Sunday, February 9, 2014

#151 February 9, 2014- Race, Poverty and Education



Race, Poverty and
Education- Divide and Conquer. . .
Our public schools are not perfect places.  This shouldn't be a startling statement, after all, they reflect a society that is constantly grappling with a host of issues.  The reflect a society that has struggled to find ways to meet its lofty goals of freedom and opportunity for all citizens.  Our public schools exist within a context that makes it difficult for educators, families, students and the community to create a reality that lives up to our expectations.  We are constantly searching for reasons why our efforts fall short of our potential.  While there are many individual reasons why students struggle to succeed in schools, when we talk about Achievement Gaps there are two main causes that are put forth.

Some argue that the issues revolve around race.  When you look at the data it is clear that we have a real problem in our schools with the achievement of specific groups of students.  It is just as clear that the same groups that struggle in our schools, also struggle in our society in general.  This doesn't absolve our public schools of responsibility, but it does demonstrate that our societal difficulties in dealing with diversity are not exclusive to our public education systems.  




Others argue that the struggles of our students are tied more closely to poverty.  Once again, this assertion is supported by data.  Our students who live in poverty, no matter what their other demographic characteristics, don't succeed at a level that their middle and upper class peers achieve.  This is reflected in society outside of our public schools as well.  A person's social-economic class is relatively fixed and very difficult to change.   





These two sides have been competing for years.  As a public educator I have seen initiatives started to address student achievement and race, and I've seen initiatives started to address student achievement and poverty.  I've seen these two positions played against each other and I've seen students and educators lose because of these battles.  Dwindling school funding has been poured into targeted efforts to address achievement of specific groups and subgroups as though we can somehow separate the different aspects of our students' lives from others with any degree of success. 

So many factors play into our achievements in life.  Am I personally successful because of my status as a white male?  I certainly didn't achieve at the level I was capable of during my own public school days.  In fact, it wasn't until I reached my mid-twenties that I really started to achieve any degree of measurable success.  Did I benefit from my status as a part of a middle-class family?  I'm sure that gave me more leeway to take an indirect path to the place I occupy today.  I know that I enjoyed some benefits because of my different demographic characteristics.  Yet, at the same time they were not guarantees of success.  I know that many of my peers who share similar backgrounds with me have gone many different directions. 

In the end, success or failure is not only difficult to define and quantify, but it is also difficult to determine the single greatest reason for each individual's outcomes in any aspect of their life.  Our lives are so complex and involve so many different variables that we can rarely identify a single cause for any result. To try and point to any single characteristic as being the sole reason we succeed or fail is not only virtually impossible, but I also believe is counterproductive.


What happens is that we pit different groups against each other and end up failing to address the problems that we hope to solve.  Are many of the students who are failing in our schools African-American?  Yes.  Are many of the students who are failing in our schools English Language Learners?  Yes.  Are many of the students who are failing in our schools living in poverty?  Yes.  Do many of the students who are failing in our schools belong to multiple groups that are struggling in schools and society?  Yes.  Do we have students from all different demographics who are succeeding and failing?  Yes.    


How do we determine whether it was poverty, or some other factor that caused the struggles or successes of any given student?  How do we define success and failure in our school system?  How do we work to address these problems and attempt to meet individual student needs?  These three questions are often grouped together and are topics of intense debate. 

Yet, while we debate the answers to these questions, real human beings are grappling with realities that will shape their future.  We see different groups pitted against each other when the truth is, they share the same goals for our public schools and for every student who attends them.  As an educator I often see that strategies that work to effectively educate students of one demographic are just as applicable to other groups.  While we may need to change a few aspects of our structures or delivery, students are students just like people are people. 

The more that we try and isolate causes, the more we try to quantify and institutionalize successes, the further we travel down the road towards segregation and divisive policies that pit different groups within our school communities against each other.  Our public schools can be most successful when we work together as a community to support all of our children. 

The only way that we can work together as a community, is if we are able to talk, discuss and dispute together as well.  Unfortunately, too many conversations occur in isolation and too many voices are not heard when we talk about our public schools and those who work and learn in them.  This is the case at all levels, local to national, and on all topics.  We hear from a select few, but the majority of the families who rely on public schools to educate their children are silent. 


