Sunday, March 3, 2013

Issue #103- Politics, Pride in Public Education



Politics…
With about a month to go before the April elections things have definitely heated up here in Wisconsin.  Of course, we should expect no less from a state that has been engaged in perpetual political campaigning for the past two years.  The tone of political discourse in the Badger State has degenerated significantly from issue related discourse to heated rhetoric and name calling.  This is true on both sides and needs to be addressed if we are to be able to return to any constructive, civil discourse on issues of great importance.  Our current climate has resulted in a lack of bi-partisan actions and mirrors the stalemate at the national level that has brought us so much turmoil and so little in the way of progress.
Politics has always been an area where we see some of the worst aspects of human nature rise to the surface.  Mudslinging, scandal and questionable tactics have long been a feature of political races.  Some of the less desirable strategies have the positive effect of bringing needed information to light, but we have crossed the line in recent years and created an environment where it is easier to do the wrong thing in order to hold on to key constituencies and sources of financial support than it is to take a stand for the general good. 
There is enough blame for our current situation to go around.  Some responsibility lies with the big money donators and lobbyists who peddle their influence and buy democracy for their own interests.  Some fault lies with the politicians who surrender their responsibilities and follow a party line or who work harder on staying in office than in representing their constituents.  We can't forget to place some accountability on the voters themselves.  Many of whom simply don't vote and therefore allow for small numbers of people to decide the fate of everyone. 
Too many of us have surrendered our power to decide our fate and simply bemoan the "fact" that this is the way things have to be.  That politics and politicians are inevitably corrupt and self-serving and that the vast majority of us must simply tolerate the reality that our government doesn't work for us.  We can't accept that as truth and still claim to believe in the American version of democracy and the ideals of freedom.  Instead of passively allowing our lives to be governed by those who would rule in their own self-interests, we must begin to do the hard work of becoming Citizens and not just people who happen to live in the United States.  Citizens are active participants who gather information, voice their opinions and make themselves heard.  Something each of us must do in order to restore true democracy to Wisconsin.           
Supreme Court races in Wisconsin have been a prime example of what is wrong with our current situation.  Voter turnout has typically been extremely light, the influence of special interests has been obvious and the level of discourse around the election has been low.  This year we face another election where most people will simply go out and vote along partisan lines.  It wouldn't be a stretch to assume that most voters really have very little idea who the candidates are and what they stand for.  We also know that incumbents have a distinct advantage in these types of elections, so unless Fallone is able to find a way to reach a significant number of voters this race will be very difficult for him to win.  The race is not necessarily a referendum on Walker or the GOP in Wisconsin, but rather a referendum on whether the status quo will remain in place here.    


I continue to find it troubling that our justices are making decisions based on the intent of the legislature and not on the Constitution.  To me that seems like a weakening of the separation of powers and the checks and balances system that helps protects our rights.  A legislature, often elected by a small number of citizens, can by declaring its intent write laws that they should know don't represent the views of the people. 

How many of our elected representatives were elected based on the platform of harming the environment?  Yet, Tom Tiffany, R-Hazelhurst says, when speaking about the mining bill, “If the law is challenged and ends up in court, the judge needs to know it was the Legislature’s intent to allow adverse (environmental) impacts. That way, a judge can’t find fault if the environment is impacted.”  Justice Roggensack has repeatedly stated that she will uphold laws like the mining bill or, it's relatively safe to assume, Act 10 because of legislative intent.  In doing so, I believe she becomes an extension of the GOP controlled legislative and executive branch and not a member of an independent judiciary.  


The race for State Superintendent of Schools will also feature partisan politics without much substance.  In this case Tony Evers is the incumbent and will be faced by an opponent who is calling for radical "reforms" of our public schools.  Evers has spoken out in defense of public education and is the best choice for those who value public education in Wisconsin.   


Usually school board elections don't muster up much in the way of political attention, but this year's Madison school board races have been anything but typical.  The race for Seat #5 has garnered most of the attention because of the withdrawal or the primary winner just 2 days after the February primary.  Add to this confusion, the current budget proposed by Governor Walker that advocates the expansion of the voucher system into districts like Madison and we are seeing an unusual level of conversation around the three school board races.  


