, we limit the vision of what we can accomplish and force everyone involved in the effort into a narrow set of parameters that can only have a positive or negative impact.  We eliminate the grey areas in an endeavor that exists in a very grey reality.   


This emphasis on defining and measuring success has created a sense of crisis around education.  We search for ways to identify things that work for students, but we use faulty measures.  By doing so, we make the measuring tools the focus of our efforts, and fail to promote real learning.  We also implement programs and policies that, not surprisingly, end up being harmful to our students, educators and schools.    
    




Our nation's education crisis is really just a cover for the real issues which are the inequities in a system that favors those with wealth, and those of specific demographic categories.  The ways that we've engaged in debate around educational policy in America attempt to ignore these realities.  They place the blame for any failures of students to succeed on the educational system and educators, while ignoring the conditions that have a significant impact on student achievement.      


These factors have a major effect not only on students, but also on educators.  




What can be done in the face of such powerful forces that seek to control, manipulate and exploit our students and schools?  It takes the "whole village" to resist these privatization efforts and to put control of our schools in the hands of those who would use them to promote learning over profit.  



The goals of this day of action spell out a framework that can provide guidance in achieving our goals for public education. 
1) Revise how we fund public education.
2) Class size matters!  
3) Full professional staffing for all schools.  
4) A fully inclusive range of creative subjects.
5) The full funding for and inclusion of athletics, after-school programs, lunch, and recess.  
6) Course content and teaching methods emphasizing a diverse range of perspectives, needs, and voices that embody the diverse fabric of our society.  
7) Demand that curriculum be selected based on the needs of the community.  
8) Elimination of all high stakes standardized testing.  
9) Include meaningful systems for assessment and evaluation such as portfolios and project-based learning.  
10) Elimination of corporate interests in “funding” their right to promote their agenda for public education.  
11) Demand that your schools board be comprised of elected officials.  
12) Be informed about the “choice” policies coming to your district!  

Race in America. . .
We still have huge problems in America around issues involving race.  One of the most significant of these problems is the belief that is widely expressed that we don't have problems with race in America.  For many Americans racism ended when the visible barriers of segregation and Jim Crow were broken down by the Civil Rights Movement.  Now, it isn't uncommon to hear the problems of different racial groups blamed on the members of the groups or on other issues that are non-race related.
Yet, it is difficult to ignore the fact that while there are many issues that do impact an individual's experience in American society, race is one of the primary factors in determining how any individual experiences life in America.  It is a statistical reality that we must continue to work to address because it involves real people living life in a nation that is supposed to turn a blind eye to anything except an individual's abilities and merits.  The "content of our character" is supposed to mean more than the "color of our skin", but too often, for too many, that isn't the reality they live and work in.    
  


We must realize that, while it is possible to legislate some aspects of race relations, the majority of the work must be done on an individual, person to person, basis.  Here's a very powerful example of an effort that goes a long way towards combating racism where it is most effective. The following quotes sum up the best way to resolve any problem, and that also demonstrates the problems we face in America today.  Problems that stem from an unwillingness to discuss, and unwillingness to listen, and an unwillingness to admit that there's even a problem.    
"A lot of people have anti-racist groups. They get together and meet and have a diverse group and all they do and sit around and talk about how bad discrimination is. Then someone says ‘there’s a Klan group across town. Why don’t we invite them to come and talk to us?’ and the other person says ‘Oh no! We don’t want that guy here!’ Well, you’re doing the exact same thing they are. What’s the purpose of meeting with each other when we already agree? Find someone who disagrees and invite them to your table."
"Invite your enemy to talk. Give them a platform to talk because then they will reciprocate. Invite your enemies to sit down and join you. You never know; some small thing you say might give them food for thought, and you will learn from them. Establish dialogue. It’s when the talking stops that the ground becomes fertile for fighting."


Wisconsin Politics: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. . .
The Good- It looks like we may have a primary to see who will represent the Democrats against Scott Walker.  The people of Wisconsin deserve to have a say in this important decision.   