This silence exists for many reasons, but it certainly is a real problem when we try and develop solutions to the many challenges that our schools, educators and students face.  It is a silence that is accepted, and even welcomed by some.  The silence of families allows for some leaders to claim to speak for the underrepresented populations, but doesn't force them to truly be accountable to those they claim to speak for. 

The result is a collection of policies that sound good, and that sound like progress is being made towards addressing the inequities in our schools.  However, the promises and progress is based on flawed logic and often guided by profits, not results.     
                    


Once again, this isn't a phenomena that is exclusive to public education.  The same forces are at work in our political and economic policies as well.  


In the end, does race matter?  Yes.  Does socio-economic class matter?  Yes.  Do people matter?  Yes!!  We need to shift our focus back to people and what works for real individuals.  We need to have conversations about issues that may be difficult, but that focus on the realities of our current situation.  Policy makers need to actively seek out the ideas of those that they represent and craft solutions to problems based on what works for people, not what works best for our existing systems, those who are in charge, and those who are currently benefitting the most. 


Along the way to finding real solutions it is true that we will need to deal with issues around race, gender, language and poverty.  However, in order to find lasting solutions we will need to find answers to our most challenging questions that work for all the people in our society.  For me, this is why our public school systems have the potential to be the cornerstone to building an America that meets our Founding Documents lofty ambitions.  If we can craft a system that unites all citizens in an effort to achieve a common goal that benefits our entire society we will truly have done something amazing.  This begins with an effort to address the problems we face, not in isolation and in cutthroat competition, but in a spirit of community, compassion and with an eye on our society's future.  A future embodied in all our community's children. 

The Good, The Bad, and
The Ugly. . .
The Good: It's always good to see recognition of the efforts to combat education "reforms" by people around America.



Education is a serious topic, but there's always room for some fun.



The Bad: The fact that we are so concerned about money and where it is coming from overshadows the issues that should drive our electoral process.  



The Ugly: People have the right to protest in the manner of their choice.  I find it frustrating that this movement to boycott Girl Scout Cookies is gaining traction among members of an ideology that was so vehemently opposed to public employees exercising their rights to protest.  Not to mention that it is a misguided and narrow minded effort.  

Sunday, February 2, 2014

#150 February 2, 2014- Education, Labor and More



Educational Decision
Making. . .
Education is many different things to many different people.  For some it is a pathway to a career.  For others it is an enjoyable pursuit that leads them to new discoveries and widens their world view.  For others it represents hope for the future.  There are many different views of what an education is for, and what it means to be educated.  The topic of education is one worthy of significant public discussion, and our efforts to create thoughtful and meaningful public educational policy are among the most important that our public officials can undertake.

While there are many things that education can be to people, there are some things that it shouldn't be as well.  Education should not be a for-profit industry.  When we create a system that is driven by bottom-line thinking, we inevitably see a loss of opportunity for those who need access to it the most.  Unfortunately, we are seeing the lure of profit encroaching into the decision making processes that create policies for our public schools.  Many of the "reforms" that are being touted as educationally sound practices, are actually financially sound (for investors in education) and financially driven practices instead.    

Education shouldn't be a political tool used to attack those who are of a different ideology either.  Yet, we are seeing this becoming a regular feature in debates over public education as well.  Public educator unions have been a thorn in the side of Republicans here in Wisconsin for decades, and the GOP is taking advantage of their majority status to try and eliminate their opposition.  Initiatives like turning control of "failing" schools over to private companies (who will be prohibited from hiring existing, often unionized, staff) are poorly concealed ways to destroy the base of unionized public educators in Wisconsin. 
   

The people of Wisconsin are resisting changes like this, but these ideas don't go away, especially when supported by top GOP officials.  





Unfortunately, it isn't just Conservatives, or Republicans who are seeking to privatize and 'profitize' public schools.  Democrats don't have a great track record of providing meaningful support for public schools.  Instead, they often adopt parts of the GOP's plans and simply put a slightly different spin on them.  