Once again there is a high level of misinformation and partisan talking points are drowning out meaningful conversations about the Achievement Gaps, school reforms and parental choice in schools.  Voters will need to sift through a large amount of information and propaganda to uncover what the candidates actually believe and what the future they see for Madison's public schools looks like.  The issues of student achievement and other educational issues are extremely complex and deserve our full attention as well as extensive coverage by all media outlets.    


In all three races it is important for voters to find trusted sources, listen to the candidates, investigate the candidates records and avoid falling prey to the distortions and manipulations of advertising and partial reporting of facts.  These are high stakes elections for our students and our public schools. 

Not My Wisconsin…
Here in Wisconsin we have a state that is fairly evenly divided between political ideologies.  When you look at the recent electoral results you see a state that is not consistent in it's support of a specific party or philosophy.  Yet, the trends in our legislation and public policy lean heavily towards extremely conservative thinking.  This disconnect between the people and our elected representatives is widening and a source of increasing frustration among the people of Wisconsin. 

Governor Walker's recently unveiled state budget is an example of how far to the right our government has swung.  While claiming to be less controversial and more moderate in tone, the reality is that this budget is every bit as extreme as the one that caused all of the tumult in 2011.  In addition to the budget there are other equally disturbing things that our current crop of conservative legislators are planning to send to Walker's desk for his stamp of approval.  





All that is missing is a catalyst like Act 10 to revive the massive protests from two years ago.  Or, maybe, the people of Wisconsin have seen that large scale protests will have little impact on the actions of our well insulated leaders and are trying to resist in other ways.  After the outpouring of dissatisfaction in 2011 that lead to the massive recall efforts, Wisconsinites have continued their organizing and are working together to resist the wave of conservative "reforms" that have swept our state.     


Public education has long been a source of pride for many citizens of the Badger State.  We know that we don't have a perfect system for everyone, but our public schools have the potential to be a great equalizer of opportunity for all citizens.  In addition our public schools are home to a powerful political force in the form of our public educators and their unions.  In 2011 the GOP leaders in Wisconsin opened an all out assault on public education and the 2013 version of conservative leadership is continuing these attacks.    





Expanding vouchers, not increasing per pupil revenue limits and further constraining the ability of school districts to balance their budgets without draconian cuts is the latest in the continuing efforts of Wisconsin Republicans to destroy public education in our state.  The savings garnered from punishing public educators have been used up and now districts are forced to find other ways to balance budgets that are threatened by reductions in state and federal aid.  

These efforts to undermine our public schools are so extreme that they are forcing some members of the GOP to rethink their support of the proposals.


Many of us saw this headline with a great amount of sadness.  He may be corrupt and unethical, but apparently not enough of either to generate an indictment.


No Apologies…
No question that these are bleak days for public educators.  However, even with all that is happening, the public educators of Wisconsin are continuing with our efforts to try and serve our students, families and communities as best we can given the current conditions we work under.  We know that there is much work to do, but we embrace the challenges and have hope for a future where all students are supported and given the best opportunity to achieve in public schools that are fully supported financially and politically. 

I don't apologize for being an educator.  In fact I find myself feeling more pride in my profession now, than I ever have.  I don't need the sympathy of anyone because my job is difficult, my pay is shrinking and my profession is frequently maligned.  I know that everyone faces challenges in their jobs, and that life is difficult for families across our state and our nation.  Instead of asking for pity I am hoping that all citizens can look at each other with empathy and begin to find commonalities that we can use to build cooperation and to create a society where all people have hope for the future and equal opportunities for success.

I believe that public schools are one of the best vehicles for us to achieve a socially just society.  That they haven't succeeded in this goal is as much a fault of everyone as it is public educators and the public education system. 

A few examples of why our schools don't work for everyone…

Our goals are skewed, our measurements are flawed and those with the most find ways to manipulate the system to increase their chances for success.  One of the criticisms of our public schools is that they don't identify and support talented students from different demographic groups.  We find our administrations looking to testing companies to help identify students.  Yet, it isn't any surprise that there will be companies (often with ties to those that design the tests) who will then create test preparation programs designed to help students perform well, even 4 year olds.         