“Every day I seem to be getting closer and closer to making the decision to run for governor because of the positive support I’ve found,” Vinehout told the Leader-Telegram.

Whatever the results of a primary election might be, the race would hopefully force the candidates involved to clearly articulate their positions on issues.  Without a challenge from another Democrat, Mary Burke can continue to simply be "Not Walker" in the race.  Her answers to questions and positions on the issues are too undefined and vague to generate significant support from those who could be persuaded to vote against Walker in 2014.

Statements like this one about the voucher program in Wisconsin leave me confused as to what exactly her position is, and what she would do to protect our public schools.   
"Well, I would look first and foremost in Milwaukee and Racine, where it already is, and you have 25,000 students in there. I think we have to look to quality of education above all else and I would work first toward that and the accountability. I don’t foresee any time in the near future that the Legislature will be able to work at anything else, and so that’s what I would certainly focus on, is making sure that the accountability is there now, and that would be a top priority."

Something we should be proud of, and something we need to continue to defend.


The Bad- Even though this loyalty oath never made it into official policy, the fact that it was suggested shows just how far ALEC would like to go towards completely controlling some of our elected officials.  


Our elected leaders continue to ignore what needs to be done and focus on gaining and maintaining power instead of promoting policies that will improve Wisconsin's economic outlook.  



Education is supposed to be a pathway to success, but for many it is also a pathway to debt and financial struggles.  



The Ugly- While Walker has tried to distance himself from this supposed "mistake", the inaccuracies and false claims continue to pour out as he prepares for future campaigns. 




Worker's Rights, Spend Your Money Wisely. . .
As we continue through the holiday shopping season it is too easy to forget the struggles for labor rights that are ongoing in our nation.  The gaps between the wealthy and the rest of America are continuing to expand, and the shopping/spending patterns that so many of us follow simply compound the problems.  


Support the efforts of employees who are fighting for better pay and better working conditions. 





Shop around and look for products made in America by union workers.  Also be sure to frequent shops that are based locally, that sell worker friendly products, and that support labor through their own policies.  

Sunday, December 1, 2013

#141 December 1, 2013- Failed Potential and Critical Thinking



What's Best for Kids. . .
America is a nation with virtually unlimited potential.  As a society we are able to accomplish great things and have a history of tremendous achievements in almost every aspect of human activity.  Yet, despite this potential and history of achievement, there are still some areas where widespread success has proved incredibly elusive.  One of the most significant of these is our inability to address issues of equality and opportunity for all citizens.  This failure has been a consistent feature of our society from the very beginning, but is has been magnified in recent years beginning with the "War on Poverty" and continuing to the huge disparity in wealth in current American society. 

These gaps in opportunity and achievement are clearly on display in our educational system.  We have a system that is one of the best in the world for some students, and one that struggles to match these successes for many others.  Our Achievement Gaps in schools, mirror the gaps that exist in our society in terms of income and access to power. 


For all of its flaws, one positive that No Child Left Behind accomplished was to shine a light on these gaps in our schools.  While it didn't come as a surprise to those of us in school buildings, the struggles that many of our students experience shocked a significant number of Americans into believing that our schools were in crisis and needed to be "reformed".  Politicians and educational "entrepreneurs" saw this as an opportunity to make a statement, or a profit, and jumped into the debate over how to make our schools better for all students.  The phrase, "What's best for kids," became a common refrain heard in almost every debate around education.

Moving forward from the 1980's we've seen a wave of "reform" efforts buffeting our public school systems.  The efforts to improve our public schools have dominated public policy debate and have been major parts of political campaigns.  We've seen a wide variety of ideas put forward from voucher programs, to new standards, to new curricula.  Efforts have been made to empower families, empower students, dis-empower educator unions, the list of "reforms" is many.