What needs to happen is for the educators, families and students who value and support public education to join together and make public policy makers understand what education really means for our communities and our nation.  Equal educational opportunities need to be available for all no matter what the race, gender, income, zip code, etc. of any individual or group.  We can't allow our policy making to be guided by panic, shortsightedness or profitability.  Those who work and learn in the public schools, those who send their children to our public schools and those who live in the communities that our public schools serve need to have the loudest voice when decisions are made.  


Labor and Business. . .
Just like educational decision making is driven by the potential for profit, so to are our economic decisions.  Of course, this makes sense to a significant degree.  After all, businesses, unlike schools, should exist to make a profit.  No one can reasonably dispute the reality that if a business doesn't make money, it is not viable as a business.  While there have been many different economic philosophies put forward over the years, and some of these include thinking that radically shifts ownership and distribution of profits, the reality is that in almost every economic system developed around the world there is a stratification in wealth and control of financial resources.  Some people earn more, control more and benefit more from these economic and political systems.

At the same time, an argument can be made that huge disparities in wealth and power are not conducive to long term, sustainable success for any society.  When these huge economic gaps occur, they are usually followed by some degree of change in either the system, or in those who control the wealth.  Whether through legislation, revolution or other means, those with less access to financial resources find a way to advance their cause.  The questions often are, how radical, violent, or unpleasant is the change going to be, and what will the changes look like?    


America has endured many different periods when we struggled to resolve issues around distribution of wealth and power in very visible ways.  From the very beginning of our nation there was a tension between different groups around these issues.  These struggles haven't gone away with time.  America has not found a way to resolve economic, class and labor issues with any degree of permanence.  Yet, our recent history has been one of relative stability in terms of labor issues.

There are many reasons why we've enjoyed relative labor peace in the years after WWII and leading up to 2010.  The trends certainly haven't favored labor in many ways.  Yet, systems were in place that put a band-aid over the wounds caused by the conflicts between classes, labor and management.  Unions existed to represent some workers.  Collective bargaining existed for public employees in many states.  While a significant number of workers labored without protections, the general mood of the nation didn't support upheaval or change.  The case can be made that labor should have been more active and engaged, but in general the decades leading up to 2010 were the calm before the storm.

That all changed with the elections of 2010 and the electoral victories that gave Conservatives significant power in many states including Wisconsin.  Not content to continue to erode the power of labor through systematic, but gradual, attacks, these radical Conservatives used their power to try and eradicate the power of labor.  Needless to say, this awoke organized labor and created the uprisings and push-back that has been occurring around the nation ever since.   

The current picture is very troublesome for those who support worker's rights and a more equitable distribution of resources.  We are facing challenges in all areas, including the fight for public opinion.       







billmoyers.com
  

Yet, at the same time, labor has experienced a "Great Awakening" and we are seeing activism and awareness increasing significantly.  Hope is the greatest asset that unions provide, and we will continue to see workers fight for their rights to organize and represent their interests.    



   
 





                  The Good, The Bad, and
The Ugly. . .

The Good . . . Despite the constant efforts of many to discredit and demean the U.S. Postal Service, there are many who continue to recognize the importance of our mail carriers.  For me, this ongoing debate over the viability of the USPS is a symbol of the struggle that we are engaged in as a society.  We need to retain the benefits that humans delivering tangible messages and items provide.  That this continues to exist as a public service is also important.    


Labor and management can work together!!!



The Bad . . . More evidence that money is damaging our political system.


The Ugly . . . We can't allow our political system to be controlled by a wealthy few, who then use their power to harm citizens, our environment, and our way of life.  


Sunday, January 26, 2014

#149 January 26, 2014- Public Ed., Technology and Social Justice



Vouching for Public Schools. . .
We are constantly being showered with rhetoric that tells us our public schools are failing, that a significant number of our educators are either incompetent, unmotivated or both, and that we need to make drastic changes in the system in order to increase the equity in educational opportunities for all students.  Yet, the attacks are grounded in some false assumptions, half-truths and a legacy of efforts designed to undermine our public education systems across the nation.