I've written extensively on the dangers of our system of testing students and defining success based entirely on a series of standardized test results.  We criticize our schools for failing to be culturally sensitive to our students and then evaluate their performance (and their school's performance) based on culturally biased tests.  To quote Diane Ravitch speaking about Common Core standards and testing, "(The combination of Common Core and changes in testing will)     
have a disparate impact on students who are English language learners, students with disabilities, and students who are poor and low-performing."  We are claiming to be implementing "reforms" that will improve our schools, when in fact we are too often doing the opposite.

We often have the wrong people making decisions for our public schools.  For example, the Common Core standards are currently being touted as the way to fix our education system.  However, to again quote Diane Ravitch, "They were developed by an organization called Achieve and the National Governors Association, both of which were generously funded by the Gates Foundation. There was minimal public engagement in the development of the Common Core. Their creation was neither grassroots nor did it emanate from the states."



Too frequently we have "outside experts" come in to "fix" our schools.  These "experts" often have little if any experience in a classroom and often are connected to groups that stand to profit from the "reforms" that are suggested. 
Most people have a very inaccurate view of what educators do and the conditions that we work in.  The news from major districts across the nation is horrifying.  Recently educators in Philadelphia were offered a new contract that cut pay, increased out of pocket costs for health coverage, increased the workload and hours, suggested that teachers, "would also have to lead professional development, attend meetings, perform bus, yard and lunch duty and be available for parent meetings outside work hours with no extra pay."  Stick it to the educators?  There are those who would support that, but it is also the kids who are harmed when class sizes are increased, support staff like librarians and social workers are cut and curriculum is weakened in order to increase test scores.  



Education has become one of the central political issues that divides us.  Somewhere along the road we managed to lose focus on what exactly our public schools should be all about.  The fight to improve public education isn't about power for educators or public sector unions.  If that was the case then we would see many more strikes and job actions given the current state of working conditions for most educators. 

Educating our young people shouldn't be controversial.  We shouldn't be fighting over nickels and dimes just so a few people can make dollars off of our students and our schools.  It is a travesty that there are those who would actively seek to destroy our schools, just so that they can make a profit or increase their political power.   Our politicians treat education like it is a zero-sum game, that is to say that there is a finite amount of "education" to go around and we need to control how it is "given" to the public.  In reality we can educate all people well, if we, as a society, decide that is something that is of value. 

It shouldn't surprise us that there are people who are willing to use children's futures for their own gain.  Education has been wielded as a weapon throughout history, either used as a "carrot" to reward groups or withheld from specific groups out of fear or as a punishment.  People have been excluded from educational opportunity because of race, religion, gender, income or virtually any other definable characteristic.  The history of public education is one of incremental change over time.  We are currently in an era where the change is moving in the wrong direction.  Schools are becoming more segregated, control is more centralized and education is seen more as career building than life improving. 

With all of that going on, why would I (or anyone) be proud to be an educator?  Why not just give up and allow the "reformers" to control the educational system here in the U.S.?  What hope is there for the future of public education when the debate has been framed in such a way as to virtually guarantee failure for public schools? 

I go to work every day in a public school where I see educators working hard to try and give students every imaginable opportunity to succeed and to build the skills they will need for the future.  I am a part of several groups that are working to build connections between different parts of our community and to share the positive things that are happening in our public schools.  I know that there are many great people working to try and change the focus of the discussion away from one that seeks to find deficits to one that looks for strengths to build upon.

Our nation needs public schools in order to continue as a democracy and to unify our society.  Without integrated public schools we become a nation of separate (and unequal) groups who see each other as opponents as much as fellow citizens.  We can already see how the weakening of our public schools creates a stratified class system in many places. 

I am proud of my fellow educators who work all day with students and who find time to advocate for our schools as well.  There are those who argue that educators should be non-partisan.  That would be the case if public education wasn't being used as a political football.  Educators are fighting for our public schools just like businesses lobby for their interests.  I don't apologize for those who advocate for public education and educators.  Especially those who are former educators themselves.  Why should the voice of educators be absent from public discourse about public education?  The major difference I see is that public educators are advocating for the good of many and not a specific special interest.  We are working to open up dialog across boundaries that have traditionally separated some students from educational achievement.    