Yet, when you look at the data and look at the outcomes for students, none of it seems to be working.  Why is it that in a nation with so many resources and so many brilliant minds we just can't seem to create a system, method or program that will educate all of our students?  We jump from reform to reform always in search of the next "magic bullet" that will solve our problems and eliminate the gaps in achievement.  Taxpayers bemoan the huge investment in education that seems to be a "waste" of their money.  Politicians criticize their opponents and look for scapegoats, too often the educators in schools, to gain political power.  The pressure on public schools to meet the needs of all students is incredible.

In the end, I believe that there is one simple reason why our efforts to "reform" our schools and to meet the needs of all of our students don't succeed.  Despite claims to the contrary, education in America has always been more about power and control than about teaching students.  Just look at our nation's educational history.  We've always used education as a tool to promote a specific way of thinking, or as a political tool.  Whether it was used to indoctrinate immigrant children, "Americanize" Native Americans and eliminate language and cultures that were "foreign" to the "majority", or to funnel money to (or away from) different interests, education has been more about power than about learning. 

If we really want to change the conversation around education, if we really want all students to succeed, then we need to realize that education can't be about gaining power and control of those being educated, but must be about empowering our students and our educators.  Unfortunately, most of the, so called, reforms that are being offered are tied directly to some political agenda, or some for profit scheme that ignores the reality that most of our students and educators work and learn in.  

Just look at some of the recent discussions about "fixing" our public education system and you can see just how far from students, educators and learning the conversations are.  Instead of focusing our attention on what our students really need, the debate focuses on policies that do little to impact our most at-risk students directly.  Instead of really trying to address the needs that exist in our schools, too many of the decisions create conditions that actually hamper student learning.  Supporters of public education are reduced to fighting to make sure that voucher and charter schools are held to the same irrelevant and irrational standards as the public schools, or simply trying to defend our public schools from being destroyed by vindictive policies that seek to undermine the political and economic power of professional educators.  Even ideas that sound like they would be positive have been corrupted by outside interests and questionable motives.    
     






What we should be fighting for is a totally different approach to fixing education.  Instead of dissecting good literature, looking for specific criteria and reading historical documents in a sterile context that ignores the stories behind the sources, educators should be teaching all subjects in an integrated and engaging manner.  Instead of cutting back on programs that engage students and expand their skills, we need to put more emphasis on the arts, music, physical education and other "non-core" subjects.  Evidence supports the idea of teaching subjects in this manner, not by teaching skills in isolation.  Yet, we see many of the "reforms" being pushed take us in a more traditional and skill based bearing.  
 

The struggles to define the future of public education in America are vital to our success as a nation.  It is up to us to move the debate in a new direction.  


Compare and Contrast. . .
Most of us remember the essay questions on exams where we were to compare and contrast two books, characters, events, or any number of other things that had been covered in the class we were enrolled in.  While a very common type of question in many classes, they can be a very good critical thinking exercise.  Essentially, to compare and contrast means that we take two different things and look for the similarities and differences between them.  This can be done in any content area and forces students to think carefully about the topics they are analyzing. 

We do this to students all the time in our classrooms, but something happens to many of us when we leave the academic environment.  Too many of us seem to lose our critical thinking skills and instead become entrenched in a dogmatic way of thinking about the world around us.  We accept or reject ideas or opinions based, not on critical thinking, but instead on our entrenched ideas that may or not be supported by information.  As adults we lose our accountability in decision making and become static in our ideas, opinions and problem solving strategies.  We recycle the same "facts" and refuse to consider alternatives to the reality that we exist in.

This lack of critical thinking becomes all too apparent as we continue to engage in bitter debate and conflict on a wide range of issues here in Wisconsin and around the United States.  Sides are drawn, political positions are fortified and groups and individuals on all sides are unwilling to allow for compromise, or even real discussion to occur.