Neither political party and very few interest groups have really stepped up to defend our public schools, despite the fact that these schools are the only place where services for students of all needs and demographics are mandated.  Instead, we have seen a call for re-segregating our schools and recreating a separate and unequal system that is not only unfair, but also unconstitutional.  Our public schools have been consistently maligned, underfunded and overregulated by those who claim to be acting "for the children." 


Yet, when funded and supported we have seen achievement gaps closed by our schools, and it is only in the last 25 years, as cuts to funding and new mandates were implemented, that we have seen this progress halted.  Here in Wisconsin we've seen cuts to education that are unprecedented in scale, and the efforts to demean the efforts of public educators intensified.  Data about our schools are twisted, and "reform" rhetoric has become the norm in discourse about public education.       
   



We are seeing pushback from supporters of public education.  A great example comes from those fighting against the efforts to promote legislation creating a special needs voucher (re-titled scholarship) program.




Tech, Trust,  Obstruction
and Advocacy . . .
Technology can be a valuable tool in our daily lives, and plays an important role in the education of our students as well.  The Madison school district recently unveiled an ambitious plan to improve access to technology for students in the district.    



Response to the plan was mixed, and there were strong opinions raised on all sides of the issue.  This topic has become a source of some controversy and intense feelings with a few unnecessary snide comments thrown in.    
Please take some time to look at the plan. If you have thoughts, questions, recommendations or even a reaction to share, we’d love to hear from you. Fire up the digital device of your choice, and send us an email at board@madison.k12.wi.us. If you think we’re making a mistake by proposing to race headlong into this technology thing, let us know that as well. But you might want to deliver that message via the Postal Service.


host.madison.com

While you should take time to read the plan itself, and formulate your own opinions, I want to take the time to expand on the position of those "opposed" to the plan. 

First, to identify us as opposed to the technology plan is inaccurate.  We support a plan to get technology in to our schools and in to the hands of our students.  Technology is a huge expense and these are tough financial times for schools.  To add technology, or any other initiative without careful planning and open, honest dialog would be a huge mistake and one that would likely cause more harm than benefit for our students.  The opposition arises not from an anti-technology viewpoint, but from an effort to insure wise implementation, to address existing needs, and to protect things that are of value from funding cuts. 

I would hope that in a district committed to education of all students, that opinions from the community would be a valued part of the discussion.  To imply that those who question the plan are out of touch with the modern world, as Board President Hughes does in his article on the MMSD website, does little to build support for the plan, or to foster open communication around this, or any, issue.

That leads directly to the issue of the speed with which supporters  are moving forward with the plan.  While they are making the argument that the tech plan has been a topic of discussion for months, many in the district have only become aware of the details in the past week or so.  Educators and students in the district have suffered from the quick implementation of district wide initiatives that have had mixed results in recent years.  The adoption of a district wide reading program for elementary students in the recent past is an example of this type of action.  One of our strengths as a district is the well educated and highly involved community that our schools are embedded in.  Through discussion and public input we will see new ideas come forth, and a stronger plan developed.

This isn't to say that we need to study, discuss and reformulate technology plans over the course of years, but rather that opening the discussion to a wider audience, including educators at a variety of buildings, will give us better results in the long run.  In the week or so since the plan was introduced we have seen input given, and modifications made in the plan.  Clearly there is an opportunity here to develop a positive and sustainable vehicle to get technology in to MMSD schools.  We appreciate the willingness of administration to listen to concerns, and hope that more opportunities will be given before a final plan is passed.               

The question that Tech Plan supporters have is, why would anyone resist improving the technology available to MMSD students?  After all, technology isn't going away and our district has not consistently kept up with the latest innovations and advances available.  Once again I remind you that those voicing concerns about the plan are not opposed to technology, nor are we simply obstructionists who want to criticize any new initiative.  In order to support a Tech Plan, or any initiative, I feel that a few basic issues must be addressed.

1- It must not take away from existing or new programs that build human supports for our students, families and community.  Education is a labor intensive endeavor and we need as many people as possible actively involved in the process.  Things like Ready, Set, Goal conferences, school staff in the most at-risk communities and enough staff to insure the diverse needs of all learners are met need to take precedence over any technology or materials that are purchased. 
While we are being assured that the Tech Plan won't restrict spending on these needs, it is difficult to believe that we will not see technology pitted against human resources at some time in the not so distant future. 