Can we do a better job of educating all of our students?  Of course we can.  No system ever has, or probably ever will, be able to guarantee that every student will achieve at their highest possible level.  What we can do is our best to make sure that every pupil is given a fair opportunity.  How we go about doing this is not static, and change is a part of education.  If we had all the answers, then there wouldn't be any controversy. 

So amidst all of the strife and turmoil there is hope.  Public education and public educators have been a part of the fabric of our society for a long time and we are not giving up our place without a fight.         
  

Sunday, February 24, 2013

Issue #102 February 24, 2013- Primary Results, Organizing and the Budget



Primary Results, Democracy Threatened?…
A few thoughts about the February 19th primary…
The results of the Supreme Court race weren't terribly surprising.  There was little doubt that Justice Roggensack would advance and with the support of many key groups, Ed Fallone, was in good shape to be her opposition in April's election.  We should expect the usual Supreme Court race in Wisconsin to shape up over the next few weeks.  This means lots of rhetoric, lots of money from influential groups, and enough negative advertising to make everyone uncomfortable and frustrated with the process. 
It should be well understood by all Wisconsinites that this race will have a huge impact on our state's immediate future.  The way that legislation and policy is made under the Walker administrations rule insures that our courts will see lots of litigation and will play a pivotal role in deciding what laws and actions are implemented. 
If you remove the obvious connections that Roggensack has to the conservative base in Wisconsin, I still have significant concerns about her philosophy as a justice.  I have always believed that our system of government relied on "checks and balances" between the different branches to prevent any single entity from becoming the sole holder of power.  The Supreme Court exists as the final arbitrator in disputes over the constitutionality of any act by the executive or legislative branches.  Justice Roggensack operates under the belief that she should work to, "…Continue to uphold the legislative intent of the state Senate and Assembly."  A belief that I heard her articulate on Vickie McKenna's radio show last week as well.  Shouldn't our justices work to uphold the state Constitution and not the intent of the legislature?


The low turnout is an embarrassment and demonstrates the unwillingness of our state's citizens to fulfill their responsibilities as the cornerstone of democracy.  Is it really a democratic action if only about 1 in 10 people participate?  The fact that we saw such a poor turnout in a state that should recognize the importance of any election shows us that we still haven't learned our lessons from the recent past.  We must do everything possible to get more people to the polls in April or we will continue to face a government that only represents the few and not the many.

We are becoming a society of special interests and this is undermining our government's ability to govern and our ability to function as a unified nation.  The fact of the matter is that with a small number of voters participating, these off year elections have become an opportunity for special interest groups to insert themselves into the power structure of our government.  With most people sitting out the elections it only takes a small number of dedicated voters to swing an election in any direction.  The candidates who are elected wield the same representative power if they receive the votes of 6% of the population as if they garner the support of 96% of the eligible voters.  Suddenly our "representative democracy" really isn't so representative is it?

Of equal concern is the continuing division of the electorate into special interest groups based on demographics or other unifying interests.  As our nation stratifies along racial, gender, religious, economic or other lines we see less cooperation among groups and more "infighting" between those whose interests are often very similar.  This can be observed in the conflicts that arise in efforts to address issues like the Achievement Gaps in our schools, the disparity in incarceration rates, the economic inequalities that exist in our nation and in countless other areas where we see injustice and inequality in our society.

That our nation has some huge problems dealing with issues of social justice shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.  Yet our ways of dealing with them are in many cases hampering efforts to address the problems we face.  Instead of uniting together and finding common ground we often find ourselves forming task forces, committees, or organizations that in themselves are segregated and divisive. 

As a white, middle-class (for now) male should my opinions about issues of race or gender be of lesser value?  Shouldn't I have just as much interest in resolving the challenges we face and improving the opportunities for all my fellow citizens?  Wouldn't we find more lasting and powerful solutions if our organizing efforts centered around finding common ground across all demographics instead of only reaching out to those who are "directly impacted"?  Aren't we all impacted by the inequities that exist for any of our citizens?

Of course it is difficult to mobilize widespread support for an issue that appears to only impact a smaller demographic group.  Take for example some of these statistics for African-American citizens of Dane County (this information was compiled by the Urban League of Greater Madison).
         