When we do this we ignore the "compare" part of our critical thinking exercise.  To compare different ideas means that we look for similarities between the opposing items.  This can result in some positive building blocks to work with.  After all, we are all citizens of a specific municipality, state and/or nation.  We should have some common interests that could serve to unite us, if we could look beyond the differences that we see too clearly.  We don't have to agree 100% with others, but there should be some common ground to work from.  As human beings who share communities with other humans we need to find these areas of common ground (safety, survival needs, etc.) and build from them. 

"Comparing" can also expose some troubling realities.  When we look at the policies and philosophies of our leadership, there is a striking similarity between their supposedly very different political, social and economic agendas.  Education "reform" provides us with a clear example of this.  The policies of the Bush administration, famous for the debacle of No Child Left Behind, gave way to a more "Progressive", Race to the Top, that essentially continued the policies that have been so harmful to our schools and our students.  In many ways, education "reform" is indicative of the prevailing solutions that are offered at the highest levels of our leadership.  The rhetoric may, or may not, change, but the policies remain strikingly similar.

Economic policy is another place where comparing leads us to believe that the decision makers at the highest levels are very similar in their motivations and their actions.  The wealthiest among us have the most access to power, and are able to move our leaders in directions that clearly benefit a specific segment of the population.

For real, positive change to occur we must look to identify places where these common interests diverge, and different ways of thinking emerge.  This is the "contrast" part of the critical thinking exercise.  If we stay in the "compare" section of our thinking we will remain mired in the same quagmire that we've always existed in.  Comparing requires us to look for differences and to base our decisions on the distinctions between competing ways of thinking.  It means that we don't have to continue our present course, but can work to make a difference in the world we live in.  If enough of us engage in thinking about the contrasts between ideologies we can shape the world that we live in.

This type of thinking can be painful and troubling at times.  It can force us outside of our comfort zones and make us take a stand for what we truly believe in.  It challenges us to look beyond the rhetoric and force our leaders and policy makers to respect the real wishes of the people they lead.  Too many of us are either unwilling to look critically at issues, or operate under the mistaken belief that their opinions don't matter because only the elite have any power.  This combination of ignorance and apathy is deadly, both to democracy, and to the "free-markets" that supposedly drive the American economy.

When we look carefully and analyze our society from a political, social and economic perspective, we can see that there are some real problems with the status quo.  We can also see that there are distinctly different approaches to resolving the problems that we face.  None of these problems are new, or unique to Wisconsin, or America, but we can work to promote creative, Progressive and positive solutions. 

Sometimes we need to have leaders speak up and give voice to our concerns.  Pope Francis has drawn criticism for his views on many issues, but they resonate with many progressive thinkers.  His statements about economics and social justice are particularly poignant.     
“This imbalance is the result of ideologies which defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation,” Pope Francis wrote. “Consequently, they reject the right of states, charged with vigilance for the common good, to exercise any form of control. A new tyranny is thus born, invisible and often virtual, which unilaterally and relentlessly imposes its own laws and rules.”

“The thirst for power and possessions knows no limits,” Pope Francis wrote. “In this system, which tends to devour everything which stands in the way of increased profits, whatever is fragile, like the environment, is defenseless before the interests of a deified market, which become the only rule.”



There are different approaches to resolving our problems, and nowhere are these differences more stark than between Wisconsin and Minnesota.  




Here in Madison we see a contrast between our measures of success for our African-American citizens and our LGBT citizens.  How is it that a community can score so well for one group and be at the opposite end of the spectrum for others?  How can we work to stay #1 in one area and still improve outcomes for all citizens?  
 

The struggles around Worker's Rights is another example of the need to think critically about issues.  There is a significant portion of the population that refuses to recognize the need for workers to organize and advocate for themselves.  Yet, all the evidence says that without collective action, the "market" simply crushes most individuals.





Here in Wisconsin we are gearing up for another, very visible, conflict around many of these issues.  The elections of 2014 will be won, or lost on the strength of the ability of Progressives to engage the citizenry in critical thinking.  This means finding ways to reach citizens, but also finding ways to influence the leadership that most closely represents our ideals.