2- It must build on the strengths that exist in our schools, and fill a genuine need in a meaningful way.  There are many innovative ways that MMSD staff is using technology right now, and we should build off of these programs.  If we simply put devices in our schools we will not get the maximum benefit from our investment.  Putting decision making about technology at the school level can insure that we tailor purchases to the needs of a building and that funds are used in the best manner possible. 

3- It must be sustainable and supportable.  Too often we see our current technology failing us for a variety of reasons, and the idea that adding more will somehow improve things seems illogical.  There will be significant costs involved in educating educators to use technology most effectively, and to maintain the devices in buildings.  The best plans are often simple and develop over time, once again building on the strengths in each school around the district.

Unfortunately, there is also a history here of initiatives being rolled out to great fanfare, and then abandoned just as quickly.  It is unfair, and short sighted to oppose initiatives solely for this reason, but also very human to feel apprehension when a huge plan like this is unveiled.  Those anxieties are increased when a plan is accelerated through the system, and when those in favor of it speak in stark terms of "your either with us, or against us."  I hope that we can continue the dialog and emerge with a plan that will feature the best possible solutions to some very challenging problems.      

I invite everyone to come to the regular Board of Education meeting on Monday, January 27th @ 6PM in the McDaniels Auditorium at the Doyle Building to hear more about the plan.  Several SCAPE members will be offering their ideas, and we hope to hear from others in the community as well.  

State of My State. . .
"I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is […] the white moderate, who is more devoted to 'order' than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice."  These words come from Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" and ring true through the years.  I would argue that we are facing conditions that are returning us to an America where access to opportunity and justice are becoming more restricted, and that we are seeing issues of injustice becoming more widespread with every passing day.  While visibly true for citizens of different races, all of us are feeling the effects of policies designed to divide and conquer us.  Whatever your demographic identity, it is becoming clear that we are facing a concerted effort to return American society to a time in history where phrases like, "All men" meant some men, and "The general welfare" referred to a select few.      

The idea that Dr. King espouses about "the white moderate" can be expanded to include anyone of any demographic who is satisfied with the current status quo that exists in our state and our nation.  We are hearing a lot about "freedom", "opportunity" and "equality", but the words are ringing hollow when we see the reality that so many of our fellow citizens are experiencing.  Too many of us are simply willing to sit on the sidelines and allow those who are in power manipulate our system and speak for us. 

We need to increase the tension in our society in a positive way.  This means speaking up for what we believe in and not accepting the word of social, political and economic leaders as truth simply because it was uttered by someone with credentials.  We need to make sure that we stay informed and involved and use whatever methods available to make our voices heard in the debates that currently occupy our attention.  We also need to make sure that we are aware of future struggles looming on the horizon. 

Dr. King was a champion for Civil Rights, which included rights for all people.  He was a voice for labor, a voice against violence and a voice for equality for all.  His message and legacy, which we honored on Monday, is one that we need to make sure is heard throughout the year, and applied to all situations.  It is interesting to see how Dr. King's memory is juxtaposed with the message that was delivered by Scott Walker on Wednesday.  Walker used some of the same words like "opportunity" and spoke of putting "power back in to the hands of the people."  However, the truth behind these words is not the truth that Dr. King spoke about. 



It is up to us to reject order unless it leads to justice, and to create the tension that is necessary to lead our state down the path towards opportunity and justice for all.  We must refuse to allow empty words and promises to replace the collective actions that promote widespread equality and positive relationships between citizens of many different demographics.  We can't forget that all the talk of budget surpluses and tax refunds are part of an agenda that focuses on building economic success for a few on the backs of the many.  As George Washington said, "Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains taken to bring it to light." 
 





The Good, The Bad
and The Ugly. . .
The Good . . .  A victory for labor!!



The Bad . . .  Another federal court case that could change things drastically for unions around America.  Meanwhile, Wisconsin unions await our Supreme Court's ruling on MTI's case against Act 10.  


The Ugly . . .  We know that there are inequities in the distribution of wealth, but this is startling.



Meanwhile, most of us are working harder, and losing ground.