·         In 2011, 25.2% of Blacks in Dane County were unemployed compared to 4.8% of Whites.

·         Just 55.6% of Black men and 62.6% of Black women in Dane County were employed in 2010 compared to 72% of White men and 68% of White women.

·         In 2011, the median household income for Blacks in Dane County was $20,664, less than 1/3 the “median income” of White households in Dane County ($63,673). It was also less than the household income for Blacks statewide ($24,399) and nationwide ($33,223). This means that the majority of Blacks in Dane County live in poverty while most whites are upper middle class.

·         Contrary to what some believe, only 8.1% of Blacks in Dane County drew cash public assistance in 2010. However, this was much higher than the .9% rate among Whites. Additionally, 34.2% of all Blacks in Dane County received Food stamps/SNP benefits because their low-incomes qualified them for it.

·         In 2011, 74.8% of Black children in Dane County were living in poverty compared to 5.5% of White children. The poverty rate among Black children in Dane County was 50% higher than the poverty rate among Black children statewide, and nearly twice as high as the black child poverty rate nationwide. The poverty rate among Black children grew from less than 50% in 2006 to 75% in 2011, while the poverty rate among White children remained stable.

·         In 2010, 86% of all Black, 85% of all Latino, 49% of Asian and 18% of White students enrolled in the Madison Metropolitan School District were poor (qualified for free-and-reduced price lunch). Students of color now comprise 55% of the total enrollment in MMSD (2012-13 school year).

·         In 2011, nearly half (48.1%) of Dane County’s Black third graders failed to meet proficiency standards in reading, compared to 10.9% of White third graders. Similarly, nearly half (47.7%) of Dane County’s Black eighth graders failed to meet proficiency standards in math, compared to 10.4% of White eighth graders.

·         In 2012, 50% of Black students attending the Madison Metropolitan School District (MMSD), Dane County’s largest public school system and the state’s second largest, failed to graduate from high school.

·         Just 3% of Black high school seniors attending all four of MMSD’s comprehensive high schools in 2011-12 were academically ready for college according to high school graduation rates and results from the ACT college entrance exam.

·         In 2010, only 20% of Blacks age 25 and older held bachelor’s degrees compared to 46% of Whites, 14% of Hmong and 22% of Hispanics.

·         In 2010, just 19% of Blacks in Dane County owned their homes while 81% were renters. The same year, 64% of Whites owned their homes while 34% rented. This was the exact same rate of homeownership for Blacks in Dane County 1990.

·         In 2010, Blacks owned less than 1% of all businesses in Dane County, while comprising 5% of the County’s total population.

·         In 2011, according to data provided by the Wisconsin Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Minority Business Development and City of Madison, there were are only four black-owned businesses with 10 or more full-time employees in Dane County.

·         Low marriage rates are also challenging the wealth accumulation and financial stability of Black families more than other groups in Dane County. In 2010, 55% of Black women in Dane County were not married, compared to 33% of White, 40% of Hmong and 35% of Latino women.

·         In 2010, 75% of Black births in Dane County were to unmarried mothers, compared to 20% of White births in Dane County. This was somewhat consistent with national trends, as 73% of Black births and 29% of White births were to unmarried mothers the same year. While births to single mothers were 4 times higher among Blacks than Whites in Wisconsin in 2010, the Black child poverty rate was 14 times greater than that of Whites.

·         In 2006, a study by a University of Wisconsin-Madison professor found that 47% of African American males between the ages of 25-29 in Dane County were either incarcerated, on probation or under some form of court supervision. This percentage continues to hover around 45% with a significant number of men who’ve been released from jail and prison reporting significant difficulties with finding employment.

Startling statistics, definitely.  The Urban League uses these statistics as a rallying call to gather members of the African-American community to work to address them.  I certainly don't challenge the need for members of this community to work to address issues that directly impact them, but also argue that the conditions of any group impacts our community as a whole.  Will any group, operating in relative isolation be able to impact their situation as effectively as the same group operating united with others in the community?  Taking the Civil Rights Movement as an example it appears clear to me that it is only through increasing the diversity in a movement can we hope to create real change. 