Of course we can't forget that in order to effectively compare, contrast and otherwise use our analytical skills to make sound decisions, we need to have accurate information.  This means being careful about who we listen to, where we get our information and otherwise being careful consumers of information we use in our decision making processes.   


Don't forget to spend your money wisely during the holiday season.  Along with your vote, how you spend your money is an important way to express your values.
 

Sunday, November 24, 2013

#140 November 24, 2013- Ed. Reform and More Good, Bad and Ugly in Wisconsin



Stretched to the Breaking Point. . .
Public educators often feel pulled in many directions.  We hear the messages that our schools are failing, but more importantly we see students in our classrooms who are struggling.  We know that we can always try new strategies and work just a little harder to try and meet the needs of our students.  At the same time, we are given solutions to these challenges that are too often questionable in validity and frequently coming from sources that don't have our student's best interests at heart. 

Many of us feel compelled to try to implement these "reforms", even though, at the same time we question them.  Those educators who try to resist face penalties, harsh criticism and are identified as barriers to student achievement.  The propaganda machine of the "reformers" has created an atmosphere where trying to teach students in any manner outside of the prescribed methods is viewed as obstructionist and anti-achievement.
One of the most common attacks on educators comes in a seemingly neutral and logical question, "Don't you want what's best for your students?"  Of course the answer to this question is a resounding "YES".  I have yet to meet an educator who doesn't want their students to succeed, to be safe, and to be happily engaged in learning.  Educators devote a significant portion of their day, both in and out of school, doing everything possible to make this happen.  Yet, we are constantly reminded of our failures and our successes are minimized.   
Educators who try to stand up for themselves either individually, or collectively are vilified as selfish and lazy.  Yet, we are asked to go above and beyond the expectations in our contracts or job descriptions on a regular basis, and we do so willingly and with a constant eye on the welfare of our students.  Those who criticize educators for being concerned about our working conditions often do so, not out of concern for students, but rather because of a desire to undermine a group that they consider their political, social or economic enemies.

There are real problems in our school systems that need to be addressed.  Yet, because of the political conflicts the causes and potential solutions to these problems are often misidentified.



We need to have some real debate and discussion about how to make our system of public education better for all students.  Yet, in a climate of crisis, open dialog and proactive problem solving are some of the first things to disappear.  The debates become confrontations, and "solutions" are more geared towards punishing opponents than resolving problems.   



The debates around the best practices for educating students have been going on for a long time.  We need to continue these discussions and find the best possible strategies for teaching students.  At the same time we can't forget that every student is an individual and a "one size fits all" approach simply isn't realistic if we want students to succeed.



We also must emphasize the needs of students to grow and develop their skills in natural and developmentally appropriate ways.  Hearing an article about a potential "savior" of education say, "'My B.A. in economics was zero help in my profession today.” Instead, he says that countless hours playing games during his school years–poker, chess, backgammon–were the experiences that 'prepared me for what I do today.')" is troubling when the reforms that are proposed eliminate much of the potential to play and learn at the same time.  We can't set up a dual level school system where the wealthy learn in student friendly ways and the rest of the population is stuck in a system based on drills, fundamentals and assessment. 
  

Educators need to start taking back our  schools and the systems that we work with students in.  We've put too much trust in leaders from outside of our ranks, and are paying the price in policies that are not student or educator friendly.  The question of how to grow educator leaders, while not removing them from the place they are most needed, the classroom, is challenging.  We also need to work together to find ways to resist the "reforms" and implement real positive change in our schools.  




The Good, The Bad, The Ugly. . .
The Good
Senator John Lehman will be running for Lieutenant Governor in 2014.  He is the only announced candidate on the Democrat ticket to date.  He will be giving up his Senate seat, which he won in a 2012 recall election to pursue the office.  While it is unfortunate to for an incumbent to give up their seat in the closely contested Wisconsin Senate, the reality is that the redistricting of Senate boundaries done by the Republican controlled legislature would make his re-election extremely difficult and having a viable candidate for Lt. Governor is very important in the upcoming election.   
 