The reality of modern America is that a vast majority of our population, independent of race or ethnicity, is losing their ability to influence their socio-economic conditions.  The loss of power is used as a wedge to separate groups and to increase the status and power of those with access to decision makers.  This is another reason why inequality shouldn't be an issue addressed by any single demographic group.  If we don't work to educate and engage all people then we will see a majority of citizens operate under the false assumption that certain issues don't impact them. 


The challenge is to find ways to bring people together and to make the issues of inequality relevant to all people.  It is too easy for any of us to ignore the challenges faced by others and concentrate solely on our own interests.  This problem is compounded by the existing prejudices and stereotypes that members of different communities have regarding each other.  We are a society that is divided in so many ways. 

The problems we face are compounded by the rhetoric and hyperbole that is thrown around in public forums.  For example, there were several comments after the school board primary that Madison's electorate was racist because Ananda Mirilli finished 3rd.  I can't speak for all the voters, but most of the people I know voted for the candidate of their choice based on other criteria than race or even gender.  I also can't speak about the politics that may or may not have gone on behind the scene.  The unfortunate reality of our current situation is that every action is viewed through a lens of mistrust, skepticism and outright dislike for those with opposing views.  This isn't to discount the real racism that does exist, but I believe that to make blanket statements about large groups of people does more harm than good.

The need for unity between groups and diversity in coalitions formed to promote positive change goes way beyond issues around race or ethnicity.  Any group that is working to create a power base to operate from needs to engage multiple groups in order to succeed.  Public employees can't win their fight without the support of all labor.  Defenders of public education can't successfully defend our public schools without going to the community as a whole.  We must even try to engage our opponents in dialog and build relationships with those who have opposing viewpoints whenever possible.  

In the end we must continue to work at the individual level to create unity out of the separations that are entrenched in all aspects of our national culture.  We need to find ways to celebrate our differences while building an identity as a nation that is working towards meeting the lofty expectations that we have so often expressed for our society.  We must remain conscious of our existing challenges while looking towards a future where we can see beyond our differences and recognize the value that every person has in a just and fair civilization.

Education Races…
The upcoming races for Seats 3, 4 and 5 on Madison's School Board will be very important as the district faces important issues and decisions during the next year.  This board will face continuing pressure to privatize our schools in order to address the achievement gap.  It will also be instrumental in the continually evolving labor relations situation that has been created by the actions of state Republicans.  They will also be working with a new superintendent who will very likely bring some new philosophies and ideas to the discussions around Madison's public schools.  

host.madison.com
One of the races, that for Seat #5, changed dramatically as Sarah Manski withdrew from the race.  This just after winning the primary election on Tuesday.
http://m.isthmus.com/article.php?article=39175
Tony Evers also will be involved in an important race for State Superintendent of Public Instruction.  It should be obvious that we public schools in Wisconsin can't afford to have a conservative who supports privatization and cuts to education in office at the state level.  Tony Evers has spoken against the "reforms" offered by Governor Walker and other GOP officials.   

It's Not About Education…
What is immensely frustrating to supporters of public education is the reality that so many of the "reforms" offered to "fix" our schools have very little to do with education.  Instead of addressing the real needs of our educational system, we are seeing initiatives launched that promote profits for a few and advance the goals of special interest groups over proposals that would benefit a majority of our students.
One example of this is the effort to expand the voucher system to more Wisconsin school districts.  Whether these vouchers are for students in general education, or those with special needs the impact on school districts and the families they serve are negative and harmful.      








Even businesses in education aren't exempt from the unfair practices imposed by GOP leaders.


Scott Walker's budget contains many parts that harm our public schools.  We are supposed to be grateful for any increases in funding after decimating public school's finances in the last budget, but these "modest increases" are at best a token offering.  At worst they are a smokescreen to make Walker appear moderate to the masses as we build towards a 2014 gubernatorial race.  If nobody who is directly involved in education seems to support Walker's proposals, then whose interests does this budget represent?  






Budget fight could be looming in the state Senate : Ct

There is no denying that the continuing assault on public education and educators has had an impact on those in the profession. 


We can't afford to ignore the continuing assaults on all public employees in Wisconsin.  Public educators are only one part of the public employee ranks.
host.madison.com