The Democrats are beginning to campaign on issues that will challenge Scott Walker to defend his record.


As we gear up for the 2014 campaign, other organizations are beginning to gear up to help unseat Walker.  Considering the amount of financial backing that Walker will enjoy, any and all support from different places will be needed.


The Bad
The only reason that this isn’t in the ugly category is that it should come as no surprise that our Chief Executive in the state regards public employees as a collective enemy of the state.


This item has the potential to move quickly into the “Ugly” category depending on the decision handed down by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.  The Court is going to rule on Wisconsin’s Photo ID Law that has been called one of the most restrictive pieces of legislation in the nation.  What makes this particularly troubling for many Wisconsinites is the fact that our state is looking more and more like a state in the deep South and not a Progressive Midwestern state.



This article gets at the heart of the problems that we currently face in education.  While it might appear that an article trumpeting an improved quality in American educators would be a welcome bit of news in this climate that is so hostile to education, the reality is that the way that “improved quality” is defined is problematic.  Their major measure of quality is the fact that the current crop of educators has a high concentration of individuals who scored in the top quartile of SAT scores.

Apparently the insecurity of the private-sector labor market has driven some individuals into the public sector in search of stability instead of higher wages.  While it isn’t hard to make the argument that the stability and security in educational occupations isn’t what it used to be, it seems that some students are viewing the public sector as preferable to the private sector.


What is especially troubling is that a source like Mother Jones can run a headline about the improved quality of teachers when the article gives little information that supports this beyond test scores and grades.  It should be clear to anyone involved in education that, while knowledge may be important, there are many factors that are more important in determining the quality of any individual educator.  Do we really want to have a crop of new educators who are entering the profession based on economic criteria?  What will happen when the job market improves, will they stay in education?  Doesn’t this definition of quality feed into the education “reformers” ideas that teaching shouldn’t be a career, but rather a stepping stone to  “better” more “valuable” positions.     


Another one for the mixed “good” and “bad” category.  The fact that we are continuing to look at the Walker regime’s record of questionable ethics is important.  However, considering the way that the previous John Doe investigation fizzled out, it is difficult to find much hope that more will come of this one.  Anything less than specific charges against Walker will give the Republicans ammunition for their defense of their leader.  They are already calling this a “witch hunt” and trying to reap political capital from the investigation.   



Most of us already knew this.


The economic policies of the Republican Party are geared, not for sustainable economic recovery, but rather for the profit of a small number of citizens.  This fact is clearly demonstrated in economic data, and makes the support of candidates like Walker by working and middle class citizens more troubling.  There is a real need to educate the voters about the economic realities that our society faces before too much more damage is done to our economy and to individuals/families. 




The Ugly
Wisconsin’s Supreme Court has been a source of embarrassment for many of us over the past few years.  The elections have been marred by outside money, mudslinging and highly partisan races.  We’ve seen bitter, sometimes physical, confrontations between Justices, and rulings that appear politically, not legally motivated.  Given the highly charged atmosphere in Wisconsin recently, the judicial system needs to be a non-partisan venue where key issues can be debated and neutral and legally consistent decisions can be reached.   
     

The Supreme Court is currently playing a huge role in the ongoing conflict over Act 10 and the rights of public employees to unionize in the state.  However, given the partisan nature of the current Court, the fairness and even legality of the rulings on this and similar issues will be called into question.  


Why do the Court's rulings matter so much?  Given Act 10's onerous requirements for unions and burdensome regulations the immediate future of unions in Wisconsin hangs in the balance.   

AFSCME Council 24's recertification vote was approved 329-15, but that was not enough to meet the requirements of Scott Walker's Act 10.


This is happening at the time when employees have significant needs for representation in the workplace.

For those who don't understand why derogatory and offensive mascots need to be changed, here's a concrete example.  We can't minimize the pain and suffering that these supposedly harmless symbols cause.